No, idiot, a little bit of reading comprehension and you would know the answer. I do object with that POS's method. He is like a little boy that can't get what he wants and starts screaming everywhere
It is my opinion and if you don't like it, you can fuck off too.
I will just go back to putting that POS on IGNORE again.
If you want to call him annoying, ok, but POS, why?
Twice in a single post, even.
I have seen you on a source thread calling them scammers, non stop.
Has anyone there called you annoying or POS?
So, the source is a scammer and you are there to ram your point across.
And don't start arguing about this source not being scammers because it's not the point.
If we look at what you are doing, there, you would say that the method justifies the end, right?
And, yet, here you are calling someone a POS, because of their approach.
If people think Readalot's posts and actions are too intrusive, they can say, and they have.
On the one hand, if sources are going to implement improvements, there will need to be a certain level of insistence (you are familiar with that) because, with so many customers not really caring, why should they change stuff?
On the other hand, if people want this to be conducted in a different way, I am sure they can come to an agreement without calling someone a piece of shit.