Genome (DNA) Sequencing/Analysis

Just as TRT made a huge impact...DNA mapping will have a greater impact on medicine of the future. Why people are chasing down stream of stress responses I am going up stream to the highest level known...our genetics. Evening more important is the combination of DNA mapping with GI mapping for better over all health.
 
The genetic data of more than 1,000 people from around the world seemed stripped of anything that might identify them individually. All that was posted online were those data, the ages of the individuals, and the region where each of them lived. But when a researcher randomly selected the DNA sequences of five people in the database, he not only figured out who they were, but he also identified their entire families, though the relatives had no part in the study. His foray into genomic sleuthing ended up breaching the privacy of nearly 50 people.

And all it took was triangulation, using the genetic data, a genealogy Web site and Google searches. While the methods for extracting relevant genetic data from the raw genetic sequence files were specialized enough to be beyond the scope of most laypeople, no one expected it would be so easy to zoom in on individuals.

Continue Reading …

Search of DNA Sequences Reveals Full Identities
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/health/search-of-dna-sequences-reveals-full-identities.html



Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference. Science 2013;339(6117):321-4. Identifying Personal Genomes by Surname Inference

Sharing sequencing data sets without identifiers has become a common practice in genomics. Here, we report that surnames can be recovered from personal genomes by profiling short tandem repeats on the Y chromosome (Y-STRs) and querying recreational genetic genealogy databases. We show that a combination of a surname with other types of metadata, such as age and state, can be used to triangulate the identity of the target. A key feature of this technique is that it entirely relies on free, publicly accessible Internet resources. We quantitatively analyze the probability of identification for U.S. males. We further demonstrate the feasibility of this technique by tracing back with high probability the identities of multiple participants in public sequencing projects.


Bohannon J. Genealogy Databases Enable Naming of Anonymous DNA Donors. Science 2013;339(6117):262. Science Magazine: Sign In

By applying an algorithm to anonymized genomes from a research database and doing some online sleuthing with popular genealogy Web sites, researchers were able to guess the true identities of DNA donors. Privacy concerns have been raised about publicly accessible genome data before, and managers of a popular repository were aware of the risks posed, but few people had guessed how easy deanonymizing the data was. As genealogy databases and other resources improve, how can individuals be protected, and what are the implications?


Rodriguez LL, Brooks LD, Greenberg JH, Green ED. The Complexities of Genomic Identifiability. Science 2013;339(6117):275-6. Science Magazine: Sign In

Sharing research data has long been fundamental to the advancement of science. In today's scientific culture, making research data available broadly and efficiently via the internet has become the standard for many data types, including genomic and some other "omic"-type data produced by high-throughput methods. The acceleration of research progress and the resulting public benefit achieved through such broad data-sharing have been transformative for the scientific enterprise (1–3). However, sharing data generated from human research participants must be done in a manner that appropriately protects participant interests.
 
Ku CS, Roukos DH. From next-generation sequencing to nanopore sequencing technology: paving the way to personalized genomic medicine. Expert Rev Med Devices 2013;10(1):1-6. An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

High-throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies have revolutionized biomedical research. These breakthrough platforms have rapidly evolved from next-generation sequencing (NGS) or second-generation (2G) platforms to third-generation (3G) and fourth-generation (4G) sequencing machines. Sequencing, mapping and comparing the genomes of cells in healthy and disease states, cheaply, rapidly and accurately can alter the way clinicians think about how to treat patients shifting from traditional medicine to a genome-based era of preventive and therapeutic decisions. Particularly, in cancer with extreme genomic heterogeneity, applying HTS in cancer tissue samples from individual patients provides unprecedented power to reach personalized, highly effective approaches overcoming current therapeutic resistance.
 
Is Poverty in Our Genes?

Guedes JdA, Bestor TC, Carrasco D, et al. Is Poverty in Our Genes? A Critique of Ashraf and Galor, “The ‘Out of Africa’ Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic Development.” American Economic Review (Forthcoming). Current Anthropology 2013;54(1):71-9. JSTOR: An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie

We present a critique of a paper written by two economists, Quamrul Ashraf and Oded Galor, which is forthcoming in the American Economic Review and which was uncritically highlighted in Science magazine. Their paper claims there is a causal effect of genetic diversity on economic success, positing that too much or too little genetic diversity constrains development. In particular, they argue that “the high degree of diversity among African populations and the low degree of diversity among Native American populations have been a detrimental force in the development of these regions.” We demonstrate that their argument is seriously flawed on both factual and methodological grounds. As economists and other social scientists begin exploring newly available genetic data, it is crucial to remember that nonexperts broadcasting bold claims on the basis of weak data and methods can have profoundly detrimental social and political effects.


Also, see: Is Poverty in Our Genes? A Critique of Ashraf and Galor, “The ‘Out of Africa’ Hypothesis, Human Genetic Diversity, and Comparative Economic | Jade d'Alpoim Guedes - Academia.edu
 
Mass Production for Genomics
Sequencing a complete human genome may soon cost less than an iPhone. Will China’s BGI-Shenzhen decode yours?
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/511051/mass-production-for-genomics/
 
Khoury MJ, Janssens ACJW, Ransohoff DF. How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases? Genet Med. How can polygenic inheritance be used in population screening for common diseases? : Genetics in Medicine : Nature Publishing Group

Advances in genomics have near-term impact on diagnosis and management of monogenic disorders. For common complex diseases, the use of genomic information from multiple loci (polygenic model) is generally not useful for diagnosis and individual prediction. In principle, the polygenic model could be used along with other risk factors in stratified population screening to target interventions. For example, compared to age-based criterion for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening, adding polygenic risk and family history holds promise for more efficient screening with earlier start and/or increased frequency of screening for segments of the population at higher absolute risk than an established screening threshold; and later start and/or decreased frequency of screening for segments of the population at lower risks.

This approach, while promising, faces formidable challenges for building its evidence base and for its implementation in practice. Currently, it is unclear whether or not polygenic risk can contribute enough discrimination to make stratified screening worthwhile. Empirical data are lacking on population-based age-specific absolute risks combining genetic and non-genetic factors, on impact of polygenic risk genes on disease natural history, as well as information on comparative balance of benefits and harms of stratified interventions. Implementation challenges include difficulties in integration of this information in the current health-care system in the United States, the setting of appropriate risk thresholds, and ethical, legal, and social issues. In an era of direct-to-consumer availability of personal genomic information, the public health and health-care systems need to prepare for an evidence-based integration of this information into population screening.
 
Whole-Genome Sequencing In Health Care
Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics
European Journal of Human Genetics - Whole-genome sequencing in health care

In recent years, the cost of generating genome information has shown a rapid decline. High-throughput genomic technologies make it possible to sequence the whole exome or genome of a person at a price that is affordable for some health-care systems. More services based on these technologies are now becoming available for patients, raising the issue of how to ensure that these are provided appropriately.

In order to determine both the clinical utility of genetic testing and assure a high quality of the analysis, the interpretation and communication of the results must be discussed so that patients can receive appropriate advice and genetic testing. The Public and Professional Policy Committee (PPPC) and the Quality Committee of the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) addressed these challenges at a joint workshop in Gothenburg, Sweden, in 2010. PPPC also organised workshops in Amsterdam, the Netherlands (January 2011 in collaboration with the EU-funded project TECHGENE, January 2012).

A report for the Health Council of the Netherlands served as a background document for the PPPC’s reflections. Focusing on the clinical diagnostics setting, this paper is intended to contribute to the discussion and the development of guidelines in this fast-moving field, and provide recommendations for health-care professionals. The paper and recommendations were posted on the ESHG website from 20 June to 1 August 2012 for comment by the membership. The final version was approved by the ESHG Board in December 2012.
 
Trends In Genomic Medicine

Several themes are emerging in the diagnosis and treatment of disease.

(Left) First, as the knowledge of the genomic underpinnings of disease increases, the definition of “self” is likewise expanding. This self includes not just the germline human genome inherited from our parents but also somatic changes in the genomes of tumors, the genomes of commensal microbes that inhabit our body, and the genomes of pathogenic organisms.

Second, the influence of genomics on medicine is moving the diagnosis of diseases toward the earliest possible point in the course of disease, before clinical manifestation.

Third, genomic testing is occurring earlier in the life of a human, moving from adulthood to childhood, the neonatal period, and even prenatally.

(Right) Pharmacogenomic markers are being used in several ways:
• to select targeted therapies exemplified by the breast cancer marker HER-2 and treatment with the monoclonal antibody Herceptin;
• to predict likelihood of response, as in the case of the host IL28B genotype and response to interferon therapy in HCV infection;
• to enhance drug safety, for example, by testing for host HLA genotypes predictive of abacavir hypersensitivity in humans infected with HIV; and
• to optimize dosing of drugs, such as warfarin, based on genotypes indicative of rate of metabolism using, for example, the iWarfarin app.

11207


McCarthy JJ, McLeod HL, Ginsburg GS. Genomic Medicine: A Decade of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities. Science Translational Medicine 2013;5(189):189sr4. Genomic Medicine: A Decade of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities

Genomic medicine—an aspirational term 10 years ago—is gaining momentum across the entire clinical continuum from risk assessment in healthy individuals to genome-guided treatment in patients with complex diseases.

We review the latest achievements in genome research and their impact on medicine, primarily in the past decade. In most cases, genomic medicine tools remain in the realm of research, but some tools are crossing over into clinical application, where they have the potential to markedly alter the clinical care of patients.

In this State of the Art Review, we highlight notable examples including the use of next-generation sequencing in cancer pharmacogenomics, in the diagnosis of rare disorders, and in the tracking of infectious disease outbreaks. We also discuss progress in dissecting the molecular basis of common diseases, the role of the host microbiome, the identification of drug response biomarkers, and the repurposing of drugs.

The significant challenges of implementing genomic medicine are examined, along with the innovative solutions being sought. These challenges include the difficulty in establishing clinical validity and utility of tests, how to increase awareness and promote their uptake by clinicians, a changing regulatory and coverage landscape, the need for education, and addressing the ethical aspects of genomics for patients and society.

Finally, we consider the future of genomics in medicine and offer a glimpse of the forces shaping genomic medicine, such as fundamental shifts in how we define disease, how medicine is delivered to patients, and how consumers are managing their own health and affecting change.
 

Attachments

  • Trends-in-genomic-medicine.gif
    Trends-in-genomic-medicine.gif
    449.2 KB · Views: 13
FDA: 23andMe's Flagship DTC Genetic Testing Product is Misbranded
http://www.fda.gov/ICECI/EnforcementActions/WarningLetters/2013/ucm376296.htm

Genetic testing company 23andMe is the recipient of a 22 November 2013 Warning Letter from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for allegedly marketing its products without proper federal approval.

The company offers a direct-to-consumer genetic testing product which is used to analyze and predict a person's likelihood of eventually developing various health conditions or traits.

FDA, however, contends the company's Saliva Collection Kit and Personal Genome Service (PGS) is a medical device under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and, having not obtained FDA approval or clearance, is misbranded under the law.

The company's marketing of the device as a way to obtain information on "254 diseases and conditions" and a person's "carrier status," "health risks" and "drug response" were all flagged by FDA as being improper for an unapproved or un-cleared medical device. Also flagged were claims that the information could be used to "take steps toward mitigating serious diseases," such as diabetes, heart disease and breast cancer.

"Some of the uses for which PGS is intended are particularly concerning, such as assessments for BRCA-related genetic risk and drug responses (e.g., warfarin sensitivity, clopidogrel response, and 5-fluorouracil toxicity) because of the potential health consequences that could result from false positive or false negative assessments for high-risk indications such as these," FDA explained in its letter.

Regulators said a false-positive could result in unnecessary surgery and "other morbidity-inducing actions," while false-negative results could lead to a patient being less proactive about screening for risks.
 
A LETTER I WILL PROBABLY SEND TO THE FDA
A Letter I Will Probably Send To The FDA | Slate Star Codex

I predict that the current spat between 23andMe and the FDA will be less apocalyptic than some people fear. In particular, I expect 23andMe will submit a lot of paperwork, change some of their wording around, advertise a little less aggressively, stop listing some or all of their “Health Risks” and “Drug Interactions” section, and then be back on their feet in a few months.

But I’m not sure. And even that seems like a bad thing. Although I realize this is probably a very complicated legal game here, I’d like to add whatever pressure I can. So here is a letter I plan to send the FDA and maybe my Congressor once I figure out who that is. Please let me know about any factual errors, logical errors, or things I should change because they are unconvincing or offensive:
 
FDA vs. 23andMe: How do we want genetic testing to be regulated?
FDA vs. 23andMe: How do we want genetic testing to be regulated?

Yesterday the US Food and Drug Administration sent a letter to the human genetic testing company 23andMe giving them 15 days to respond to a series of concerns about their products and the way they are marketed or risk regulatory intervention. This action has set off a lot of commentary/debate about the current and future value of personal genomics, whether these tests should be available direct to consumers or require the participation of a doctor, and what role the government should play in regulating them.

I am a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for 23andme, but I am writing here in my individual capacity as a geneticist who wants to see human genetic data used widely but wisely (although I obviously have an interest in the success of 23andme as a company – so I can not claim to be unbiased).

1) Should a person be able to have their DNA sequenced and get the data?

2) Should a person who has had their genome sequenced be able to access scientific literature relevant to their genome?

3) Is there a role for third parties in helping people interpret their genome sequence?
 
An Update Regarding The FDA’s Letter to 23andMe
An Update On FDA's Letter to 23andMe | The 23andMe Blog

This is new territory for both for 23andMe and the FDA. This makes the regulatory process with the FDA important because the work we are doing with the agency will help lay the groundwork for what other companies in this new industry do in the future. It will also provide important reassurance to the public that the process and science behind the service meet the rigorous standards required by those entrusted with the public’s safety.

I am committed to making sure that 23andMe is a trusted consumer product. I believe that genetic information can lead to better decisions and healthier lives — a goal that all of us share.

We will provide updates as they become available.
 
In Israel, a Push to Screen for Cancer Gene Leaves Many Conflicted
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/27/h...cted.html?partner=rss&emc=rss&smid=tw-nytimes

Such family debates are playing out across Israel these days. The country has one of the highest rates of breast cancer in the world, according to a World Health Organization report.

And some leading scientists here are advocating what may be the first national screening campaign to test women for cancer-causing genetic mutations common among Jews — tests that are already forcing young women to make agonizing choices about what they want to know, when they want to know it and what to do with the information.
 
Back
Top