GLP at 60 weeks

Here2Learn

Member
There is data starting to come out of the trials showing all GLP-1’s plateau between 60-72 weeks no matter their bmi. I don’t see any data on how it is effecting their other health markers and if they continue to see success there.

Just wanted to share the data.



Very much my experience, I hit GW 1 year ago, continued exercise & glp. Watching Dexa and multiple blood tests recomposition continues. The weight has gone up but according to Dexa, blood markers and the mirror, muscle up, visceral fat down.
 
Last edited:
There is data starting to come out of the trials showing all GLP-1’s plateau between 60-72 weeks no matter their bmi. I don’t see any data on how it is effecting their other health markers and if they continue to see success there.

Just wanted to share the data.



It's what most of us that used them not for losing BW stated a long time ago.

It plateau because the body gets used to the side effect and so it's stop blunting the appetite etc.

I believe hope the glucose control continue to last because that's the only thing I care lol
 
They're sort of over complicating this. The plateau is a particular weight, at a particular dose. How long someone takes to get there isn't a factor. It's not some arbitrary amount of time and then GLPs stop working. If they titrated the dose higher, I'm certain they'd lose more until plateauing at that dose (to a limit of course).

There's no indication of weight being regained after a plateau is reached and staying on a maintainance dose, which is supported by the Sema and Tirz trials that went out up to 4 years,
 
It's what most of us that used them not for losing BW stated a long time ago.

It plateau because the body gets used to the side effect and so it's stop blunting the appetite etc.

I believe hope the glucose control continue to last because that's the only thing I care lol

If this were true, that they're like "diet pills" to which a tolerance develops and effects weaken, then you'd see weight regain over the long term on a maintainance dose. Based on 3 and 4 year extended trials, involving over 10,000 patients, that doesn't happen. Weight loss almost entirely happens in the first year, then maintained on the same dose for at least several more years (the limit of the trials).

You'd also expect the tolerance to fade after taking a break, and that doesn't happen either.

But these results are with pharma drugs, on a pharma protocol.

Plenty of anecdotal evidence that UGL users, particularly those who go off and back on repeatedly, develop increasingly weaker response, which lines up with the theory of immunogenicity development, "reexposure events" and of course all the unknown contaminants potentially contributing to its development.

When and if antibody tests become available at blood labs, something expected to become common for all protein based therapies in the future (so doctors can check patients who stop responding to various peptide drugs), it will be interesting to see how UGL users compare to those on pharma.
 
Last edited:
ehh if i am reading this article correctly, it said says semaglutide users at 2.4mg/week plateau at 60 weeks and mounjaro users at 5mg/week plateau at 60-72 weeks and then quote the article "but this was not the case on the higher doses. " i.e. if you continue to escalate the dose, the weight loss continues. this is consistent with what ghoul has said previously in that the body adapts to a dose at a weight and in order to to reach a new lower weight, one must up the dose.

this article is framed in a click bait manner to imply that any dose of GLP after 60 weeks simply stops and this is the 'shocking glp plateau no one is talking about'. fucking trash journalism.
 
Back
Top