Hello we are HGHPRO

That isn't going to help you at all! There is like two guys that like him on here. He is a liar.

Might be true, but I'm looking forward to this.
Just jumping into the world of GH, curious to know more.

And while Jano has been questionable, to me he has demonstrated a lot of knowledge. He was good at questioning Analyzer on some testing I did.
It's always been a hard decision as I have conflicting opinions of him.
 
Might be true, but I'm looking forward to this.
Just jumping into the world of GH, curious to know more.

And while Jano has been questionable, to me he has demonstrated a lot of knowledge. He was good at questioning Analyzer on some testing I did.
It's always been a hard decision as I have conflicting opinions of him.
You are one of the two I was talking about. I agree he is knowledgeable. He is also a liar and a serious douchebag. He can't be trusted as far as I am concerned, I don't care how knowledgeable he is
 
You are one of the two I was talking about. I agree he is knowledgeable. He is also a liar and a serious douchebag. He can't be trusted as far as I am concerned, I don't care how knowledgeable he is

To be honest I'm on the fence...

Whether it was selfish intentions or not... he's busted some testing people acting shady spewing bullshit. Which was good for people who don't know as much.

Then personally he's demonstrated that knowledge on some testing I've done with Analyzer. And has kinda helped me/the source to prevent some bad test results being released due to small mistakes leading to retesting.

However on the other side... I don't blindly turn my eye to what he's done either.

I've wanted to blind sample test him and probably will break down and do it one day.

I guess I find it a hard position to take.
 
Im willing to do that for a one time deal and only ONE time if you get free testing that means we will have no testing to reimburse so it makes it not so bad.
Cool, send me the payment details and I'll get that out in the next day or two. Also I will not be using Jano for my testing since he has a bad reputation here. I would hate to see your stuff come back fulldosed/overdosed or something like that but everyone still call bullshit because it was tested by Jano. I hope this works out well brother! I know many of us on here are looking for a new cheap growth hormone source.
 
Cool, send me the payment details and I'll get that out in the next day or two. Also I will not be using Jano for my testing since he has a bad reputation here. I would hate to see your stuff come back fulldosed/overdosed or something like that but everyone still call bullshit because it was tested by Jano. I hope this works out well brother! I know many of us on here are looking for a new cheap growth hormone source.
Shoot me an email at hghpro@tutanota.com
 
Come again ? I’ve no idea bc the
ledger is in Chinese

Where or what is the dimer peak?

What type of filtration process is being used to obtain a purity of
greater than 95% ?

In every SEC-HPLC the dimer peak is in front of the HGH peak as bigger molecules (dimer being twice as big as monomer HGH) elute first.

It can be explained by a single 50 second video.



Therefore it should be very obvious to anybody with basic education in the field, that the small peak in front of the big peak is, most likely, the dimer.

And the problem with this assay I’ve already mentioned members
have NO WAY of knowing WHAT substance was tested, bc the MW
remains UNKNOWN.
Actually, SEC-HPLC is used for determination of molecular weight, so it is all but unknown.

"Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), also known as molecular sieve chromatography, is a chromatographic method in which molecules in solution are separated by their size, and in some cases molecular weight."

Size-exclusion chromatography - Wikipedia

Is the MS depicting “1% dimerization” also a secret.

Try another board with your BULLSHIT

Buyer beware !!!!!!!!

MS is not used for determination of dimer at all in pharmaceutical settings as MS is suboptimal, compared to SEC-HPLC.

US Pharmacopoeia requires the use of SEC, not MS.

USP Monographs: Somatropin

LMAO !

You obviously have no idea what dimerization is, why it occurs and
which assay best reveals its occurance and/or frequency.

See above. Or would you like to dispute US Pharmacopoeia, Sir?

Would you care to explain what exactly is "frequency" of dimer?

But even though @janoshik can explain better im sure dimerization is essentially the part of the hgh that is not bio available from what i understand and caused by a couple different things however as ive said im not scientist.

Yes, dimerized HGH is not as bioavailable as monomer and is also a marker molecule for improper manufacture and/or storage.
 
In every SEC-HPLC the dimer peak is in front of the HGH peak as bigger molecules (dimer being twice as big as monomer HGH) elute first.

It can be explained by a single 50 second video.



Therefore it should be very obvious to anybody with basic education in the field, that the small peak in front of the big peak is, most likely, the dimer.


Actually, SEC-HPLC is used for determination of molecular weight, so it is all but unknown.

"Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), also known as molecular sieve chromatography, is a chromatographic method in which molecules in solution are separated by their size, and in some cases molecular weight."

Size-exclusion chromatography - Wikipedia



MS is not used for determination of dimer at all in pharmaceutical settings as MS is suboptimal, compared to SEC-HPLC.

US Pharmacopoeia requires the use of SEC, not MS.

USP Monographs: Somatropin



See above. Or would you like to dispute US Pharmacopoeia, Sir?

Would you care to explain what exactly is "frequency" of dimer?



Yes, dimerized HGH is not as bioavailable as monomer and is also a marker molecule for improper manufacture and/or storage.
This says a lot about you when nobody was saying anything out of ordinary about you and you jump right into a thread YOU WEREN'T EVEN TAGGED IN!!

YOU STAY IN YOUR OWN FUCKING THREAD BITCH! YOUR A SOURCE AND WE'VE SPOKEN ABOUT THIS ON NUMEROUS OCCASSIONS.

NOW BACK THE FUCK UP!
 
This says a lot about you when nobody was saying anything out of ordinary about you and you jump right into a thread YOU WEREN'T EVEN TAGGED IN!!

YOU STAY IN YOUR OWN FUCKING THREAD BITCH! YOUR A SOURCE AND WE'VE SPOKEN ABOUT THIS ON NUMEROUS OCCASSIONS.

NOW BACK THE FUCK UP!
where you been trt?
 
This says a lot about you when nobody was saying anything out of ordinary about you and you jump right into a thread YOU WEREN'T EVEN TAGGED IN!!

YOU STAY IN YOUR OWN FUCKING THREAD BITCH! YOUR A SOURCE AND WE'VE SPOKEN ABOUT THIS ON NUMEROUS OCCASSIONS.

NOW BACK THE FUCK UP!

Appreciate it brother we aren't always that fast but at least within 5-6 hours. Also @janoshik should be through here to interpret some things


@Logan44551 I hope you weren't referring to me as the 2nd guy who likes @janoshik that's just a weird thing to say. And I've never expressed any position like that. In fact I've clearly stated that I wouldn't use him.

@TRT seems like he was contacted through some other means bot tagging.

The whole stay in your source position is cool, if a source is trying to push his product in other threads, or bad mouthing his competition, or solicit...

But to get worked up about something like a post in a thread, it's silly. I'm betting @Millard Baker wouldn't ban someone(source or not) for engaging in conversation.
 
This says a lot about you when nobody was saying anything out of ordinary about you and you jump right into a thread YOU WEREN'T EVEN TAGGED IN!!

YOU STAY IN YOUR OWN FUCKING THREAD BITCH! YOUR A SOURCE AND WE'VE SPOKEN ABOUT THIS ON NUMEROUS OCCASSIONS.

NOW BACK THE FUCK UP!
Actually we did tag him and another member I believe and I'm glad he came because as was stated our purity by sec is over 99%
 
Guys I hear a lot of people may not like janoshik but I have yet to hear anyone say he wasn't knowledgeable and didn't know how to interpret graphs etc you guys are welcome to use any respectable testing service for our products as we have no dog in that fight
 
Guys I hear a lot of people may not like janoshik but I have yet to hear anyone say he wasn't knowledgeable and didn't know how to interpret graphs etc you guys are welcome to use any respectable testing service for our products as we have no dog in that fight

So the other side....

1st - He has came and personally attacked members on this board and threatened them. I believe leading to a ban in that regards. Maybe it was misinterpretation but sources don't get to bash other members like us members do.

2nd - A very well known member sent him GH. Jano took payment, and provided a test report. I believe. I don't think he faked the report but it wasn't from this members sample.
The member then received his sample back in the mail exposing the "fake" test report.
Lots has been said and there is more to the story...but the point is he lied and fucked someone. He's apologized blah blah blah

So it's not so much his knowledge is in question but his testing results. Noone knows if to believe him or not, or if he actually tests the product.
Next can he be bought for testing results. It's all these things that lead more to his integrity.

Has he apologized and tried to reestablish...yes
But how do we even know when it is credibile information back I think is the problem. And how do we even build that back up from him when testing options are limited.

That's the story...

It's more like, yes your samples could be sent and tested right. But they also could be lied about.

At least those are my thoughts...and what goes through my head when I have trouble knowning if I should test with him or not. As he has helped me.
 
Back
Top