How To Test Anastrozole For Legitamecy??

eminem93

New Member
Hello...


I have some anastrozole from MJR. I picked it up a while back when MJR was having pretty good reviews...

I am not able to identify if the product is legitamate througb reagant testing....


I use mandelin, marqus and mercke testing and sulfuric acid and there is no color change for any of them... I also tested a legitmate pharma pill of anastrozole for color reaction. None could be identifiedde... can anyone shed some insight so I can figute out is product legitamate... I want to know before I have to injest it obviously so a bloods test is too late if it is bunkk..



Does letrozole or any of the other anti -e's change color with these tests?? I might just go ahead and get a different product if I cant identify for sure
 
Dunno, but RC PCT is a little scary. We don't know if it's working until we start growing tits, which continue to grow while we wait for a replacement. Which could be coming from overseas. Which also might be bunk.
 
if you do not know anybody in the lab that is a problem

the only way is to do blood test before and after taking anastrozole and see if estrogen levels drop

how do you test nolva and clomid ?
 
if you do not know anybody in the lab that is a problem

the only way is to do blood test before and after taking anastrozole and see if estrogen levels drop

how do you test nolva and clomid ?


Mandekin
Marquis
Mercke..

They turn certaib colord
 
no this is peace of crap whatever you put inside it turns the same color

I tired this, it dose not work to have reliable results

you need some serious chemistry
 
There is no way a simple reagent tests can differentiate between SERMS. Heck NOT even HPLC in the absence of a stock solution can reliably perform that task.
 
Did you know the technique they are using IS essentially HPLC which Ive already eluded to?
 
Powersteroid has good and cheap Arimidex. I was near 7000 in test levels and Estroidal level just 25.
Now I'm probably around 10,000 had a flare up due to progesterone so I added some caber, and I'm gtg.
 
A test level of 7k ng/dl from an AI alone, NOT! But I'm glad your on Gaber to hamper those AAS related prolactin/progesterone side effects.
 
Wait...

UV/VIS spectrophotometry (watching the intensity of transmission of different "colors" of light, to simplify)...

Is "essentially" High Performance Liquid Chromatography (running a sample thru a column - filled usually with a substance similar to purified/glorified/overpriced sand - via a liquid under pressure, to simplify)...

(not)

Insert part where we will hear that a UV detector similar to a spectrophotometer is placed in the output to show when a specific part (called a fraction) is eluting (coming out) from the column. The difference being that it is used in a "yes/no" capacity as opposed to a "what and how much" capacity.

A simple "interesting paper, Walt" would have sufficed versus misdirection.

Sort of like the mantras about Labmax, TLC, and melting points.

A real CHEMIST doesn't NEED HPLC, GC/MS, GC/MS-MS, LC/MS, LC/MS-MS or even UV/VIS spec to identify and quantify an unknown.

Those tools are nice and in the right hands make life easier, but they are no more REQUIRED than is a Murcielago to run to Walgreens. You WANT a Lambo, you don't NEED one... LOL

A CHEMIST can use:

melting point
color tests
polarimetry
microscopy
TLC
and if available IR and UV/VIS
(among other techniques)

To identify and quantify (what and how much) an unknown.

Just like Russel Marker did.

Cheers,

Walt

PS: The next person who gets ready to say that melting points are useless should first go to the library and pick up a basic chemistry text and read why they are wrong and come back with the true story and the ONE pitfall/hard part - which CAN be overcome by the home scientist.
 
Melting points ARE WORTHLESS unless one is dealing with PURE COMPOUNDS and if you think that is what is being sold thru web based AAS sales sites, I've some prime real estate on the moon for you.

Finally this technique UV-A IS used in HPLC to identify the probability of a certain substance being present.

Otherwise explain their use of a calibration curve and the use of pharm grade Anastrazole tablet, purified as a stock solution.

But if you want to play with your chem set in that garage of yours your data will be even less accurate than LM
 
Jim,

Let's just put it this way.

ONE OF US was working at Pfizer at 17. I don't think it was you..

I've tried to be civil but it's time you go lay by your dish.
 
The fact that you had and still have no IDEA HPLC uses UV-A to not only QUALIFY but to also QUANTIFY sample compounds is telling of your ignorance in this field.

Finally bc the differences in UVl wavelengths and the color particular Wavelength may "emit" can be HUGE, the use of color saturation/desaturation is for AAS testing is highly inaccurate!
 
Jim,

Let's just put it this way.

ONE OF US was working at Pfizer at 17. I don't think it was you..

I've tried to be civil but it's time you go lay by your dish.

If you worked at Pfiizer you mopped the floors based on the crap you just spewed fella!

You simply don't know WTF your talking about, so stop PRETENDING you do!
 
For those curious about how "good" or bad an Elisa test, such as LM ,may be take a look at these ELISA assays from this site. I've posted ONE such test used for TESTOSTERONE (AAS) screening.

What's VERY IMPORTANT to check out, is this tests inability to detect TT exclusively. Nope it just lacks the specificity since the sample presence of either Nor-Test, in addition to Alpha and Beta DHT will trigger a false positive TT response.

So even this "hospital grade" analyses is NOT specific to testosterone!!!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
For those curious about how "good" or bad an Elisa test, such as LM ,may be take a look at these ELISA assays from this site. I've posted ONE such test used for TESTOSTERONE (AAS) screening.

What's VERY IMPORTANT to check out, is this tests inability to detect TT exclusively. Nope it just lacks the specificity since the sample presence of either Nor-Test, in addition to Alpha and Beta DHT will trigger a false positive TT response.

So even this "hospital grade" analyses is NOT specific to testosterone!!!


I thought this was not only interesting buy also potentially helpful for those interested in the 28AA peptide called Ghrelin. Recall it a secretagogue that's released from the stomach and may markedly effect one's appetite.

Nonetheless an ELISA is also available for Ghrelin, but what's particularly important is the specificity of THIS TEST is MUCH better than that of the TT assay discussed earlier

But now why is that?

The specific ELISA techniques being used for Ghrelin is considered "top of the line". It's called the "double antibody sandwich" technique and literally means a positive reaction only occurs if ANTIBODY binds to TWO SITES OPPOSITE EACH OTHER, much like a sandwich!
 
Really Jim?

We'll see who knows what. I truly hope you're an MD and not a stain on some chemistry grad program.

See, I've been working on how simple some of these analytical lab procedures can be made.

I'll be posting pics of routines: both lab standard and kitchen in tent.

Example:

Large sauté pan
5 glasses that hold at least ounces
Sand to fill bath
Thermometer
Coffee filter
Methanol
Distilled water.
A couple of droppers
A couple of glass plates

Voilà, purification by recrystallization.

Papers with the lab workflow and the kitchen workflow to follow

Maybe even some photomicrographs of those sexy sharp and shiny needles.

Suddenly we have a "standard" of, in this case, Testosterone Enanthate.

Soaponify to Test (NE) and one recrystallization later you have "standard" test (ne)

Wow, we've started. Mixed melting points of every Testosterone ester.

(Since you can saponify any impure test ester)




If you worked at Pfiizer you mopped the floors based on the crap you just spewed fella!

You simply don't know WTF your talking about, so stop PRETENDING you do!
 
Back
Top