ICN's or Iranian Test, which one?

---------------------------------------------

Snowblind said:
Which of these would you consider better? I'm trying to decide which one to go with. Your feedback is appreciated.


----IRANIANS-----fuck ICN----too much controversey and reports of no effects-------Iranian test amps have tested out to be over mg/ml and are a fine product. To be honest with you I used prolines test500 and got better results then using testovirons- alittle more pain and an odd smell but other then that I felt and saw more results.
 
Snowblind,I've never used Iranian test or ICN's,but there has been a lot of negative feedback about ICN stuff.I always used Cyp,Ent.and Sus.once,which
I'll never use again.You'd probably be better off with the Iranian,but if I had my choice,I'd always prefer Testex Cyp.
 
I don't know about now, but ICN's were the shit. Slightly Overdosed and work very well. I gained loads of mass on 3 ccs a week of Galenica's. Now things may be different though.
 
Even if you paid me $200 to use ICN Galenikas on my next cycle I wouldn't use them. There were HUNDREDS of guys about 6-10 months ago who used ICN's with absolutely ZERO gains - ZERO mass gains and ZERO strength gains. Bottom line ICN is a very fucking shady company with piss poor quality control. Anyone, and I mean ANYONE who shells out their hard-earned money on ICN's is a fucking retard.

dumbbellpress Future Husband of Jennifer Love Hewitt Cowboys 2004 NFL Champs
 
I have heard good and bad things about ICN's and I have never heard anything bad about Iranian test so IMO I would go with the Iranian's.
 
i thought it was the 158### lot that was the only one that reported negative feedback?... everyother lot i've heard of sounded good if not really good... correct me ifi'm wrong cause i'm thknin about them
 
Back
Top