In this thread.. I save you money

Why the anger merc, it is just another tool to have in the old tool belt.
I use strong acid at work and put it in the pool, heck my wife adds it to the whites lol (bleach)

This is an information board, information is a good thing.
You are sounding like you have a vested interest in Labmax.

actually bleach is a strong base lol..not trying to be a ass just messing with you bro.
 
merc u really are starting to sound like a salesman.all this is for educational purposes bro.we are all trying to learn.
 
Labmax modified their reagents fairly recently to get a better separation of color across the range of aas. Mandelins will probably do well for most tests, though. I had seen that writeup several months ago, but lost the link. @eminem93 thanks for posting it. I'm surprised it took as long as it did to surface.

Labmax took a simple concept and did a great job packaging and marketing it, and they improved the tests. I'm sure they can handle a little competition from the DIY crowd.
 
I don't think it was ever mandelin. They have been designing colorimetric tests for a long time, and appear to be very good at it.

So is it safe to assume that labmax uses a proprietary in-house made testing method that's probably not going to be disclosed to the public?
 
Last edited:
So is it safe to assume that labmax uses a proprietary in-house made testing method that will probably not be made available to the public?
Well, I did ask Myth if he could get the stuff analyzed a while back, but I never got an answer. Now that I think about it, I would feel guilty reverse engineering labmax's products. Not that I have any moral objection to someone else doing it. Intellectual property is an oxymoron IMO.
 
this is interesting article but he does not prove that it has anything do to with labmax.

Labmax proved to be reliable tool and I am not switching to some acid

it is over 20 years old article and it is a little short of labmax capability they do not even mention the UV light with is the most interesting part of labmax

I am not plying with some acid in my kitchen I still need a lab with GC/MS to validate the tests

so let's open new thread "acid test results"
 
Well, I did ask Myth if he could get the stuff analyzed a while back, but I never got an answer. Now that I think about it, I would feel guilty reverse engineering labmax's products. Not that I have any moral objection to someone else doing it. Intellectual property is an oxymoron IMO.
this is interesting article but he does not prove that it has anything do to with labmax.

Labmax proved to be reliable tool and I am not switching to some acid

it is over 20 years old article and it is a little short of labmax capability they do not even mention the UV light with is the most interesting part of labmax

I am not plying with some acid in my kitchen I still need a lab with GC/MS to validate the tests

so let's open new thread "acid test results"


fuk off mate

**fuk off only for mercury didn't mean too quote other dude
 
I have been around for a long time and I have seen a lot of guys pretending to be smart like suggesting to use lemon acid to test dianabol.

I have seen people talking about melting point, you just mix dianabol with some shit and you can have the same melting point what anavar.

This guy does not have any clue about chemistry and he is trying to be smarter than company which has serious laboratory and chemists working.

This article is over 20 years ago, the question comes why nobody used the acid to test before, and the answer might be simple that shit never worked.
 
I have been around for a long time and I have seen a lot of guys pretending to be smart like suggesting to use lemon acid to test dianabol.

I have seen people talking about melting point, you just mix dianabol with some shit and you can have the same melting point what anavar.

This guy does not have any clue about chemistry and he is trying to be smarter than company which has serious laboratory and chemists working.

This article is over 20 years ago, the question comes why nobody used the acid to test before, and the answer might be simple that shit never worked.


why is it referenced in Clarke's Analysis of Drugs and Poisins 4th edition published in 2011 then?? that textbook is used for criminal justice forensic courses.


gtfo you stupid shill
 
I have been around for a long time and I have seen a lot of guys pretending to be smart like suggesting to use lemon acid to test dianabol.

I have seen people talking about melting point, you just mix dianabol with some shit and you can have the same melting point what anavar.

This guy does not have any clue about chemistry and he is trying to be smarter than company which has serious laboratory and chemists working.

This article is over 20 years ago, the question comes why nobody used the acid to test before, and the answer might be simple that shit never worked.



I just looked through your entire post count... every post/thread you have is about labmax..............



GTFOO YOU GARBAGE SHILL!

Stop trying to suppress information from the community that will hurt your business..

At Meso members come 4 the truth......


I don't want people wasting hundreds of dollars on your rip off product anymore..

Im going to post this shit on other boards and make sure ur ass goes broke if u keep trying to discredit the information with nonsense replies.
 
post some tests of the acid this will contribute to the community in a new thread this might be more interesting.
 
Love the information.

Mercury, these tests are reliably used by law enforcement and have been used for a long time. They work and they are beyond simple. I don't understand what all the drama is about. If you don't like it, leave. You are wasting time and space.
 
"Other dude"? His name is Flenser, and given the topic of your thread and your interest in testing, I would think Flens would be like, one of your Meso board idols!:D
Flenser, Mythotik, Gunny, Angus... those dudes right there (and a couple others who I am forgetting since I am running on 2 hours sleep) are candidates for the Mt Rushmore of meso community testing.;)

And on that note - thank you to you Em93 for putting this out there for the community, and for going even a step beyond that by really diving into it and trying to find ways for us to implement it, even going the extra step of shopping the materials.

That said, I'll offer some FRIENDLY advice, take it or leave it and you won't hurt my feelings by choosing the latter. I think your message here would be better received by some without the anger and combative tone taken towards the dudes who have questioned your findings. You seem like an smart and inquisitive young fella (do I need to pay a royalty to Dr Jim for using his term "fella"?). It's only natural that you'll get members questioning and disagreeing with your findings. You'll be more effective in spreading your findings/message if you take the questioning as an opportunity to educate the naysayers, not try to defeat them. Facts are facts, opinions are opinions, and the members who will benefit from your post are smart enough to see which is which.

Okay, this is gonna be one helluva long jump down off of this soap box. Sorry for the lecture, brojo, just hate to see you handicap your own message and derail your own train with the arguing and attacks.
 
"Other dude"? His name is Flenser, and given the topic of your thread and your interest in testing, I would think Flens would be like, one of your Meso board idols!:D
Flenser, Mythotik, Gunny, Angus... those dudes right there (and a couple others who I am forgetting since I am running on 2 hours sleep) are candidates for the Mt Rushmore of meso community testing.;)

And on that note - thank you to you Em93 for putting this out there for the community, and for going even a step beyond that by really diving into it and trying to find ways for us to implement it, even going the extra step of shopping the materials.

That said, I'll offer some FRIENDLY advice, take it or leave it and you won't hurt my feelings by choosing the latter. I think your message here would be better received by some without the anger and combative tone taken towards the dudes who have questioned your findings. You seem like an smart and inquisitive young fella (do I need to pay a royalty to Dr Jim for using his term "fella"?). It's only natural that you'll get members questioning and disagreeing with your findings. You'll be more effective in spreading your findings/message if you take the questioning as an opportunity to educate the naysayers, not try to defeat them. Facts are facts, opinions are opinions, and the members who will benefit from your post are smart enough to see which is which.

Okay, this is gonna be one helluva long jump down off of this soap box. Sorry for the lecture, brojo, just hate to see you handicap your own message and derail your own train with the arguing and attacks.

Well said!
 
"Other dude"? His name is Flenser, and given the topic of your thread and your interest in testing, I would think Flens would be like, one of your Meso board idols!:D
Flenser, Mythotik, Gunny, Angus... those dudes right there (and a couple others who I am forgetting since I am running on 2 hours sleep) are candidates for the Mt Rushmore of meso community testing.;)

And on that note - thank you to you Em93 for putting this out there for the community, and for going even a step beyond that by really diving into it and trying to find ways for us to implement it, even going the extra step of shopping the materials.

That said, I'll offer some FRIENDLY advice, take it or leave it and you won't hurt my feelings by choosing the latter. I think your message here would be better received by some without the anger and combative tone taken towards the dudes who have questioned your findings. You seem like an smart and inquisitive young fella (do I need to pay a royalty to Dr Jim for using his term "fella"?). It's only natural that you'll get members questioning and disagreeing with your findings. You'll be more effective in spreading your findings/message if you take the questioning as an opportunity to educate the naysayers, not try to defeat them. Facts are facts, opinions are opinions, and the members who will benefit from your post are smart enough to see which is which.

Okay, this is gonna be one helluva long jump down off of this soap box. Sorry for the lecture, brojo, just hate to see you handicap your own message and derail your own train with the arguing and attacks.
 
Great post! Educational discussion, debate and disagreements are great, but the petty fighting takes away from the content. Thanks for the opinions of both.
 
Back
Top