In this thread.. I save you money

Agreed, I'd pay $50 all day long to mass spec my gear. All the websites and Universities I've contacted won't go near a controlled substance.
 
any will do it.


you guys are just going about it wrong.

you have to send it in anonymously as an unknown substance.. just say you think it may be hormonal.

if you say its supposed to be test, they wwill require you to have a special license from the DEA.

its better too if its one of those sites that posts the results on their own website.





make sure they will give you purity and not just identify what it is.
 
checkout ecstacydata.org

you can get around the rules...


do a spot test before you send it in, then just ask them to post your results as if it were MDMA.. this way they are allowed to post the exact active MG of whatever substance you submitted in relation to the total amount you submitted.
 
I don't really trust any1 that says they will do MS tests in the first place anyways...


Only select steroids can even be tested via ms. some can't..


""Can you test for hormones, such as HGH? Answer: No. Some steroids have hormone-like effects and can be detected, but in general hormone molecules are too big to validly identify in a GC/MS machine. GC/MS is capable of detecting and identifying compaounds up to around 1100 AMU (Atomic Mass Units). Molecules larger than 1100 AMU do not detect properly. The HGH molecule is 22,000 AMU, consisting of 191 amino acids. These types of substances do not work with the system our lab uses, which is oriented towards 'small' molecules.""
 
you gotta check if its already been done..

but on the main page Stanozolol, methyltestosterone, and anavar have already been sent in

so those are defiantly g2g.
 
A wide range of substances cannot be detected using the GC/MS testing done by DDL. When we surveyed non-experts as to what they thought "50% MDMA, 50% caffeine" would mean, they often made the mistake of assuming that it MDMA and Caffeine each made up 50% of the weight of the tablet or that there was some way of extrapolating from the percentage to a quantitative value of the amount of MDMA or caffeine in the pill. A 1 to 1 ratio could be represented validly as 50% to 50%. There is no way of knowing (from the data we receive from the lab) whether there is 1mg of each substance in the tablet or 100mg of each substance in the tablet. While the ratio notation is confusing and may baffle some visitors, we hope it will lead to less mistaken assumptions about the pill contents.

Why don't you display actual milligram quantitative amounts? #
In short, the DEA does not allow us to do so.

I might be wrong but it looks as if for something like anavar in isolation without any additional, you will get a 1 or a 0 and nothing else. No purity like Mythotik's.


fuark.. stupid expensive.. u can send it to a website thatll do mass spec for 50 bucks.

I don't really trust any1 that says they will do MS tests in the first place anyways...

Check Myth's thread

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/mass-spec-thread.134354881/

I guess you mean well, but when you have a contribution it looks like you have a habit of saying that what others have been doing here is stupid / expensive / a scam while telling everyone that questions you to fuck off and that half the site is hopelessly retarded. You can try and bring stuff to the board without all that, it'll go over a lot better
 
I might be wrong but it looks as if for something like anavar in isolation without any additional, you will get a 1 or a 0 and nothing else. No purity like Mythotik's.




Check Myth's thread

https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/mass-spec-thread.134354881/

I guess you mean well, but when you have a contribution it looks like you have a habit of saying that what others have been doing here is stupid / expensive / a scam while telling everyone that questions you to fuck off and that half the site is hopelessly retarded. You can try and bring stuff to the board without all that, it'll go over a lot better


fasho I come from good intentions thou. im just fucked up on Xanax half the time I check this website.


reread this part thou

"
checkout ecstacydata.org
you can get around the rules...
do a spot test before you send it in, then just ask them to post your results as if it were MDMA.. this way they are allowed to post the exact active MG of whatever substance you submitted in relation to the total amount you submitted.""
 
checkout ecstacydata.org

you can get around the rules...


do a spot test before you send it in, then just ask them to post your results as if it were MDMA.. this way they are allowed to post the exact active MG of whatever substance you submitted in relation to the total amount you submitted.


I can't see any recent test results on ecstasydata.org where they show the amount of API in any sample ( submitted as x or otherwise ) can you please link to an example ?

what may be of relevance to this thread is that they have tested many steroid samples using Marquis, Merke and Mandelin.
 
In another thread I asked what are the active ingredients in labmax. I got no responses other than smartass answers.

So I decided to do the research myself.

You can spot test all of them on your own hundreds of times for like $30 bucks..


https://do4a.com/attachments/jfs372920488-pdf.16983/

link is to a pdf called "the analysis and identification of steroids"

authors:

Diana M. Chiong, 1 B.A., Elaine Consuegra-Rodriguez, t B.S.,
and Jose R. Almirall, 1 M.S.


REFERENCE: Chiong, D. M., Consuegra-Rodriguez, E.. and Almirall, J. R., "The Analysis
and Identification of Steroids," Journal of Forensic Sciences, JFSCA, Vol. 37, No. 2, March
1992, pp. 488-502.


I would like to see more positive information on this forum shared.. We are a community and need to help each other out. Figure out more efficient ways of doing things together. I think everybody should be testing everything, posting the results of those tests online, and all of us doing these tests super cheaply, this will help the members of this community.
OK, here's what I have using mandalin reagent (it was very easy to do):

DFL Dbol-Pass
BD Adrol-Pass
DGL Adrol-Pass
MusclePup Test E-Fail
BD Dbol-Pass LFast-Dbol-Pass
Ascendant Deca-Fail
DGL Npp_ not on chart, dark red or purple
 
OK, here's what I have using mandalin reagent (it was very easy to do):

DFL Dbol-Pass
BD Adrol-Pass
DGL Adrol-Pass
MusclePup Test E-Fail
BD Dbol-Pass LFast-Dbol-Pass
Ascendant Deca-Fail
DGL Npp_ not on chart, dark red or purple
Did you have any UV results, or just under normal light?
 
Back
Top