It's not false information. Jano was waiting on clarification on the sample because the lable on one of the 2 vials was damaged. The vial was intact and there was nothing wrong with the sample. One vial is for TAMC and one for TYMC. Are you saying that a damaged label on one vial caused both to fail?Our USA lyapholization production is nowhere near the scale of our China production but there is no lie there. We just produced a fresh batch of overfilled Tirzepatide 30mg along with a few others. Our production in the US is still very small but we hope to expand it in the near future.
View attachment 296543
@Vinyard, no need to spread false information. It already has been proven the testing server mishandled that situation as the package arrived damaged/mishandled when arriving to Janoshik. The client that had ordered retested and the 15mg Tirz orange cap passed with flying colors.
View attachment 296545
@TestosTyrone , @SpicyMeatball
Also @PiscesMoon , to address your concern for the 2nd time. That is not true.
That's great you sent some to get retested. So which batch did you send your vendor tested vials from? All of your 15mg tirz batches have the same orange caps. Did you send from your first batch that failed the first test? Or from a different batch? Do you see the problem with a vendor supplying vials for a retest here? All we have is your word about what was sent and you're the only one with something to lose and everything to gain by lying. This is why testing by an independent party is important.
You can cut the shit by saying your client ordered the retest. Anyone who's paying attention knows who you are and that you ordered the retest yourself and sent the vials in. Tests supplied by vendors hold no weight at all.