Iron Panther: A new Raws Source

[ickyrica]

What a creative answer

Is that what you told your underage victim when they said "no" to your advances?

 

[ickyrica]

I agree bro...
Just by seeing the intro and from speculation only, it’s hard for me to believe this isn’t a rebrand from a source that’s already on here as a different source

edit; I like saying ‘source’

yeah, it's bound to happen.

 

[Jswole220]

Hey,

Welcome to the thread.

These aren't from our supplier. Using your supplier's in-house purity tests is like letting a student grade his own test. The incentives are all wrong.

We use this third party testing lab: www (dot) bjhgyjs (dot) com

Who is this company doing testing? I’ve never heard of them and for that reason I don’t trust the reports. How do we know you don’t own that domaine? How do we know this is an actual legit testing facility. Surely if they were some of us would have herd of them.
Where’s our meso IT tech investigation team to look into this website and domain and see what kind of dirt or lies we can uncover?

 

[ickyrica]

The sources background is already known. I'm trying to scam free gear off him first, then I'll let everyone know the details. I think I have a kilo of tren out of him already

 

[ickyrica]

That's a joke folks

 

[Villain]

Chuck Norris, of course.

Oh please. One of the Gracie brothers made him tap.

 

[bolder]

yeah, it's bound to happen.

Why couldn’t it have been Unicorn Raws instead?
When Unicorns do show up, I’m definitely stocking up on some mystical raws!

 

[ickyrica]

Why couldn’t it have been Unicorn Raws instead?
When Unicorns do show up, I’m definitely stocking up on some mystical raws!

Lucky charms raws. Company branding is a pot of gold

 

[All Nats McGee]

Maybe he is trying to make it seem blatantly obvious that it is panda to gain trust. Then make the prices better and scam you.

All of pandas other ventures have Pretty legit websites. The average joe can me a domestic lab easy but a new international raw supplier is a different ball game.

 

[ickyrica]

Maybe he is trying to make it seem blatantly obvious that it is panda to gain trust. Then make the prices better and scam you.

that's an interesting take on what's happening. Not out of the realm of possibility at all. Those would be some good dummy pics of raws however mylar bags are cheap enough if one was inclined. Anything else you notice that stands out?

 

[ThyNoah]

Thank you for the thoughtful questions regarding our raws.

1. Yes, we test every batch of raws we receive from the factory. We purchase new batches roughly every two months on average.

2. Each batch of raws has its own report. This helps us keep track of who has received raws from which batch. We keep track of batch numbers and batch purchase dates so that if problems do arise with our raws we would be able to quickly figure out which batch it was and get a handle on it quickly.

3. It comes out to $30 per test from the analytical lab we use.

4. We receive results back within 3 days and we do not sell the batch until we review the results. We have a registered company here with which we have signed a contractual agreement with the factory regarding purity. If the purity is -3% from what they state it should be, we can return the product for a refund of the 70% deposit we pay before receiving the products and test reports.

If that isn't satisfactory we can have them exchange the batch for a different one. Thus far this has not occurred. In the event of an exchange we would test the exchanged batch just like any other so as to prevent another problem before it starts.

5. They are a government accredited testing lab here that is willing to test samples for businesses.

On that note, it's getting late here and I'm going to sleep. I will be checking this thread frequently and answering questions.

I should be back on tomorrow at around 9pm-10pm EST.

Ok so I wanted to draw this out but I figure I put it all into one post. So for anyone interested his responses to my questions are right there.

So this a a government accredited testing lab you stated in answer #5

After reviewing all of your attachments why is it that your Tren Ace and Tren Eth reports you posted seem like there is something off with them. For illustrational purposes let me put them side by side for you:



Ok so now, can you please explain how this highly accredited government testing lab could possibly give you the same exact graph for both samples? One is 99.22 and the other is 99.29 yet the graph is exactly the same.
Could this of been falsified on your part or your so called “accredited lab”?

Well if we want to do a further analyses of this document it brings me to the next topic.
Asides the fact that you have two different samples with the same exact graph utilized in the report, why would this report have the same exact graph as your two samples as well:




Ok so now if we compare this report to your other two sample reports we conclude that they all some how have the same graph.

Asides from the graph being the same you can see the format is very similar and just the fonts and format itself is slightly off.

So now. What have we concluded here?
That PPL has a testing lab that falsifies results for other sources? Or that you faked all these labs ? Or you are actually an alternate handle and actually working with PPL?

Either way the facts are very clear, two of your samples have the same graph as the same sample on PPL website and your integrity has now been completely shattered.

For you to dare return with an elaborate justification of how this could be possible would be incredibly insulting, rather admittance if either falsifying or just being PPL or simply both.

But please don’t come back with playing the victim I didn’t know I had no idea either card.

We patiently await your response @IronPantherLabs

 

[ickyrica]

And boom goes the dynamite...

 

[ickyrica]

Anything else you notice that stands out

@Noah86 found it.

 

[ickyrica]

So now. What have we concluded here?
That PPL has a testing lab that falsifies results for other sources? Or that you faked all these labs ? Or you are actually an alternate handle and actually working with PPL?

This theory was just floated

Maybe he is trying to make it seem blatantly obvious that it is panda to gain trust. Then make the prices better and scam you

Who knows?

 

[ickyrica]

What do you think @MindlessWork? You always come swooping in with wisdom and insight that saves the day. What has been missed? Any angles left uncovered that you can tell?

 

[PurplePanther]

Ok so I wanted to draw this out but I figure I put it all into one post. So for anyone interested his responses to my questions are right there.

So this a a government accredited testing lab you stated in answer #5

After reviewing all of your attachments why is it that your Tren Ace and Tren Eth reports you posted seem like there is something off with them. For illustrational purposes let me put them side by side for you:

View attachment 129477

Ok so now, can you please explain how this highly accredited government testing lab could possibly give you the same exact graph for both samples? One is 99.22 and the other is 99.29 yet the graph is exactly the same.
Could this of been falsified on your part or your so called “accredited lab”?

Well if we want to do a further analyses of this document it brings me to the next topic.
Asides the fact that you have two different samples with the same exact graph utilized in the report, why would this report have the same exact graph as your two samples as well:

View attachment 129478


Ok so now if we compare this report to your other two sample reports we conclude that they all some how have the same graph.

Asides from the graph being the same you can see the format is very similar and just the fonts and format itself is slightly off.

So now. What have we concluded here?
That PPL has a testing lab that falsifies results for other sources? Or that you faked all these labs ? Or you are actually an alternate handle and actually working with PPL?

Either way the facts are very clear, two of your samples have the same graph as the same sample on PPL website and your integrity has now been completely shattered.

For you to dare return with an elaborate justification of how this could be possible would be incredibly insulting, rather admittance if either falsifying or just being PPL or simply both.

But please don’t come back with playing the victim I didn’t know I had no idea either card.

We patiently await your response @IronPantherLabs

while faking the testosterone acetate report he also forgot a space in front of the CST in date acquired field

different from all other reports which is kinda weird for automatical generated document

hmm

hey @IronPantherLabs i can fake those for $29.99 for you in just 2 days can I get your business? photoshop is all ready

 

[ickyrica]

 

[Villain]

while faking the testosterone acetate report he also forgot a space in front of the CST in date acquired field

different from all other reports which is kinda weird for automatical generated document

hmm

hey @IronPantherLabs i can fake those for $29.99 for you in just 2 days can I get your business? photoshop is all ready

Whose previous incarnation are you?

 

[ickyrica]

automatical

I was going to make fun of you for using a fake word... But it's real...

 

[Konrev]

If you put the tren ace and tren e reports in 2 tabs and switch back and forth you notice that the tren ace report graph is missing the watermark that all other tesing reports have. So the graph for the tren ace is 100% fake.