Is there a firm link of low estradiol having a negative impact on the lipid profile?

mranak

New Member
SWALE and others,

Do we know for certain if low estradiol levels directly impact HDL? SWALE's paper mentioned that excessively low estradiol can be very bad for the lipid profile (and other things) and therefore, for a long time, I assumed a direct connection. But I have seen some studies recently that have brought me back to question the link between low estradiol and HDL. Unfortunately, none of these studies have been done with post-adolescent men, likely because the aromatase inhibitors are only indicated (in the US) for post-menopausal women.

This study indicates that Arimidex (Anastrozole) has no impact on plasma lipid levels, but Femara (Letrozole) and Aromasin (Exemestane) do have a negative impact:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12538502&dopt=Abstract

This study indicates that Aromasin (Exemestane) "...has no detrimental effect on cholesterol levels...":
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...d&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14760111&query_hl=3

This study indicates that "Preliminary data demonstrate that anastrozole increases the risk of arthralgias and produces a decrease in bone density. In contrast, exemestane appears to favorably affect bone density and lipid profile*":
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12800793&dopt=Abstract

Thus study compares cardiovascular risk for post-menopausal women w/early breast cancer taking tamoxifen (Nolvadex) compared to Anastrozole (Arimidex) and concludes "that in our study anastrozole had a beneficial effect on lipid profiles of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer after 12 weeks of treatment.":
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...d&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=15788292&query_hl=1

Somewhat related. Study showing a potential link between estradiol associated with HDL and stimulation of eNOS: http://www.jci.org/cgi/content/full/111/10/1579

And then there are these four studies. The first is again done on postmenopausal women and shows an unfavorable effects on the lipid panel from Letrozole (I'm seeing a trend here: Letrozole is always bad), but the three other studies are done on adolescent males and (apparently) indicate no apparent impact on lipids:
http://steroidology.com/forum/showthread.php?t=77328

I realize that many studies can be torn apart. My wife learned all about how to find problems with studies at school. But this is all I have to go on at this time. For example, perhaps SWALE has observed anecdotal evidence, although I know that SWALE is probably careful not to bring estradiol down too low, so perhaps not.
 
Last edited:
SWALE said:
Let's also take a look at estrogen and endothelial function.
I did and I found that link to Baylor Med School lipid management review.

So, as I understand it, endolethial function refers to the inner lining of arteries, veins, etc. If you have good endolethial functioning, the arties and veins are plastic, they can contract and expand as needed. If you have poor endolethial functioning, they (veins and arteries) are rigid. Estrogen is one of the substances that maintains good endolethial functioning. Even the HERS study, which used equine estrogen, demonstrated this.

As the heart powers the brain, good endolethial functioning is necessary to optimal brain functioning. This is just one of the ways that estrogen is neuroprotective.
 
Mranak,

Just for fun, you and your wife should review the WHI and HERS studies. She, especially, will want to beware of anyone whose practice of HRT for women is based solely on these studies.
 
Of note, we have to be careful about extrapolating conclusions concerning male physiology from studies conducted on females.
 
Back
Top