Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.


Why didn't BA/BB show up on the first GCMS as it has in others?
Maybe I'm not understanding something correctly
View attachment 376572
If you keep bumping the same email thread it puts it deeper and deeper into their que@janoshik please have an employee help finish up my gcms i paid for days and days ago, i have asked for confirmation that they received payment and i have bumped daily the same email and ZERO response during business hours, i fully understand if there is a delay or just backup but would be nice to know my bitcoin did not just disappear...this gcms is very important right now and my customers expect it and i need to have it done as soon as your able to get around to me my email is ClearPharmacy@proton.me
thank you
Because it is not in the GCMS database.@janoshik - Could you share your thoughts on why Trestolone (7α-methyl-19-nortestosterone) is being identified as “Androst-5-en-7-one, 3-(acetyloxy)-, (3.beta.)-” on GCMS, yet it showed up correctly on the HPLC?
Janoshik Analytical
View attachment 376507
Thanks. That makes sense. Forgive me in advance if this is an ignorant question, as I don’t know the process, but is this an opportunity to add it?Because it is not in the GCMS database.
I frankly don't know how, but I tasked our GCMS team with finding out. I tried a couple years ago and failed utterly.Thanks. That makes sense. Forgive me in advance if this is an ignorant question, as I don’t know the process, but is this an opportunity to add it?
yeah they let me know. my bad.If you keep bumping the same email thread it puts it deeper and deeper into their que
Are you putting processes and procedures in place to correct for this? It makes trusting these expensive reports rather difficult when portions are missing.
Test C + E 400 and Test C 250 have been tested and I have the results. Both came out under dosed, still within the 5% error margin that Janoshik gives for the results.
However, the gap between the Test C and E in the C+E 400 brew made me ask for a retest, since it would mean the raws are ~92% and ~90% purity in reality instead of 96%+ which they both tested at, and would be unlikely.
They are being put it in vials anyway since it's still in acceptable range(if results are correct), so these are coming next week.
For Test E 250 and Test E 400, we're still waiting for the results.
Sent 10+ samples to Jano and 6+ to Analiza, shop is closed but I haven't stopped working and planning ahead.
Lots of labtest incoming!
New HGH 240+ IU too!
Raws, oils, and trest E raw
I have received a blind test of my test C.
I'm fairly disappointed about it and I have no clue how it came out like this. I overdosed it of 3% because I wanted it as precise as possible, it came out 4 .5% under instead. So unless I can't follow numbers on a screen (possible) I just don't know.
Anyway for transparency there is...
MESO-Rx Sponsor Post in thread 'Neo Anabolics (US DOMESTIC)'
Jano replied back to me, he stated that the vial of dbol was heated and mixed before testing. I used the Dinfar calculator, the raws were tested 98% a year ago. I know for a fact they did not degrade 20% and my measuring was not the issue because I wrote everything down. So, I am not sure where the issue was. Very baffled by this. Maybe someone smarter than me can pin point it.
Good Monday fellas!
Got a few test results back today but just the finished oils samples I sent in. Still waiting on the raw test results.
Here are the 3 finished oils below.
Not sure what happened with the Deca300(MCT). My measurements were right on, I accounted for the 91% purity and did a 2% overdose. Over the years with Jano, it seems Deca is always a problem child, at least for me. I've had numerous Deca samples come back low even after taking purity and overdose % into account. Is there any possible explanation as to why this might happen? @janoshik
The EQ300 and Test...
Unfortunately we also received a few poor results. We believe the TNE was crashed from the looks of the sample picture so we will be sending again with a note to warm before testing.
Hi @janoshik
We're seeing an increase in results that are "off" across vendors. Do you know if there have been any changes in your processes over the past few months? Are the recent hires following proper procedures?
