Den84
Well-known Member
as a title, if someone has bought both Please he can say which works best. Thank you
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i've used the labmax dbol/anadrol test kit. it worked exactly the way it stated it would.
as a title, if someone has bought both Please he can say which works best. Thank you
Maybe NOT the one with undisclosed reps who shamelessly and transparently attempts to discredit any member who is critical of its product, who promotes analytical lab testing methods or who is perceived as competition.
I think they're both unreliable at best. Could be just me but I don't trust them at all
Define “best, bc since neither of these reagent assay companies have cited evidence based upon more accurate testing such as LC/MS, so it’s anyones GUESS which one is better or worse.
Fact is there’s no way to KNOW what this form of testing is good for in the absence of evidence based comparisons, but that’s the compromise when folk are unwilling to pay for definitive testing, unreliable results.
Jim
I still remember a member here (forget his name) tested NPP with a labmax kit a while ago. I believe it was pharmacom if I remember correctly. He got a completely negative result with the labmax test, it was then sent into simec and their test came back perfectly dosedI know that the labs test are more reliable (simec, analizer..) I have already sent a sample to analizer, and I was satisfied. But in the sample there was not the declared active substance. my idea is the following: first text the sample with roid test and if the result is positive (the declared molecule is present) then I will send the sample to analizer. It makes no sense to pay to know the dosage if In the sample there is no declared molecule.
as a title, if someone has bought both Please he can say which works best. Thank you
Interestingly,Define “best, bc since neither of these reagent assay companies have cited evidence based upon more accurate testing such as LC/MS, so it’s anyones GUESS which one is better or worse.
Fact is there’s no way to KNOW what this form of testing is good for in the absence of evidence based comparisons, but that’s the compromise when folk are unwilling to pay for definitive testing, unreliable results.
Jim
Interestingly,
these simple and cheap tests are backed by proper scientific methods
Labmax-like roid tests with cheap Ebay chemicals? Here's how
BTW, neither Labmax nor RoidTest want you to have any cheap, effective and proven tests.
They'd lose their revenue.
I know that the labs test are more reliable (simec, analizer..) I have already sent a sample to analizer, and I was satisfied. But in the sample there was not the declared active substance. my idea is the following: first text the sample with roid test and if the result is positive (the declared molecule is present) then I will send the sample to analizer. It makes no sense to pay to know the dosage if In the sample there is no declared molecule.
A final word of advice IMO providing the involved compound is NOT in “raw form, neither SIMEC or Analyzer should require customers to divulge WHAT AAS is “supposed” to be present or its concentration, bc that’s what YOU are paying them to ascertain
The conclusion is to not trust either and especially not people on the internet which lack both the wits and the education.Very interesting your thread. So in conclusion you recommend roid test ?
Very interesting your thread. So in conclusion you recommend roid test ?
Based upon these LE screening devices for "drugs of abuse", false POSITIVE rates for AAS are likely to very close to what was observed this study on amphetamines.
What does that mean exactly ---- a D-bol "positive" LM assay may represent TESTOSTERONE
Generally these tests go for the main base structure. Basically they could trip on anything with a 4 ring hormone structure