As I always say, LM can only tell you what something is not. I wouldn't bet on it being mast e. Was there an initial green color to the a-vial, like in the first 10 seconds?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I always say, LM can only tell you what something is not. I wouldn't bet on it being mast e. Was there an initial green color to the a-vial, like in the first 10 seconds?
No, that picture is like 15 seconds after. It went straight to that orange-red color...As I always say, LM can only tell you what something is not. I wouldn't bet on it being mast e. Was there an initial green color to the a-vial, like in the first 10 seconds?
It's definitely not mast prop. I meant if the label says it is A and the test looks like B, all you really know is that it is NOT A. It does look like mast e, though.No, that picture is like 15 seconds after. It went straight to that orange-red color...
You mean you wouldn't bet on it being mast prop? Or is that a wrong assumption?
That's all that matters, it was sold as mast prop, I'm pretty frustratedIt's definitely not mast prop. I meant if the label says it is A and the test looks like B, all you really know is that it is NOT A. It does look like mast e, though.
yeah, they should all look pretty similar without UV, if it was MAST E, MAST P shouldn't look even remotely like MAST E TEST E or TEST P, that's the issue. If you look at the UV pictures of this mast, and compare it to the UV pictures of MAST E on LM's site, it's almost identical. Which is shitty because I have no idea what the concentration is, nor if it's purely only MAST E in it, not to mention I wanted the short ester, not the long ester, which is why this is trash for me.I have mast p, test e, and test p vial a and b without UV all pulled up right and i cant really see a difference between any of them. same with vial B under UV, except test P looks clearer...
yeah, they should all look pretty similar without UV, if it was MAST E, MAST P shouldn't look even remotely like MAST E TEST E or TEST P, that's the issue. If you look at the UV pictures of this mast, and compare it to the UV pictures of MAST E on LM's site, it's almost identical. Which is shitty because I have no idea what the concentration is, nor if it's purely only MAST E in it, not to mention I wanted the short ester, not the long ester, which is why this is trash for me.
Yes you are right, but if you look at the second LM i did of this compound, vial A has the purple color that under UV just like Mast E does on the LM site. We can speculate what it is or isn't, but we can at least say it's not Mast P, which is the issue at hand.what's the carrier oil, any idea?
from the labmax site the biggest difference between mast e and mast p is not the UV light but vial A and B. mast P vial A is green-yellow, have we seen any mast P pass vial A labmax?
GSO, from what I remember from other posts and people asking him. That's why the colors of the Test and NPP are muted, and that is why I am sure they are a pass, because enough of the bright color was present and I know GSO mutes the UV light. I am not trying to nitpick or anything here. I just am very certain this is not Mast P. I am fine with the NPP results, Test E and Test P as well, the Mast isn't any more expensive than the Test, so I'm not looking for a freebie or a hand out. I just feel like with what I went through to get this order, I deserve at least decent gear.what's the carrier oil, any idea?
from the labmax site the biggest difference between mast e and mast p is not the UV light but vial A and B. mast P vial A is green-yellow, have we seen any mast P pass vial A labmax?