I like this Mike, your posts here have been informative and nice to read.Nothing excites me quite like a discussion on back training with a bunch of bodybuilders who don't suck.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like this Mike, your posts here have been informative and nice to read.Nothing excites me quite like a discussion on back training with a bunch of bodybuilders who don't suck.
I disagree weight does matter. But it has to be with good form and controlled. No we aren’t weightlifters per se but weight lifting is what allows us to build bigger muscles. The more weight you can move correctly the bigger your muscle will be.Cashton I have an ok back I think and from experience you will see results if younfollow my advice here: always get a full range of motion, good contractions slow controlled negatives and forget about weight. It doesnt matter what you can lift. Im dead serious. You are not a weignt lifter right? Then dont train like one.
Other than that genetics time and consistency will make you or they will break you.
Absolutely weight matters.I disagree weight does matter. But it has to be with good form and controlled. No we aren’t weightlifters per se but weight lifting is what allows us to build bigger muscles. The more weight you can move correctly the bigger your muscle will be.
I’d say when done correctly weight matters most. When done correctly progressive overload is the way to grow a muscle. If form, mmc, and range of motion are bad then you’re not doing the movement. It doesn’t have to be perfect though.Absolutely weight matters.
I feel like form, ROM and mind-muscle connection matter more, but being able to do bent over rows 315 x 10 is going to be more effective than 225 x 10, all other factors being the same.
I disagree weight does matter. But it has to be with good form and controlled. No we aren’t weightlifters per se but weight lifting is what allows us to build bigger muscles. The more weight you can move correctly the bigger your muscle will be.
View: https://youtu.be/XWuZho21q_c
Dont wanna share my opinion because i m not developed at a level i could speak on this topic… I just wanted to share this vid of Rich Piana because i like it a lot.. he was humble and legit..
And remember once Milos Sarcev wrote on one instagram post that he showed to his clients that they could get legs fucked just with their bodyweight (more or less) in the unloaded hack squat, just focusing on mechanical tension without any kind of rest at bottom or high end..
Youd be wrong at least from.my experience. I can row 405x6-8 on any given day and trust me I have- not just dozens of times either. Over the years I have gotten extremely good at rowing and right now my working weight on overhand rows is 315x10-12 reps. I can go heavier, but I lose something in the process. My back is easily its biggest ever right now. I can.do whatever I want at this point and I am getting the most out of slightly less weight but I get better contractions and i have control on the negative that I lose going heavier.I’d say when done correctly weight matters most. When done correctly progressive overload is the way to grow a muscle. If form, mmc, and range of motion are bad then you’re not doing the movement. It doesn’t have to be perfect though.
Look at the weight Nick Walker uses. Nick Walker is a failure training progressive overload guy. and Phil Heath is genetic freak but he’s not lifting light he also hasn’t gotten bigger year to year.Youd be wrong at least from.my experience. I can row 405x6-8 on any given day and trust me I have- not just dozens of times either. Over the years I have gotten extremely good at rowing and right now my working weight on overhand rows is 315x10-12 reps. I can go heavier, but I lose something in the process. My back is easily its biggest ever right now. I can.do whatever I want at this point and I am getting the most out of slightly less weight but I get better contractions and i have control on the negative that I lose going heavier.
Back training is incredibly complex if you want to get.it right. Unlike other bodyparts which you can almost force to grow if you are training back too heavy other muscles will rob your back of their workload and you might not even notice. On top of that ROM is critical. Train your back too heavy gives you pancake back syndrome like nasser and hassan mostafa. Yeah, you are moving lots of weight, but getting shit out of it.
Phil Heath actually has really good input on the subject. So does Nick Walker.
Yes, but adding weight isn’t the only way to accomplish progressive overload. Adding reps or additional sets, altering the tempo of reps etc. are forms of progressive overload, as well. You essentially just need to increase the stimulus on the muscle over time.When done correctly progressive overload is the way to grow a muscle. If form, mmc, and range of motion are bad then you’re not doing the movement. It doesn’t have to be perfect though.
You’re absolutely correct. With all of those the muscle is getting stronger. Eventually though you’re going to have to add weight otherwise we could all just get massive using cans of soupYes, but adding weight isn’t the only way to accomplish progressive overload. Adding reps or additional sets, altering the tempo of reps etc. are forms of progressive overload, as well. You essentially just need to increase the stimulus on the muscle over time.
I don’t disagree that weight does matter, that would be a silly argument, but there are other ways to progress outside of just adding weight to the bar. Going to failure, band work and beyond failure techniques are good examples as well.
Youd be wrong at least from.my experience. I can row 405x6-8 on any given day and trust me I have- not just dozens of times either. Over the years I have gotten extremely good at rowing and right now my working weight on overhand rows is 315x10-12 reps. I can go heavier, but I lose something in the process. My back is easily its biggest ever right now. I can.do whatever I want at this point and I am getting the most out of slightly less weight but I get better contractions and i have control on the negative that I lose going heavier.
Back training is incredibly complex if you want to get.it right. Unlike other bodyparts which you can almost force to grow if you are training back too heavy other muscles will rob your back of their workload and you might not even notice. On top of that ROM is critical. Train your back too heavy gives you pancake back syndrome like nasser and hassan mostafa. Yeah, you are moving lots of weight, but getting shit out of it.
Phil Heath actually has really good input on the subject. So does Nick Walker.
You’re absolutely correct. With all of those the muscle is getting stronger. Eventually though you’re going to have to add weight otherwise we could all just get massive using cans of soup
what do you think on the part that starts at 1:55? Would like to hear your opinion on it,
i m still unable to train so i didnt try it yet but its promising… i tried the partial first part of the movement with big weight for lot of reps as suggested by Meadows, but didnt try the second half of the lateral raise like Jeff does in this vid
View: https://youtu.be/YFLqFjY3Q5Y
Opinions please @NLM36 and whoever wanna share his thoughts
Could you imagine how big your delts would be if you did that for 15-20 reps but worked up to 30-40lbs over time?dont think anyone said to use the same light weights, obv you re meant to increase weight as you re stronger…. And obv using light weights babe to properly isolate target muscle imply that you couldnt add techniques like cheating and so on
Could you imagine how big your delts would be if you did that for 15-20 reps but worked up to 30-40lbs over time?
You definitely want to isolate the muscle as much as possible. There’s a difference in how a bodybuilder should bench press, squat, etc vs a power lifter. It always bugs me when people use powerlifters with smaller chests who bench big weights as an example of weight doesn’t matter. It’s comparing apples to oranges.i made a mistake, i mean that you could using light weights to isolate and then even adding cheating and other techniques, but isolating muscle with proper weight think its fundmental , for someone at least
You definitely want to isolate the muscle as much as possible. There’s a difference in how a bodybuilder should bench press, squat, etc vs a power lifter. It always bugs me when people use powerlifters with smaller chests who bench big weights as an example of weight doesn’t matter. It’s comparing apples to oranges.
Master the weight before you add more. Lift it properly, but at some point in order to kept growing you’re going to have to get stronger. My goal is to over time be able to get as strong as possible on all of my movements.
what do you think on the part that starts at 1:55? Would like to hear your opinion on it,
i m still unable to train so i didnt try it yet but its promising… i tried the partial first part of the movement with big weight for lot of reps as suggested by Meadows, but didnt try the second half of the lateral raise like Jeff does in this vid
View: https://youtu.be/YFLqFjY3Q5Y
Opinions please @NLM36 and whoever wanna share his thoughts
By the way jeff cavaliere hey hes cool has good ideas. But as far as who should you really listen to Meadows all the fucking way.
