I'll explain how the mg/mL were determined for the two gray caps tested, even though you could have figured it out yourself.
AS1776-3 GRAY CAP
The formula used was:
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
The figures inside the {} are from the Humatrope standard and can be found
here.
Using the formula,
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
{3.72 mg/ml / 65,493,455} x 25,231,986 = 1.4 mg/ml
y = 1.4 mg/ml
AS1776-1 GRAY CAP
The formula used was:
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
The figures inside the {} are from the Humatrope standard and can be found
here.
Using the formula,
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
{3.72 mg/ml / 65,493,455} x 24,773,978 = 1.4 mg/ml
y = 1.4 mg/ml
AS1625-2 rhGH HUMATROPE STANDARD
{3.72 mg/ml (AS1625-2 rHGH) / x1(peak area)} *x2 (peak area) = y mg/ml
{3.72 mg/ml / 65,493,455} x 65,493,455 = 3.72
As you can see, there were no errors with the mathematics, the chemist didn't use the "wrong equation," and nothing was hidden or withheld. The results are correct.
The question now becomes whether or not you will accept the results or try to find another way to discredit the test. Obviously, that was a rhetorical question.
