Mass Spec Thread

All that post is saying, is that two different forms of measurement yield the same data. Using peak integration, or ion count can yield total amounts of molecular wright. Am I missing something?
 
They can determine ion count for a particular molecule, and get a percentage of the total ion count.
 
I've read that Test E is 72% testosterone and 28% ester. So in 100mg of Test E is there actually only 72mg test, but we still call it 100mg or is there 100mg of test and ~38mg ester? If it's the previous case, this would correlate fairly well with Titan's results.
 
They are looking for the Test with the ester.
Test no ester would appear different than test E
 
They can determine ion count for a particular molecule, and get a percentage of the total ion count.

If you can ID the ion count in the equation, you win...

Concentration = 150/4 x 9810/22400 x 12.3 mg/ml = 202 mg/ml
 
22400 is the std ion count, the rest of the equation is beyond me. Masslynx software spits out the rest.
 
So basically ls and burr are contradicting themselves here, right? I can't even figure that out...

I always figured it like this- if I have 100 grams 100% pure cocaine and sniff 40 grams during a gangbang with three strippers with majestic fake breasts, then I cut it (technically add) with 40 grams manitol I then have 100 grams of product at 60% purity. If for some unknown reason some dipshit wants me to suspend it in oil I would do so using all those acronyms (ba, bb, eo whatever). Then the dickhead finds out about my coke fueled gangbang and mass specs this jar of love juice. I labeled this jar at 150 grams.

The mass spec machine negates the oil and b's and e's. It tells senor douchebag there is 100 grams of powder at 60% purity. This would tell him I fucked him on how much powder I put in the oil (fucked him by 50grams... wouldn't be rhe first time) AND I cut that powder heavy by 40% so ther was only 60grams of actual cocaine. Thats why the double math makes sense to me.

202 mg/ml is the amount of powder, he shorted how much total shit (cut and all) he put in the oil first off. Then that powder turned out to be 68% pure so there was only 138 mg/ml test e after you sift through the bullshit. Not sure if those are exact numbers but I'm not going through thread again and you catch my drift
 
From what i have read it looks like the 138 mg is spot on and we have bloodwork that seems to correlate. Looks like enough info. for me to put the guy on the craptastic list.
 
I've read that Test E is 72% testosterone and 28% ester. So in 100mg of Test E is there actually only 72mg test, but we still call it 100mg or is there 100mg of test and ~38mg ester? If it's the previous case, this would correlate fairly well with Titan's results.
That's the weight..
Yes, 100mg of Test E is about 72mg of Testosterone
Propionate is about 83mg Testosterone, but that's not the purity..

The only 100mg that is 100mg is TNE or Test Suspension .. The purity is another thing
 
Question:
on top of juicing, training, macros, work, family, entertainment, sleep etc. etc. Where do you guys find the time to dig up all this extra knowledge??
my hats off to those of you who do it but im stumped as to how you do it?:confused::confused:
 
No the 85% refers to the purity of the powder (fillers)...."100mg is sufficient" refers to the each ml having 100mg of hormone in it...Although the hormone is only 85% pure
If the powder is only half pure (53% in this case) and you double the raw powder then your mg should be correct but it will still test 53% pure cause the dissolved powder isn't 100% pure

This confusion has been going on since page 5 of this thread, lol
 
Back
Top