MAST P OR MAST E

[T&H]

Yes it's the same drug but the ester makes the body respond differently to it. On tren ace to tren e the body takes on 2 different looks. And for those that say they look just the same on e than on ace at end of cycle is bullshit. Body even shows different side effects on e than ace. Timing is compounds can show different gains and makes the body react differently to it.No serious competition body builder uses mast e anymore they use prop.

We're talking about Mast, not Tren. I dont run tren, but I'm curious if people who ran Tren A and E can vouch for your claim.

 

[Turbo charged]

We're talking about Mast, not Tren. I dont run tren, but I'm curious if people who ran Tren A and E can vouch for your claim.

Does not matter we are talking esters

 

[GFitKing2]

Guys, to piggyback this topic, how long after beginning use should one expect each ester to begin exerting its effects? Obviously, prop will reach its saturation and (presumably) begin exerting its effects faster that enanthate will. But can anyone say how much faster?

With prop usually I see results like 2 weeks

I just started Mast E so we shall see

I am running 500-750 Mast E weekly Vs 400 Mast P Weekly since the dosages are easier to get in

 

[GFitKing2]

But 2.5 weeks into it and already hard and veiny as fuck, even being a fatass like I am. And this is not because of the test lol

How did you like the Mast E?

 

[GFitKing2]

Totally wrong they provide much different effects just like tren e and tren ace. Mast e is not even used in bodybuilding circles anymore. Mast p You only need to run it 6 weeks after that gains stop. Switch to another compound keep body changing long cycles of same compound is waste.

I am using it for BB purposes so I will let you know how it works for me - I am already under 7% BF so I should see it working pretty quick when it does. I just have some weird site areas and pinning EOD for 10+ weeks is rough - So I plan on switching to P at 4 weeks out - but for the next 8 weeks run Mast E to save me pinning so much

 

[Gbro]

We're talking about Mast, not Tren. I dont run tren, but I'm curious if people who ran Tren A and E can vouch for your claim.

The only difference I've seen between a and e, is the amount of time it takes to kick in.

 

[T&H]

The only difference I've seen between a and e, is the amount of time it takes to kick in.

That's exactly what I believe, but other guy says no.

 

[kosp]

How did you like the Mast E?

I can't tell much because it was only 2.5 weeks into it but yesterday I was doing some pull-ups in my house and had the harder look I've ever felt. Veins were thicker and body had an unusual athletic appearance.

 

[Gbro]

That's exactly what I believe, but other guy says no.

I try not to make decisions based solely on feelz reports and broscience. It would be nice to see an actual study.

 

[bob357sig]

I try not to make decisions based solely on feelz reports and broscience. It would be nice to see an actual study.

Lol, a study on Tren E

 

[Gbro]

Lol, a study on Tren E

You saying it wouldn't be nice to see?

 

[bob357sig]

You saying it wouldn't be nice to see?

No, I’m not saying that: what I am saying is all that we have is “bro science’ and “feels reports”, on a lot of compounds. Boldenone. Superdrol, very little human studies on tren, mast, winstrol, exc. I don’t like when actual use reports, from experienced users is written off as “bro science” . I also can give a fuck about any rat studies!

 

[zepp]

I have used both extensively.

I brew mast-p in mig840 at 200mg/ml, it's got some real pip. The result does kick in faster and stronger with prop, however the longer term effects are the same. Prop can come on so quick at higher doses that it can dry your joints out and lead to joint pain. The other thing is you can get it out of your system quicker should you get BPH.

Mast-e at 200mg/ml in mct, zero pip. Doesn't have quite as much effect, but long term it gets the job done. I would tend to agree that prop is stronger for a reason i have no idea.

I remain on Mast E because I feel fantastic on it, zero pip, don't have the joint drying that I was getting with prop.

 

[TANGO.ECHO.KILO]

Only difference is ester weight, that being said dosing should be adjusted accordingly 400mg mast E does is not equivalent to 400 mast P. Ran plenty of test p/ tren a / mast p cutting cycles in a deficit. Currently running low test E with high dose primo, eq, mast e, and gh in a small surplus...due to the primo and eq its simply a better fit to run mast e and pin 2x week all in the same barrel.

 

[GFitKing2]

I have used both extensively.

I brew mast-p in mig840 at 200mg/ml, it's got some real pip. The result does kick in faster and stronger with prop, however the longer term effects are the same. Prop can come on so quick at higher doses that it can dry your joints out and lead to joint pain. The other thing is you can get it out of your system quicker should you get BPH.

Mast-e at 200mg/ml in mct, zero pip. Doesn't have quite as much effect, but long term it gets the job done. I would tend to agree that prop is stronger for a reason i have no idea.

I remain on Mast E because I feel fantastic on it, zero pip, don't have the joint drying that I was getting with prop.

This is exactly what I am thinking. The pip in Mast P was pretty rough along with EOD injection - just looking to see the longer term effects maybe 6-8 weeksin

 

[GFitKing2]

Only difference is ester weight, that being said dosing should be adjusted accordingly 400mg mast E does is not equivalent to 400 mast P. Ran plenty of test p/ tren a / mast p cutting cycles in a deficit. Currently running low test E with high dose primo, eq, mast e, and gh in a small surplus...due to the primo and eq its simply a better fit to run mast e and pin 2x week all in the same barrel.

What or how would you adjust the Mast E to get Mast P similar dosage ? How do you feel about 500 Mast E Weekly?

 

[Deleted member 59947]

Behind OP's questions there is also another interrogation: the veracity of the compound.
Has it been debunked that Mast E is more often faked than Mast P?

 

[Pcs1215]

The difference is the half life. Dont listen to this "bro science". Saying no BB uses Mast E? Lmao.

Yes it's the same drug but the ester makes the body respond differently to it. On tren ace to tren e the body takes on 2 different looks. And for those that say they look just the same on e than on ace at end of cycle is bullshit. Body even shows different side effects on e than ace. Timing is compounds can show different gains and makes the body react differently to it.No serious competition body builder uses mast e anymore they use prop.

 

[Trenbologna]

I have used both extensively.

I brew mast-p in mig840 at 200mg/ml, it's got some real pip. The result does kick in faster and stronger with prop, however the longer term effects are the same. Prop can come on so quick at higher doses that it can dry your joints out and lead to joint pain. The other thing is you can get it out of your system quicker should you get BPH.

Mast-e at 200mg/ml in mct, zero pip. Doesn't have quite as much effect, but long term it gets the job done. I would tend to agree that prop is stronger for a reason i have no idea.

I remain on Mast E because I feel fantastic on it, zero pip, don't have the joint drying that I was getting with prop.

Mind if I ask the dosage you run that makes you feel fantastic?

 

[MisterSuperGod]

Mind if I ask the dosage you run that makes you feel fantastic?

i think that's user dependent. i've ran it up to 600 mg/wk and didn't feel shit, with the exception of two or three random episodes of sudden anxiety.

i doubt bumping it up another 200 mg/wk would have given me the good feelz that some people get. i'm just not lucky in that regard.