So...It seem that i have gotten my hands on a pretty good batch of tren a.
I started thinking about how to maximize it to its full potential to achieve the most gains.
This led to researching different studies of the use of tren a in beef cattle to stimulate their growth.
What i found was a compilation of all the pertinent studies on cattle growth with the final results above baseline given in percentages. 28 pages worth.
Over a typical period of growth in cattle...specifically steers and bulls i found the following.....I'm just using arbitrary weight numbers but the % of gain diff is from the study's.
baseline group of steers..no tren
at completion of study................200lbs
Steers with tren a........................ 224lbs
Steers with tren a and an estroidal implant that effectively RAISED the
estrogen in the male...................251lbs
Thats a 12% weight increase with
tren a over feed only.
But by ADDING in estrogen along with tren a there was a whopping 25.5% increase in muscle mass over feed only.
Now i started thinking about this in our own case for bodybuilding.
I use little to no ai on test doses 600mg and under. Usually i have treated high e2 issues when symptoms pointed that it was climbing.
Mostly emotional indicators.
If adding estrogen doubled the results of tren a use in cattle...would it not follow that allowing ones own estrogen to rise as high as possible say in the 70 to 90 range( provided it caused no unwanted sides) during a tren a...test..cycle in order to maximize gains.
In my case i have had e2 numbers in the 60s without incident other than some fluid retention.
Off cycle it hangs around 29ish.
Maybe by knocking down e2 numbers we have limited the real potential that tren a can provide?
Opinions?
The study results were compiled from a number of studies conducted from 1983 thru 1988 by Peter T Anderson
Title of it is...A review of studies of trenbolone acetate use in beef cattle...
I started thinking about how to maximize it to its full potential to achieve the most gains.
This led to researching different studies of the use of tren a in beef cattle to stimulate their growth.
What i found was a compilation of all the pertinent studies on cattle growth with the final results above baseline given in percentages. 28 pages worth.
Over a typical period of growth in cattle...specifically steers and bulls i found the following.....I'm just using arbitrary weight numbers but the % of gain diff is from the study's.
baseline group of steers..no tren
at completion of study................200lbs
Steers with tren a........................ 224lbs
Steers with tren a and an estroidal implant that effectively RAISED the
estrogen in the male...................251lbs
Thats a 12% weight increase with
tren a over feed only.
But by ADDING in estrogen along with tren a there was a whopping 25.5% increase in muscle mass over feed only.
Now i started thinking about this in our own case for bodybuilding.
I use little to no ai on test doses 600mg and under. Usually i have treated high e2 issues when symptoms pointed that it was climbing.
Mostly emotional indicators.
If adding estrogen doubled the results of tren a use in cattle...would it not follow that allowing ones own estrogen to rise as high as possible say in the 70 to 90 range( provided it caused no unwanted sides) during a tren a...test..cycle in order to maximize gains.
In my case i have had e2 numbers in the 60s without incident other than some fluid retention.
Off cycle it hangs around 29ish.
Maybe by knocking down e2 numbers we have limited the real potential that tren a can provide?
Opinions?
The study results were compiled from a number of studies conducted from 1983 thru 1988 by Peter T Anderson
Title of it is...A review of studies of trenbolone acetate use in beef cattle...
