Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why would he do different tests?Do we know whether Jano used the same set up for both tests (TRA and TRE 400)? If not, that could explain some of the differences.
Not different tests, a different set up of his equipment. Otherwise what explains tren degradation products showing up in this new test but not the one where it was specifically degraded?.why would he do different tests?
Again i have to ask " Why would he do this" ? is there something im missing here? SeriousNot different tests, different set ups of his equipment.
Maybe he didn’t want you to think you guys were wasting your money. If it just kept coming back blank it makes sense he would adjust things.Again i have to ask " Why would he do this" ? is there something im missing here? Serious
i'm not entirely sure how to read gcms reports either, This whole experiment was a little over my head , lol , jk , but at least theres some effort being made, and it did provide some useful data, again a little outta my pay grade so ,Have a Grateful DayMaybe he didn’t want you to think you guys were wasting your money. If it just kept coming back blank it makes sense he would adjust things.
@janoshikFor reference, if you see Kain's TRA, looks really clean.
View attachment 349572
Why does the TRE look like this?
Raws tested 96%+ by vendor.
View attachment 349574
View attachment 349573
Also this..1,4-Naphthoquinone, 6-acetyl-2,5,8-trihydroxy-, in the clear yellow vial, not the other. Is this used as a dye?
You might be getting confused. Two different tren projects are In This thread. The first tren project was regarding the color variance and degradation of raw materials via heat exposure. This second project is ultimately concerned with plastics leeching into finished projects from processing /filtering. Im pretty sure all material is undergoing the same testing but additionally testing for plastics in second test run? I have a hard time following what is happening in here sometimes too.Not different tests, a different set up of his equipment. Otherwise what explains tren degradation products showing up in this new test but not the one where it was specifically degraded?.
You might be getting confused. Two different projects tren projects are I. This thread. The first tren project was regarding the color variance and degradation of raw materials. This second project is ultimately concerned with plastics leeching into finished projects from processing /filtering. Im pretty sure all material is undergoing the same testing but additionally testing for plastics? I have a hard time following what is happening in here sometimes too.
The screening method is the same though. The question is has peak 3 been seen on any other GCMS reports or was there some change to GC injection method or column conditions. My take is nothing special was done to pick up the peak at 15.442 min. I asked Jano.Yes
Two projects.
The latter is not Tren related, its just that i bought TRE400 so i sent it for testing. Additional screening for plastic, yes.
All the peaks add up to the roughly 4% other. Two different raws? In the raw?Also this..1,4-Naphthoquinone, 6-acetyl-2,5,8-trihydroxy-, in the clear yellow vial, not the other. Is this used as a dye?
higher dose, different degradation factors. different vial life, different oils & raw product. different brewing.Not different tests, a different set up of his equipment. Otherwise what explains tren degradation products showing up in this new test but not the one where it was specifically degraded?.
I'm sure you've shared it already, but how much was one of these tests?Results of 2 vials sent out for polystyrene detection.
TRE400
Red colored TRE
Yellow colored TRE
Due to personal reasons, I will be significantly reducing my vendor bought gear and will not be running the project. If anyone wants to continue with the project, please feel free.
See the GCMS model thread. Compendium of all the GCMS tests we have.I'm sure you've shared it already, but how much was one of these tests?
I wonder what one would look like with some standard test cyp 250?
I wonder what one would look like with some standard test cyp 250?
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteranPenche my man,finally open up to meso!
Lmao anabolic associated love itanabolic associate? PED partner?
Sorry I meant would we see apparent leeched plastic in a lower concentration vial. Or am I totally missing the point here and it's more leeched plastic?Always BA BB Oil.
Ideally nothing else.
My dude i remember your handle and pit, OG veteranPenche my man,finally open up to meso!
Lmao anabolic associated love itanabolic associate? PED partner?
Remember You as well my man. Appreciate the Old Timers following along.
I have reports to share. @newguy2 you know I got you on the ping.
The hplc report does match the numbers i crunch off the top of my head. Thank you to the Jano team for producing fast results.
Sorry I meant would we see apparent leeched plastic in a lower concentration vial. Or am I totally missing the point here and it's more leeched plastic?
maybe it truly has nothing to do with color, but those findings explain some of the tren issues
I think I follow what you’re asking….certain “solvents” are more responsible for disintegrating the plastic than others. So the higher the concentration of the corrosive solvent, within the finished oil, the more likely plastics will be found in the sample. Theoretically some products will be more affected than others.Sorry I meant would we see apparent leeched plastic in a lower concentration vial. Or am I totally missing the point here and it's more leeched plastic?
I’m not sure if I’m following where we are heading either, or if there is a clear hypothesis. My best guess is correlating the presence of plastics with color of the sample and the level of toxicity it contains?What tren issues, specifically?
