Ms/hplc Data - Felicity - Fluoxymesterone (halotestin)

insertnamehere

New Member
I received this MS/HPLC test data from member Felicity at Evo as an example of what to expect if I were to pay him for his testing service. According to Felicity, the sample was Fluoxymesterone (Halotestin).

As a part of my due diligence, I privately sought the opinion of Dr. Jim based on his educational background and professional experience.

Dr. Jim had many concerns and questions regarding the legitimacy of this data. To generalize and paraphrase one of his statements…the data is either faked or the testing was performed by someone who doesn’t know what they’re doing.

Upon receiving Dr. Jims assessment, I invited Felicity to have an open discussion so that he may defend his work, addressing Dr. Jims questions and concerns.

After many emails over the past few days trying to convince him and despite accommodating all of his conditions to discuss the data, except the one to have it be a “back room discussion”, he has continued to decline the offer.

Based on Dr. Jims assessment and the long string of emails full of excuses, I believe the testing service offered by Felicity is bogus.

This thread is posted for the purpose of public scrutiny and debate, so others can learn and be aware to stay away from Felicitys testing service.

Felicity has been notified of this thread with and open invitation to address the concerns.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-10-11 at 3.57.10 AM.jpg
    Screen Shot 2014-10-11 at 3.57.10 AM.jpg
    41.9 KB · Views: 25
  • h8fc9530.jpg
    h8fc9530.jpg
    83.8 KB · Views: 22
  • h4c24fca.jpg
    h4c24fca.jpg
    47.2 KB · Views: 22
  • h5746a6e.jpg
    h5746a6e.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 20
  • hdfbfd6c.jpg
    hdfbfd6c.jpg
    13.6 KB · Views: 19
I am sure that there is market to sell / buy fake lab results and opportunity to make money.

You have to know that no reputable lab will accept steroid or drag testing from people walking in from the street.

I have seen a lot of this, sources posting fake lab results on their web pages to make their gear look good.
 
I am sure that there is market to sell / buy fake lab results and opportunity to make money.

You have to know that no reputable lab will accept steroid or drag testing from people walking in from the street.

I have seen a lot of this, sources posting fake lab results on their web pages to make their gear look good.

There's great interest in legit testing and with that comes people looking to take advantage.

Are you saying this data looks faked to you?
 
I am not expert, I have seen some reports. Looks to me like a bunch of nonsense. I really do not know what to make of this.

I see on some chromatographs a few peeks it means that you have a lot of components inside but the purity says 92 % which does not make sense.

On other chromatographs I see just one peek, like you have put together a few reporst and try to make it to look like one.
 
I am not expert, I have seen some reports. Looks to me like a bunch of nonsense. I really do not know what to make of this.

I see on some chromatographs a few peeks it means that you have a lot of components inside but the purity says 92 % which does not make sense.

On other chromatographs I see just one peek, like you have put together a few reporst and try to make it to look like one.

That seems to be the consensus - its a bunch of non sense.

Hopefully Dr. Jim will have chance to post his thoughts on this openly soon.
 
take a look at other chromatograph, you have only one peek, like it was 100%, which is impossible and contradicts the statement that it is 92%

It is just a mess or scam. I do not know what to think about this.

All those lab results GC/MS, HPLC I have seen here or on eroids are just not reliable like somebody is using photoshop to make them.
 
The results look identical to the ones Angus used to get. I don't think Angus is using the TOF method anymore. I would be skeptical that this is just an old test from Angus.
 
The results look identical to the ones Angus used to get. I don't think Angus is using the TOF method anymore. I would be skeptical that this is just an old test from Angus.

That's exactly what it looks like. Angus used a Waters Q-Tof Premier mass spectrometer - identical to the one used this mass spec. I would be skeptical of ANYTHING coming from EVO.
 
Back
Top