"Although smell,hearing or touching is a situation where the fourth admendment defense is not applicable; If no permission was given to search and they searched anyway then the police violated the 4th admendment which means it will poision or "taint" evidence obtained later in the same investigation. WONG VS UNITED STATES"
While this is case law, it has been mis-understood.
No situation in law enforcement is black and white, right or wrong. It is a realm of gray areas. Im not familier with the "wong" case as i've never heard it called as a defense to dismiss a case. I cant tell ya the number of parties of been called to where i could smell weed, so i started asking who's house it was after i knocked. (in party situtations everybody always turns dumb, "gee i dont know who's house this is") But to make a long story short they've tried to say i had no PC to enter the residence based on me smelling weed that could have come from anywhere, however, using the reasonable person standard my charges have been upheld each time (and convicted)
My advice to you bro's is DO NOT GO TO THE FUCKING DEA OR OTHER GOVERNMENT WEBSITE AND START TRYING TO INGRAIN STATUTES AND LAWS THAT YOU WILL NOT BE TRIED UNDER IF YOUR BUSTED!!!
Learn your own states laws as thats what you'll be charged under if your cuaght with any substance unless its in un-friggin-real amounts. (then the feds may grab it or the locals may turn it over.)
Meso-Member, im not pickin on your post at all. You had just given out some advice that may have caused some bros more harm than good in the future.
(i.e; slam the door and flush the evidence) Woo-hoo now you've got a RDO (resist,Delay,Obstruct) charge)
Im just trying to give a little insight into how the laws apply based on real world experience as a Officer, so you guys can better arm yourselves.
~~BFA~~