janoshik
Subscriber
While fully agreeing with post #38 I gotta say I've been hearing a lot about the results provided by your company.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't mean to stir up any bad blood. I didn't know about the history between AL and ChemClarity.
@ChemClarity.com I don't think you understand the role AL has in the buying decisions of customers because you need to understand the whole puzzle of how buyers make an informed decision in the online market. AL is seen as one very important peice of the puzzle which is backed up by science. You also need to understand that before AL, buyers were soley relying on anonymous testimony and bloodwork that had no proof of product and dosage used. Also, you are offering a service for buyers post-purchase. How is ChemClarity helping buyers make informed decisions? Is all private customer results being released publicly to help the community make more informed buying decisions? AL is an amazing tool to the online community and until more data is released to the public about the most popular illicit brands, it is the best one we have for harm reduction and for making informed buying decisions.
P.S. You should be thanking AL and @Millard Baker for changing the online community by making buyers aware of lab testing and more users demanding testing of UGLs. You probably wouldn't have much of a market worldwide without Millard's work.
We just don't think this type of 'pre-purchase' testing is an effective tool and that's an opinion shared by many people. A database of historic test data isn't as all that useful and it doesn't help a user select a reliable UGL. The industry is too inconsistent for this to work - which we can demonstrate.
For example - If a UGL tests 'well' and that information is released, it creates a perception of quality that will influence a user's decision making. Months later that same UGL could test poorly. So the data provided on the UGL isn't helpful.
^^ Last month we tested c.130 samples from submitted by British Public and we've already seen examples of this happening.
It's something we're working on with our authorities. We understand the law but the process isn't clear.