Opti Injectables

[Opti]

Both Janoshik and Analiza received raw materials from the same package for testing, there were no irregularities on our part.

Although the majority of the raw materials tested within minimal variance between the two testing facilities, there were a few with significant differences. Please see below.

After careful consideration, the injectables were produced in accordance to Janoshik's results.



DECA





EQ





MASTERON E





MASTERON P





NPP





PRIMO E





SUS




TEST C





TEST E





TEST P




TREN A





TREN E

 

[Opti]

 

[Vajfan]

Any reasonable explanation why purity tests could differ so vastly on EQ

 

[clearheaded]

also very strange the sample name included exact %... hmmmmm mmm

is fuckery afoot?

 

[janoshik]

also very strange the sample name included exact %... hmmmmm mmm

is fuckery afoot?

Got us!

 

[clearheaded]

Got us!


View attachment 290518

bit strange tho no? why would they put results in the sample name??

1. poor lab practice
2. fuckery

both aren't great for a lab to be fair jano and u know that.

 

[janoshik]

bit strange tho no? why would they put results in the sample name??

1. poor lab practice
2. fuckery

both aren't great for a lab to be fair jano and u know that.

And surely there are no other options whatsoever indeed.

 

[clearheaded]

And surely there are no other options whatsoever indeed.

what are these other options? came labeled 98%?

this isn't a gotcha and was more of a joke but that crappy none copper grounded hat is a disgrace to keyboard worriers. we are waiting with baited breath why results landed in sample name! a second verification test wouldn't be a good answer either as published/finished result.

 

[janoshik]

Opti asked my team to add dosage of one of his products into product name and my team made a mistake and put 98% into the name of this one, then forgot about it