MESO-Rx Sponsor Opti USA DOMESTIC - HGH, INJECTABLES, TABLETS, PEPTIDES, & MISC

Right on. I only run mast once a year and it’s for a cut. Nothing really acts like mast does. I’m most upset about this than the primo.

I ran a lot of primo the past year but I’m going on EQ and DHB until prices/supply calm down.
That's smart. And the biochemistry of supports it.

EQ, primo, and DHB are all boldenone derivatives. Here is the missing branch of the steroid family tree:

Testosterone + C1-2 double bond > Boldenone (Parenabol)
Boldenone w/ C17 undecylenate ester > EQ (Equipoise)
Boldenone w/ C17 methylation > metendienone (Dianabol)
Boldenone + synthetic 5⍺-reduction w/ cypionate ester > DHB
DHB + c1-methylation w/ enanthate ester > primobolan (Nibal)
DHB + c2-methylation w/ acetate ester > stenbolone (Anatrofin)

Note: Dbol because it has no ester and converts to a highly potent synthetic estrogen (7⍺-methylestradiol) has a different effect than the others.

Primo is by far the weakest of the entire group. If primo provides E2 control, so should EQ as that feature comes from the C1-2 double bond; in some people based on their genetics, androgen ligands with it can jam up the aromatase binding site and act as a competitive inhibitor. C1 methylation of primobolan was designed for oral bioavailability of primbolan acetate (same with DHT, where the C1 methylation gives Proviron). Subsequently primobolan depot was created as a oil-soluble injectable by adding a C17-enanthate ester. The C1-methylation may coincidentally offer partial resistance to 3⍺-HSD in skeletal muscle, but primobolan's main metabolites are 3⍺-hydroxylated, so not that much - it is not particularly anabolic, certainly less so than testosterone and all the others listed above, and probably little more than Proviron. Basically it's a very expensive AI - and inferior in that regard to aromasin, another synthetic androgen that permanently disable aromatase in essentially everyone, making ratios with aromatizing androgens mostly irrelevant. The only real problem with aromasin is the available dosing - it should be offered for men in 3.125mg or 6.25mg tabs, not 25mg which is the post-menopausal female breast cancer dose designed to eliminate estrogen production, although in practice that is less likely to happen in men. I've been buying Exesin (Indian pharma) and breaking it up into quarters, not easy as they are very tiny tablets. Solutions are a better option, but not available as pharma and dosing of UGL/research AIs is inherently suspect.

If you want to use an injectable for estrogen control, EQ is much cheaper/available, more anabolic and should be at least as effective as primobolan. And the hematocrit raising effects of EQ and primobolan are quite similar, although EQ primarily has the bad rep for it probably because it is typically dosed quite high. Primobolan also has significant PIP potential, EQ does not and injection volumes are much lower with EQ which typically comes in 2-3x the concentration with < 25% the price per ml.

Methylation and other alterations at C2, rather than C1, are specifically designed to resist degradation by 3⍺-HSD, so increase anabolism in muscle. Drostanolone/Masteron (DHT based) and stenbolone/Anatrofin (DHB based) are in this category; so are ALL the other so-called "DHT derivatives" with high anabolic:androgenic ratios (except primobolan) - ie oxandrolone, oxymetholone, and stanzolol which has a unique C2-3 ring modification. C-C2-C3 is target on the A-ring to manipulate the parent hormone's resistance to 3⍺-HSD.
 
Testosterone + C1-2 double bond > Boldenone (Parenabol)
Boldenone w/ C17 undecylenate ester > EQ (Equipoise)
Boldenone w/ C17 methylation > metendienone (Dianabol)
Boldenone + synthetic 5⍺-reduction w/ cypionate ester > DHB
DHB + c1-methylation w/ enanthate ester > primobolan (Nibal)
DHB + c2-methylation w/ acetate ester > stenbolone (Anatrofin)
where does boldenone cypionate fall under?
 
HmmIt’s exactly the same compound as boldenone undecylenate, that being boldenone. Cypionate is simply a shorter acting ester in comparison
It’s just different esters. Just like test c and test p.

EQ is the brand name for boldenone undecylenate.

Boldenone cypionate can be thought of as EQ with a slightly faster ester.
Exactly
Medium-long ringed ester versus very long straight ester

I didn’t include it as it’s hard to find, but other than active/half time related to ester it’s identical.

Dbol on the other hand is boldenone with C17 methyl group rather than ester. So it has immediate action and a very potent aromatization product, like boldenone. Which does beg the question, if boldenone is such a potent Ai, why is dbol so notoriously estrogenic?
 
^^^^ That part ^^^^
I know a chemistry professor could explain why but it’s counterintuitive!

Too much EQ crashes e levels. Too much dbol makes you watch hallmark movies.
Yes I agree it’s about the dose
600mg EQ is typical. Dbol might be the one thing I haven’t used but doses are comparably low… so less molecules acting as Ai and much more potent aromatization product = Hallmark movies lol
 
Can anyone provide info on gold tops? If reconstituted in same vial can it hold the volume? Or does it need to be moved to a larger jar
 
Can anyone provide info on gold tops? If reconstituted in same vial can it hold the volume? Or does it need to be moved to a larger jar
When I was doing higher dose gh for a while, I was only using 2ml to reconstitute, and I didn't have any issues through quite a few vials. I'm using 3ml now that I'm on a lower dose, which seems to be the standard recommendation for 40iu vials
 
gotta say guys i am very happy with opti. First time using this source and I will continue using him. Using the gold tops at 10iu a day and man this shit is good. Full as a house, round, bursting at the skin. The anadrol is pure, zero heart burn or any sides at 50mg a day. The injectables are smooth and crystal clear, I will say there is a slight PIP and swelling but very minor. Im on 750 test, 300 npp, 10iu golds and I look freaking massive right now and its only been two weeks. Highly recommend.
 
I don't know how anyone would pay that kind of money for primo. I'm not saying it's a bad compound but there are other alternatives. Primo is great for it's lower level of toxicity but it's also very hypt and over rated in my opinion but people always want what is scarce. It's not a smart buy at the price it is today
I completely agree, although i do like the compound, its just not worth today’s prices.
 
Crap, It was the fake one I was looking at. I have ordered a ton from opti through the years and for some reason the fake .us site popped up when I pulled it up instead of the legit site. Holy shit im glad I saw this post today. I was just about to order 30 of the 190 blues. That would have been bad. Thanks for bringing this up. I pulled the fake one up a week ago and it's just been an open tab on my browser.
How did you know it was a fake opti?
 
When I was doing higher dose gh for a while, I was only using 2ml to reconstitute, and I didn't have any issues through quite a few vials. I'm using 3ml now that I'm on a lower dose, which seems to be the standard recommendation for 40iu vials
I used 1ml to reconstitute and clear as day and perfect
 
Back
Top