Pfizer Genotropine Orginal or Fake

[EmberWave]

Hello everyone,

I frequently see discussions on the forum about whether Pfizer Genotropin is fake or not. Having used it for years, I wanted to share my own methods for distinguishing between the real and fake products in this post.

1- The packaging on the pen:
The original product's packaging is filled with air and made from a really high-quality plastic-nylon mix. I don't know if you've ever made Lego sets before, but the packaging is very similar—extremely high-quality. In the original product, the packaging is filled with air, and the edges have a perfect triangular cut.

If the product is fake, the packaging is very poor in quality, with uneven cuts at the edges and no air inside.

2- The product's leaflet:
The leaflet in the original product is made from slightly thick, high-quality paper. In the fake product, the paper is very thin and poorly folded.

3- The expiration date on the box:
This is generally where I can most easily tell the difference between the original and the fake. I don't know why, but in the original product, the expiration dates are printed lightly, while on the fake boxes, they are printed very clearly and in bold.

4- The cartridge of the product:
When you open the pen and check the cartridge, if the powder inside is mountainous in shape, the product is original. In fake products, the powder remains clumped together, similar to standard peptides.

These are the things that come to mind for now. If you purchase and share pictures, I’d be happy to help you determine whether it’s fake or not. I hope no one encounters a fake product. Wishing everyone a great weekend!

 

[heikokallbachtherealone]

Thanks for sharing

 

[Jay2024]

One must not forget that the counterfeiters are getting better and better.

 

[DugPrime]

You're overthinking it, just send a mail to janoshik, and test your products like everyone else.

 

[MyNameIsJeff]

You're overthinking it, just send a mail to janoshik, and test your products like everyone else.

And then you get a result like 96% purity, which could be either generic GH from a counterfeit pen, or somewhat degraded pharma GH from an improperly stored real pen.

 

[AlexDavis43]

You're overthinking it, just send a mail to janoshik, and test your products like everyone else.

And then you get a result like 96% purity, which could be either generic GH from a counterfeit pen, or somewhat degraded pharma GH from an improperly stored real pen.

Should still get the job done, so...?

 

[readalot]

And then you get a result like 96% purity, which could be either generic GH from a counterfeit pen, or somewhat degraded pharma GH from an improperly stored real pen.

What would would be your acceptable floor for purity and total oligomers?

I am very curious practically speaking who comes out ahead say zomacton vs one of the highly tested UGLs. If we could check off sterility and pyrogen content on the UGL, is the extra cost worth it for the pharma?

Clearly there is plenty of room price wise on the UGL products if needed to clean up should enhanced testing show issues.