Pharmacom and basicstero

If I had doubts about my stuff I would have it tested. Frank and Darius are more than willing to front the bill. I would get the facts and not base shit off my results, much like RT did.

For all I know you could be eating McDonald everyday and your training is shit.
Training and shit is fine. But results is what taking aas is all about. Why take anything if u don't care for good results? Ya know what I mean..
 
I got my batch before this test I believe, through Darius. Darius made it good by replacing with Winny. Even after I told him it was cool. But my story is old and already public record.

I remember there was a big debate going around on how their dbol was garbage. I'm pretty sure it even failed a labmax or 2. A lot of people were shocked when RT posted his results.
 
If this many ppl are willing to defend pharmacom gear then I'm willing to believe I just got unlucky and received a bad batch or whatever may have happens to it. Idk.
 
If this many ppl are willing to defend pharmacom gear then I'm willing to believe I just got unlucky and received a bad batch or whatever may have happens to it. Idk.


Maybe that's a good thought process to keep. I'm sure "shit happens", but in my short time here, and reading a bunch of posts, ive never seen Daruis tell someone to go get fucked. Instead he's offer to test and replace things that weren't right. Honestly I'd handle it all in private instead of screaming like a spoiled child, but thats just me. Its your gig.
 
Maybe that's a good thought process to keep. I'm sure "shit happens", but in my short time here, and reading a bunch of posts, ive never seen Daruis tell someone to go get fucked. Instead he's offer to test and replace things that weren't right. Honestly I'd handle it all in private instead of screaming like a spoiled child, but thats just me. Its your gig.

I'm glad you're catching on. There's a lot of behind the scenes stuff that goes on out of respect, research and fact finding. If something needs to be put on blast it's always because the homework has been done and the person or lab deserves it.
 
Oh, and what bad batch are you referring to by the way? Which product and batch number from this ugl was bunk for you personally?
The anaboliclabs results themselves are inconsistent.

I have no bone to pick with pharmacom and possibly it's just a case of me holding them to a higher standard due to the size of the outfit.
 
The anaboliclabs results themselves are inconsistent.

I have no bone to pick with pharmacom and possibly it's just a case of me holding them to a higher standard due to the size of the outfit.

I'm not trying to start shit but can you clarify what you mean by anaboliclab results being inconsistent? I check the results occasionally and recently seen the gp tren ace tested above 90 two separate times.
 
I'm not trying to start shit but can you clarify what you mean by anaboliclab results being inconsistent? I check the results occasionally and recently seen the gp tren ace tested above 90 two separate times.

The only time pharmacom got a "red" result was for the test e that was overdosed. Every other test ran on there stuff fell within the "green" level that is deemed an acceptable variation.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the acceptable "green" level that anabolic lab uses uses is the same used by pharm grade gear.
 
I'm not trying to start shit but can you clarify what you mean by anaboliclab results being inconsistent? I check the results occasionally and recently seen the gp tren ace tested above 90 two separate times.
Look at their recent test E and test P results compared to old. The recent test p was under dosed considerably. thats not even to mention all the reports of complete bunk dbol and yet it tests fine.

A recent blood work with really inflated test levels from his EQ (indicating that it was likely testosterone ), and another showed no inflated RBC on their EQ which I've never seen before. That's not really conclusive but highly suspect, in my my view.

In the basic thread they admitted that they cut corners to save on production cost. It was a candid discussion point, and I appreciate the transparency but I would be lying if I said it still doesn't grind my gears.
 
Last edited:
The only time pharmacom got a "red" result was for the test e that was overdosed. Every other test ran on there stuff fell within the "green" level that is deemed an acceptable variation.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the acceptable "green" level that anabolic lab uses uses is the same used by pharm grade gear.
I don't think FDA would approve an 18% difference off the target dose (their test P).
 
Simple thing to remember: PHARMACOM IS A UGL. Just because pharma is in the name doesnt make it pharma. And dont believe all the videos anyone puts out. If you havent seen it with your own eyes it cant be trusted.
 
Look at their recent test E and test P results compared to old. The recent test p was under dosed considerably. thats not even to mention all the reports of complete bunk dbol and yet it tests fine.

A recent blood work really inflated test levels from his EQ (indicating that it was likely testosterone ), and another showed no inflated RBC on their EQ which I've never seen before. That's not really conclusive but highly suspect, my my view.

In the basic thread they admitted that they cut corners to save on production cost. It was a candid discussion point, and I appreciate the transparency but I would be lying if I said it still doesn't grind my gears.

You mean under dosed like the pharmaceutical grade test that was under dosed by about the same amount?

You mean no inflated rbc from the guy that just donated blood?

I'm no advocate for pharmacom, they do fuck up time and again like with the overdosed test e. But it seems you're activly trying to find shit wrong with their stuff, witch hunt type of shit.
 
Look at their recent test E and test P results compared to old. The recent test p was under dosed considerably. thats not even to mention all the reports of complete bunk dbol and yet it tests fine.

A recent blood work with really inflated test levels from his EQ (indicating that it was likely testosterone ), and another showed no inflated RBC on their EQ which I've never seen before. That's not really conclusive but highly suspect, in my my view.

In the basic thread they admitted that they cut corners to save on production cost. It was a candid discussion point, and I appreciate the transparency but I would be lying if I said it still doesn't grind my gears.

I'll check it out, thanks for your response
 
You mean under dosed like the pharmaceutical grade test that was under dosed by about the same amount?

You mean no inflated rbc from the guy that just donated blood?

I'm no advocate for pharmacom, they do fuck up time and again like with the overdosed test e. But it seems you're activly trying to find shit wrong with their stuff, witch hunt type of shit.
Not sure which pharmaceutical test you are talking about.

I don't see FDA approved testosterone in anaboliclab.

I do tend to be critical of all ugl's . But especially those with the $$$ to do better.
 
FDA doesn't even approve amps

For one I never said it was fda approved. I said pharm grade which it is.

I also said that there is a acceptable variance that even the fda allows and I belive anabolic labs follows the same criteria via their red and green system.

Green = pass
Red = fail

Sort of like the acceptable level of rat shit and bug parts the fda allows in our food.
 
Back
Top