MESO-Rx Sponsor Pharmacom Labs officials and our Basicstero.com store

US Warehouse Restock Announcement!

The Basicstero US Domestic warehouse has been restocked with many highly anticipated items.
Multiple different types of testosterone products, boldenone, Tren-A, Primo, and ampoule products are now in stock!

You can find the announcement about it on the NEWS page of the Basicstero site at the link in the code box below.
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/news/domestic-us-warehouse-has-been-restocked

All stock and current availability can be found at the "Purchase" page on the Basicstero site at the link in the code box below.
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/price
 
More results. All from the same order as my previous results in this thread. Placed from the international warehouse of Basicstero.ws

EQ 300 is sample 1
Deca 300 is sample 2

All products were pulled from the original vial with a separate, previously unopened and unused needle. Each sample was then placed into a separate previously unopened, unused sterile vial. Each sample was clearly labeled. The entire process is on video. Here are stills from that video.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7112.webp
    IMG_7112.webp
    52 KB · Views: 70
  • IMG_7113.webp
    IMG_7113.webp
    49.6 KB · Views: 66
  • IMG_7121.webp
    IMG_7121.webp
    72.8 KB · Views: 63
  • IMG_7122.webp
    IMG_7122.webp
    76.9 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_7127.webp
    IMG_7127.webp
    66.8 KB · Views: 36
  • IMG_7124.webp
    IMG_7124.webp
    82.6 KB · Views: 35
  • IMG_7125.webp
    IMG_7125.webp
    81.8 KB · Views: 34
  • IMG_7126.webp
    IMG_7126.webp
    118.7 KB · Views: 31
  • IMG_7123.webp
    IMG_7123.webp
    91.5 KB · Views: 61
More results. All from the same order as my previous results in this thread. Placed from the international warehouse of Basicstero.ws

EQ 300 is sample 1
Deca 300 is sample 2

All products were pulled from the original vial with a separate, previously unopened and unused needle. Each sample was then placed into a separate previously unopened, unused sterile vial. Each sample was clearly labeled. The entire process is on video. Here are stills from that video.
Nice :) I'm glad they are better results this time.

Boldenone = 268.94 / 300 = .90%
Nandrolone = 291.08 / 300 = 97%

Both are passes this time, within the widely accepted +/- 10% of label claim. This is good to see.

Thanks again for getting testing.
 
International Warehouse vs Domestic Warehouses

No one has any control over government agencies or the postal system, and there are always some risks involved with trying to obtain products that may not be legal in every country. Therefore, please make sure you check the laws and policies where you are located and make informed choices.

The International Warehouse can ship to almost any country around the world. If you place your order from the International Warehouse, you get the best price. Please make sure you understand and accept the associated risk of ordering international including longer transit times and the risk of customs inspection/seizure. Basicstero offers one reship of your order free of charge if a pack is lost by the postal system or a seizure occurs. There is only one reship per order. The main advantages of the international service are the lowest prices and sometimes more stock availability.

The Domestic Warehouses are meant for customers in each region who want to get Pharmacom Labs products as soon as possible and with less risks. Stock from the domestic warehouses ship from within the region for customers located in the specific region the domestic warehouse serves. For example, the US warehouse is located in the US and had no customs clearance risk and the fastest transit time to US location. The main advantages to domestic service are faster transit time and less risks.
 
Last edited:
Nice :) I'm glad they are better results this time.

Boldenone = 268.94 / 300 = .90%
Nandrolone = 291.08 / 300 = 97%

Both are passes this time, within the widely accepted +/- 10% of label claim. This is good to see.

Thanks again for getting testing.
Deca ok but eq disaster. It's much closer to 250 than 300, should change label or price. This is the way how all oils supposed to be checked. There r a lot of other chats where people saying, janushek was compromised.all samples should be without any labels or brand signs. Just this way.
 
Deca ok but eq disaster. It's much closer to 250 than 300, should change label or price. This is the way how all oils supposed to be checked. There r a lot of other chats where people saying, janushek was compromised.all samples should be without any labels or brand signs. Just this way.
People will complain no matter what. When Basicstero sends without labels, people complain. When Basicstero asks people to send with label, people complain.
People want to complain, so let them complain.
People are also free to shop wherever they choose or start their own company if they have all the answers and can do better.

As for the recent results, there are no "disasters" with any of the results -- do the math...

Boldenone = 268.94 / 300 = .90%
Nandrolone = 291.08 / 300 = 97%

Both are passes this time, within the widely accepted +/- 10% of label claim.

And, most importantly, they show that they are the correct compounds.
I consider these good results.

Anyone that thinks these are bad results are either simply ignorant or dramatic (just echo bullshit they see from others ignorant people online).

There haven't been any "disasters" of which I'm aware (see my post quoted below).
By the way, even if these alleged "bad" results are accurate, everyone should ask themselves how "bad" was the situation really was?
Does anything in your life really change? would your results in the gym really be any different? Was anything dangerous or toxic exposed in these results?
The reaction in the results thread (were the source really cannot defend itself) and damage to the business here was disproportional.

Everyone could have explained and explored the possible reasons for the results, or, even if you don't understand that there may have been an error, you could have explained that the results don't show anything significant or dramatic.
But, instead of being reasonable, the first few guys that reacted pounces on a chance to act very negative and dramatic and accuse the source of being bad. So of course, the sheep will follow because of the cognitive bias that was established and the need to fit in with the crowd.
If the first few guys were calm and explained what I will explain, most people would have reacted much differently.

You can see that a lot of guys only read the first post so no matter what happens after that or what details are discussed, the damage is done -- congrats, your reactions (not BigJP or the results) hurt one of the best AAS sources you will ever find.

This is a strange place where most of the people here use AAS, but then they act like the hate AAS sources.

Maybe one day the haters will get their way and all the AAS sources will go under -- what a victory. We will show those nasty sources, that produce the products we all want, what's up.
Then, all us AAS users can celebrate having no access to AAS.

Ahh, time will tell -- especially with the lack of raw materials -- the future is going to be interesting. I have a front row seat to watch how it all unfolds.

I haven't done it until now, because I really didn't want to waste more time debating random names on a website, but let's crunch the actual numbers to see how tragic this historic situation was that traumatized people like it was Pearl Harbor or Covid.

Keep in mind that +/- 10% has been the widely accepted tolerance for many years including the pass/fail threshold for testing projects such as AnabolicLab.
Therefore a 90% to %110 would have been considered a good result.

Trigger warning: don't look at the math or anything else stated below if you're easily offended and dramatic, you've been warned so get ready to clutch your pearls and act traumatized like something really significant in life just happened...

TEST-E300:
258.28 / 300 = 86%

MIX-M:
163.68 / 200 = 82%
82.86 / 100 = 83%

NPP:
89.13 / 100 = 89%

Some of these were very close to being in the acceptable range to have been considered a "pass." Who knows if we sent a few samples from each batch, what would the averages look like?

But as I have already said, even if the results are true, nothing there shows any dangerous risks -- the results don't even claim that the wrong AAS were used.

That is not the same as having the wrong active agent or dangerous contamination. I respect anyone is free to disagree (no one is forced to shop here) but I will still be using these products even if the results were accurate, and I still consider this one of the best sources of which I'm aware. (on a side note, I really don't have other sources right now, so if you're very confident that you know of a much better option than what I have, anyone is free to shoot me a PM and let me know about it -- I have helped a lot of guys here, so its fair if people help me too, and it never hurts for me to have some other options).

So, I feel like people are just excited to pounce on any opportunity to bash this source, and I don't understand why. It’s as if they are excited and want to see Basicstero have a problem -- as if they want there to be a problem here, but I don't understand why?

To be clear, and I've already said it many times before but people seem to want to misunderstand me to make drama, so I'll say it again...
I'm not blaming @BigJP for any of it -- I thanked him.
He was completely calm and kind to me every time I've ever talked to him. He didn't get all offended or dramatic like some guys here.
If more people here were like him, this would be a much better community.
 
People will complain no matter what. When Basicstero sends without labels, people complain. When Basicstero asks people to send with label, people complain.
People want to complain, so let them complain.
People are also free to shop wherever they choose or start their own company if they have all the answers and can do better.

As for the recent results, there are no "disasters" with any of the results -- do the math...

Boldenone = 268.94 / 300 = .90%
Nandrolone = 291.08 / 300 = 97%

Both are passes this time, within the widely accepted +/- 10% of label claim.

And, most importantly, they show that they are the correct compounds.
I consider these good results.

Anyone that thinks these are bad results are either simply ignorant or dramatic (just echo bullshit they see from others ignorant people online).

There haven't been any "disasters" of which I'm aware (see my post quoted below).
Of course not like olimp years ago wrong compounds. Eq is not matching, there is no +/- 10%, will be nice if same batch will be checked by sombody else, because batch by batch coul be slightly different as well. Imho
 
Of course not like olimp years ago wrong compounds. Eq is not matching, there is no +/- 10%, will be nice if same batch will be checked by sombody else, because batch by batch coul be slightly different as well. Imho
The EQ result that was just posted is 90% of label claim (do the math), which is a good result and at the +/- 10% tolerance.
Don't buy it if you don't like it, that will just leave more to me and the guys that want it :)

I agree, it is always good to get more data points.
Maybe this 90% will come back lower from another test.
Or, maybe another test will give higher results.
The results do have some slight variance -- multiple testing of the same exact sample may give slightly different results.
Maybe another test will give 92% or maybe 89%....
But, regardless, there will not be any disasters.
 
Also, notice how some of good results, from the same batch as some of the questionable results, don't get any attention here on MESO ...
I wonder if there's a cognitive bias.

Another customer sent in a sample from the same batch.
Also, there is still an outstanding offer for up to two more customers to send in samples from that same batch.

Source's most recent results:
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/uploads/pdf/pdf-1749152142-u8b1cgy6be_120_200_0.png

Customer results found on Reddit for the MIX-M (drostanolone mix) from the same time (most likely same batch) as the questionable results, are also good... but no one seems to care.

And, think logically, what seems more reasonable...
Maybe the anomalous results were not accurate for some reason?
Or, are all the many years of good results (including from other customers and testing groups etc.) and these most recent customers' results all wrong, so only the one set of outlier results are correct?

Just ask yourself, why some of the guys here think all the other results, including customers' results, new and old, do not count, but magically only the anomalous results count? Do they have a cognitive bias? Does thier position make logical sense?
 
Does anyone from Europe have experience with the International Camp ? Order has arrived in NL and has been forwarded to Germany, now the tracking says "Processing customs" has anyone ever had that?
 
Also, notice how some of good results, from the same batch as some of the questionable results, don't get any attention here on MESO ...
I wonder if there's a cognitive bias.

Another customer sent in a sample from the same batch.
Also, there is still an outstanding offer for up to two more customers to send in samples from that same batch.

Source's most recent results:
Code:
https://basicstero.ws/uploads/pdf/pdf-1749152142-u8b1cgy6be_120_200_0.png

Customer results found on Reddit for the MIX-M (drostanolone mix) from the same time (most likely same batch) as the questionable results, are also good... but no one seems to care.

And, think logically, what seems more reasonable...
Maybe the anomalous results were not accurate for some reason?
Or, are all the many years of good results (including from other customers and testing groups etc.) and these most recent customers' results all wrong, so only the one set of outlier results are correct?

Just ask yourself, why some of the guys here think all the other results, including customers' results, new and old, do not count, but magically only the anomalous results count? Do they have a cognitive bias? Does thier position make logical sense?
Interesting these one was blind or with some logos on the cups etc, u know what I mean. Janushek could be compromised. There are a lot of sources talking about him, his is getting some benefits from some brands for good, acceptable results. Other places talking janushek in these days is 50%/50%. I remember phl in old days was using some swiss company and French, why not anymore?
 
I could already imagine that it was confiscated. Because if it was already in Holland, it should not go to German customs, but be transported on unhindered. Thank you.
I'm not sure how it works in all of the EU but here it always shows customs at entry port. The only customs i watch in Europe is Polish customs when I send samples for analysis and they are slow.
 
Guys in Europe, please consider trying the EU warehouse if you're having problems with customs clearance. The EU warehouse is located in prime EU country and should have a much lower risks to other EU countries than international shipments.
Overall the International warehouse does have a high success rate to most EU countries, but the EU warehouse should be even better.
Nonetheless, there will always be some risks involved with trying to acquire this type of product. Therefore, please check the laws and policies at your location and make sure you understand and can accept the associated risks.
 
Interesting these one was blind or with some logos on the cups etc, u know what I mean. Janushek could be compromised. There are a lot of sources talking about him, his is getting some benefits from some brands for good, acceptable results. Other places talking janushek in these days is 50%/50%. I remember phl in old days was using some swiss company and French, why not anymore?
Honestly i dont trust jano ive used eq and tren from another company with perfect jano testing and thought it was bunk, and used basic after and the difference was night and day
 
Back
Top