MESO-Rx

Anabolic Steroids

PHARMACOM TEST E MID CYCLE BLOODSBLOODS

Dema said:
Agreed and on the flip side of you call everyone a shill that post something good makes people not want to post their positive experinces!
Click to expand...
You also know that majority of the "positive experiences" are "got my gear in a couple days, did 2 pins and I think I'm up 10 lbs, such pretty labels, he replied to my emails" or one of my favorites "did first pin and now I'm getting boners all day!"
 
Do3Gs said:
You also know that majority of the "positive experiences" are "got my gear in a couple days, did 2 pins and I think I'm up 10 lbs, such pretty labels, he replied to my emails" or one of my favorites "did first pin and now I'm getting boners all day!"
Click to expand...

Very true. But I bet there would be more detailed positive reviews if people wouldn't get jumped right away being called a shill.
 
And now there are the same bloods, printed out, with writing and a date. The fishy thing is you siding with a UGL. UGL's are guilty until proven innocent and that can't be done. Members should be innocent until proven guilty. At the very least handled with a little respect.
 
Geterdun said:
Thank you for complying with everything asked of you. Probably is a good idea to unfollow Astro. The choice is yours to send it to Simec. Really won't make a difference in your case. I don't care what Pcom says 1766 is way low, hell,1100 if high normal correct?
Click to expand...

Simec does make a difference in this case. If Simec reports back its under dosed severely you know OP is a man of his word and he got bad gear. If Simec reports back its within tolerance of the labeled concentration then you know either OP doesn't know how to measure out his dose, is a 5th SD unicorn in hormone metabolism, or is falsifying blood work to benefit himself or bad mouth a lab.

I'm not saying OP is lying or telling the truth. All I'm saying is Simec testing results can always help an issue like this by bringing in an objective 3rd party.
 
Dema said:
Very true. But I bet there would be more detailed positive reviews if people wouldn't get jumped right away being called a shill.
Click to expand...
Typically the only people called out are the ones that have -10 posts and are only posting to receive some type of reimbursement. I can agree that "shill" gets tossed around a little too much sometimes and we need more contributing members giving reviews.
 
@Docd187123 this man supplied blood work as we have always asked members to do. Several times I might add. Dated, with Meso on it. His time line adds up. Sending it to Simec only feeds in to Pcoms BS. When I sign on to Anabolic Lab, the first thing I read is "HARM REDUCTION" he's not saying it's contaminated. Why are we asking so much of a member but nothing of a UGL? That's just nuts IMOo_O
 
Frank is a legend in his own mind. He posted another book saying that Pcom gear is better than Pharma gear because he uses Simec. He has went off the deep end man. He needs help if he thinks his gear compares to Pharma gear.
 
Geterdun said:
That doesn't mean shit! Dema get back in your thread!
Click to expand...

means a lot.... It's his first cycle.. If he is making gains even with that test number then he should stick with it and try not to worry about hitting a 3000+ test number.. Rather then have a horrible mind set from now on and writing this off as a lost... One can make great gains off that much test.... I'm not trying to change any facts about the gear or test as I've stated where I stand. But just trying to help mentally about his cycle... It's called caring about members not just trying to make source look bad all the time....
 
His test was 1766 way to low for gear Frank says is better than Pharma! So now numbers don't matter? We're going off what people say? Like shills right?
 
No I didn't, you and Frank have. If you haven't noticed, you are on the bottom of the shit pile. Wait, I read that somewhere else.
 
There's no reason he can't make gains off that test number. It doesn't mean it's not low but I get what dema is saying. OP shouldn't quit on the cycle he should keep it pushing.

Sent from my STV100-1 using Tapatalk
 
Geterdun said:
this man supplied blood work as we have always asked members to do.
Click to expand...
Don't take this as another attack but I have to ask because I've seen little things a couple times.

Have you been on Meso before under a different handle? You're post implies to me you've been here quite some time yet you've been a member 2 months.
 
He said he was doubling the injection I think. @Les, Dema is trying to skirt the issue. That gear is under dosed! not much above natty!
 
Geterdun said:
@Docd187123 this man supplied blood work as we have always asked members to do. Several times I might add. Dated, with Meso on it. His time line adds up. Sending it to Simec only feeds in to Pcoms BS. When I sign on to Anabolic Lab, the first thing I read is "HARM REDUCTION" he's not saying it's contaminated. Why are we asking so much of a member but nothing of a UGL? That's just nuts IMOo_O
Click to expand...

Again, this isn't directed at OP personally it's just general thoughts:

Bc blood work is only as good as the integrity of the man/woman reporting it. With crappy blood work we don't know if the person purposely dosed less than stated or did something else to alter the blood work. And conversely, with good blood work, you don't know if the person took more than they stated to artificially inflate their results.

To me a dated and Meso'd pic of blood work means nothing. The blood work may very well be his personally but who's to say he's running the gear of the lab he says he is, who's to say he's taking the dose he says he is, etc etc. a piece of paper with the date and meso on it just tells me someone wasted 15sec of their day (sorry OP not to bash you it just means it shouldn't have been asked of you).

Part of harm reduction is knowing the dose you're taking, it's not solely about gear being contaminated.

Please tell me how sending a sample to Simec is asking so much of a member and nothing of the UGL? Think about it, you're asking a member to ship a $30-60 vial to Simec. The member is out $30-60 temporarily bc this UGL says they'll replace the sample and then some and the member is also at minor risk of having the sample intercepted by the feds. What the UGL does not this case is shell out the $300 or more to have the sample tested by a company that has no reason to lie or manipulate and HPLC results aren't dependent upon the integrity of the member or UGL.
 
LMAO you and I agree I am an anti shill you stupid fuck Bwahahahaaaa I'm done wasting my time with your dumb ass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Delmann
1mg Arimidex too high?
2
Replies
27
Views
676
Delmann
Delmann
Alexlevi
Concerns over bad gear?
Replies
5
Views
106
Alexlevi
Alexlevi
T
Injection frequency 7ml
2
Replies
28
Views
417
egruberman
E
E
Test/Mast vs Test/Eq Cycle
Replies
5
Views
191
xrayphoton13
xrayphoton13
C
First cycle pct
Replies
0
Views
73
Cuccu
C

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top