Now you are just starting to sound like a pharmacom dick rider bro
I never said to buy from them or have ever endorsed them. Nice try though but fail. If you were to educate yourself more on blood work you'd know what you were talking about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now you are just starting to sound like a pharmacom dick rider bro
yeah haha, and I know he is!Is that ramy in your avi?Guy is a genetic beast.
You are the only one justifying the poor bloods.I never said to buy from them or have ever endorsed them. Nice try though but fail. If you were to educate yourself more on blood work you'd know what you were talking about.
You are the only one justifying the poor bloods.
We are talking dose x 2 in some cases.
Pharmacom themselves acknowledged it.
I've seen plenty of bloods on sust to know what is what.You still don't get it after I've explained it to you? The bloods cannot be compared to the 7-10x rule at all yet you keep trying to. My previous statement still stands: educate yourself more on bloodwork and you'll understand why you're wrong.
I've seen plenty of bloods on sust to know what is what.
Plus what about all the cyp and prop bloods?
I've seen plenty of bloods on sust to know what is what.
Plus what about all the cyp and prop bloods?
I'm turning over a new leaf"keep swinging from their nuts, schill"
Why you edit that part out buddy??
First link I posted was test e.You can't use prop or sust to compare the 7-10x rule is your first mistake. Cyp and enanthat yes. You've yet to post a single blood test that actually follows the protocol to compare against the rule. We'll talk about it once you do.
Nice catch Chuck Sipes! Lololol at the edit
Correct me if I am wrong but when you first showed up here didn't you argue against the 7-10x rule. I could be wrong. Ps I'm not picking sides.First link I posted was test e.
Ohh yeah, that was the "mix up"
Not inconsistent at all
Yep.Correct me if I am wrong but when you first showed up here didn't you argue against the 7-10x rule. I could be wrong. Ps I'm not picking sides.
Here is some test cyp showing really shitty
https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/pharmacom-test-c250-blood-results.134366063/
Ohh he was pinning a lot less. Not knowing what is actually in the vial, lolThat's a much better case to compare bc it's test cyp.
Blood tests are only as reliable as the person posting them is what I said earlier. Now after reading that thread, how much faith do you place in the OP's competence? You sure he was taking the correct dose he claimed he was after seeing his math? If yes then yes those are pretty bad bloods. If you don't believe it, and I'm leaning to not believing personally, he could've been pinning much less not knowing.
Ohh he was pinning a lot less. Not knowing what is actually in the vial, lol
Mind you I am only sticking to this forum. Inconsistent all over the place, unfortunately
OP asked a question and I answered him directly based on the data I have seen.
- mass spec on point
- lots of great bloods
- lots of terrible bloods
- lab max all over the place (though fwiw NO ugl has done well on this front)
Conclusion: inconsistent
And yes, there will always be variables to consider . Rival labs, shills, scammers and flat out retards
I was just trying to help the OP based on observation. Cut me some slack
Did you see his math dude or was I the only one to see it. I can't say for sure. Plus he hasn't been seen since so it's kinda tough to ask him.
