Pharmacon or not?

I never said to buy from them or have ever endorsed them. Nice try though but fail. If you were to educate yourself more on blood work you'd know what you were talking about.
You are the only one justifying the poor bloods.

We are talking dose x 2 in some cases.

Pharmacom themselves acknowledged it.
 
You are the only one justifying the poor bloods.

We are talking dose x 2 in some cases.

Pharmacom themselves acknowledged it.

You still don't get it after I've explained it to you? The bloods cannot be compared to the 7-10x rule at all yet you keep trying to. My previous statement still stands: educate yourself more on bloodwork and you'll understand why you're wrong.
 
You still don't get it after I've explained it to you? The bloods cannot be compared to the 7-10x rule at all yet you keep trying to. My previous statement still stands: educate yourself more on bloodwork and you'll understand why you're wrong.
I've seen plenty of bloods on sust to know what is what.

Plus what about all the cyp and prop bloods?
 
I've seen plenty of bloods on sust to know what is what.

Plus what about all the cyp and prop bloods?

You can't use prop or sust to compare the 7-10x rule is your first mistake. Cyp and enanthat yes. You've yet to post a single blood test that actually follows the protocol to compare against the rule. We'll talk about it once you do.

Nice catch Chuck Sipes! Lololol at the edit
 
You can't use prop or sust to compare the 7-10x rule is your first mistake. Cyp and enanthat yes. You've yet to post a single blood test that actually follows the protocol to compare against the rule. We'll talk about it once you do.

Nice catch Chuck Sipes! Lololol at the edit
First link I posted was test e.

Ohh yeah, that was the "mix up"

Not inconsistent at all
 
Correct me if I am wrong but when you first showed up here didn't you argue against the 7-10x rule. I could be wrong. Ps I'm not picking sides.
Yep.

I said that in this thread.

I'm by no means a 7-10x rule guy but that doesn't mean blood work is useless.

Anyways , I was called out to quantify my original statement, so I did. They are inconsistent. We are talking TT levels I see from Trt forums when these guys are on blast doses

I can get into the lab max but I personally don't put any stock in those
 

That's a much better case to compare bc it's test cyp.

Blood tests are only as reliable as the person posting them is what I said earlier. Now after reading that thread, how much faith do you place in the OP's competence? You sure he was taking the correct dose he claimed he was after seeing his math? If yes then yes those are pretty bad bloods. If you don't believe it, and I'm leaning to not believing personally, he could've been pinning much less not knowing.
 
That's a much better case to compare bc it's test cyp.

Blood tests are only as reliable as the person posting them is what I said earlier. Now after reading that thread, how much faith do you place in the OP's competence? You sure he was taking the correct dose he claimed he was after seeing his math? If yes then yes those are pretty bad bloods. If you don't believe it, and I'm leaning to not believing personally, he could've been pinning much less not knowing.
Ohh he was pinning a lot less. Not knowing what is actually in the vial, lol
 
Mind you I am only sticking to this forum. Inconsistent all over the place, unfortunately

OP asked a question and I answered him directly based on the data I have seen.

- mass spec on point
- lots of great bloods
- lots of terrible bloods
- lab max all over the place (though fwiw NO ugl has done well on this front)

Conclusion: inconsistent

And yes, there will always be variables to consider . Rival labs, shills, scammers and flat out retards

I was just trying to help the OP based on observation. Cut me some slack
 
You guys are getting way off track. This thread is not about educated discussion into bloods and gear. It is about flaming Bevis for asking a dumb question. Less big words, more telling him he is retarded and to suck balls!
 
Mind you I am only sticking to this forum. Inconsistent all over the place, unfortunately

OP asked a question and I answered him directly based on the data I have seen.

- mass spec on point
- lots of great bloods
- lots of terrible bloods
- lab max all over the place (though fwiw NO ugl has done well on this front)

Conclusion: inconsistent

And yes, there will always be variables to consider . Rival labs, shills, scammers and flat out retards

I was just trying to help the OP based on observation. Cut me some slack

Fair enough.
 
Did you see his math dude or was I the only one to see it. I can't say for sure. Plus he hasn't been seen since so it's kinda tough to ask him.

I did see the math. Who knows what he was actually pinning. 3ml, 300mg, 750mg. And was that once/wk? If 750mg/3ml, why would you pin once? Judging by my labs at 500mg/wk, I think he might have been pinning 300mg/wk for that result.
 
Back
Top