Possible Fake Trenbolone Acetate? No Effects After 1 Month

semencece1111

New Member
Hi everyone,

I need some advice and insights regarding my experience with trenbolone acetate. I started my cycle a month ago and I'm currently on 150mg per week. However, I've noticed something unusual — I haven't felt any of the expected effects or even side effects. In fact, my experience has been quite the opposite: I've been sleeping better than ever. No pumped look, no muscle hardness like tren gives you and no changes in strenght too

Here are the details:
Dosage: 150mg Tren , 500mg test, 300mg EQ
Duration: throw Tren A in like 1 month ago

Expected Effects: Increased muscle mass, strength, possible side effects like insomnia, night sweats, aggression

Actual Effects: No noticeable changes in muscle mass or strength, no side effects, improved sleep quality.

I'm concerned that the trenbolone acetate I have might be fake. Has anyone else had a similar experience?
Is it possible that my dose is too low to see any benefits? Are there any reliable methods to check if my trenbolone is genuine?

Any insights, personal experiences, or advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
How were your gains on the Test and EQ only?
Good, its not first time that i am running it. Before was on 750mg test, 400eq, i ran Deca too, everything was great on those compunds, size and strenght, was repping 160kg on bench, maybe is just too low dose for tren
 
24y 180cm cca 94kg, i would say around 12-15%
Have you ever taken tren ace before?

Regardless of your stats, 150 trenA added to the other compounds you have been taking you should notice some strength increases IMO. 150 mg of trenA for anyone IMO is enough to see gains especially for a first time tren user.

I would never gauge whether or not a product is real by the sides. Only way to know for sure is to send it in for HPLC testing.
 
Have you ever taken tren ace before?

Regardless of your stats, 150 trenA added to the other compounds you have been taking you should notice some strength increases IMO. 150 mg of trenA for anyone IMO is enough to see gains especially for a first time tren user.

I would never gauge whether or not a product is real by the sides. Only way to know for sure is to send it in for HPLC testing.

Never used tren ace before, yeah i know, i expected strenght increase too but nothing. I have left 2 more vials of this, dont know if i should use it or stop using it.
 
Never used tren ace before, yeah i know, i expected strenght increase too but nothing. I have left 2 more vials of this, dont know if i should use it or stop using it.
send it for testing and then stick to sources that have regular testing and offer testing credits.

Its 'probably' not fake, no one fakes tren since its so cheap, but there will be absolutely no way to tell for sure. Id just avoid any source that doesnt have testing in the future
 
send it for testing and then stick to sources that have regular testing and offer testing credits.

Its 'probably' not fake, no one fakes tren since its so cheap, but there will be absolutely no way to tell for sure. Id just avoid any source that doesnt have testing in the future
Agree with the statement to stick to sources that test although there is no guarantee that you get what they say they tested even if they stick the same batch number on the bottle.

Again, the only way to know for sure is to test it for yourself.

Also, the idea that tren is never faked is naive at best.

Ive seen sources fake sustanon and test is also very cheap. In the instance I remember, the sustanon had very low doses of prop and test e. One would think that being so cheap no one would fake it, but the reality is, that is not the case.

I've also seen amps faked that were supposed to be test as well as tren that had no active ingredient when independently tested.

Even if it wasn't faked, it can certainly be underdosed.The excuse I have seen from sources as well is that their brewer made some mistakes in calculations or mislabeled a bottle, etc..

Anyway, its great if a source tests their batches but with so many doing it these days it really doesn't mean much but sure, probably better to go with a source that at least does the minimum even though it guarantees nothing (no guarantees in this realm anyway).
 
Last edited:
Agree with the statement to stick to sources that test although there is no guarantee that you get what they say they tested even if they stick the same batch number on the bottle.

Again, the only way to know for sure is to test it for yourself.

Also, the idea that tren is never faked is naive at best.

Ive seen sources fake sustanon and test is also very cheap. In the instance I remember, the sustanon had very low doses of prop and test e. One would think that being so cheap no one would fake it, but the reality is, that is not the case.

I've also seen amps faked that were supposed to be test as well as tren that had no active ingredient when independently tested.

Even if it wasn't faked, it can certainly be underdosed.The excuse I have seen from sources as well is that their brewer made some mistakes in calculations or mislabeled a bottle, etc..

Anyway, its great if a source tests their batches but with so many doing it these days it really doesn't mean much but sure, probably better to go with a source that at least does the minimum even though it guarantees nothing (no guarantees in this realm anyway).
thank you for saying exactly what i already said, but with more words. you are a treasure to this community
 
thank you for saying exactly what i already said, but with more words. you are a treasure to this community
lol @ your lack of self awareness and inability to read.

You parroted what I said previously about testing, so...... yeah

Also, I clearly stated that your opinion that tren is never faked is naive at best. Is that what you meant to say? LOL.
 
Back
Top