tokorealand
New Member
28 male:
- Natty: 52
- 3IU(4 weeks): 336
- Natty: 52
- 3IU(4 weeks): 336
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Post up your Natty IGF-1 Level
- Thread starter malfeasance
- Start date
thoroughlyconfused
New Member
Is the natural level likely to go up with weight lost
AnTabolic73
Member
this was 8 years ago. I wasn't on test or anything at the time and way before I started hgh. I found it interesting my natty igf was high. My testosterone was considered normal but was at around 500 on this very test.Sicsemptyran
Member
IGF-1 is a wildly fickle thing. Low carb can hurt it, protein consumption can increase it. Anything that hurts your level lowers it. Poor metabolic health can hurt it. Lowering body fat can help it, losing too much weight can nuke it.
malfeasance
Member
Hey, look, everybody, somebody finally had a lower natty number than me!
tokorealand
New Member
So since I need HGH more than you. Plz send me all your pharmaHey, look, everybody, somebody finally had a lower natty number than me!
JuiceStick
Member
Mid 40s male
No baseline
Ran 4 months of Mod. GRF + Ipa at 0.2mg before bedtime 5 days a week. Took one month break before testing.
Results came in at 170
Will be upping to 0.3mg.
I get slight PIP from Sermorelin, more PIP from Tesamorelin and no PIP from Mod.GRF/Ipa.
No baseline
Ran 4 months of Mod. GRF + Ipa at 0.2mg before bedtime 5 days a week. Took one month break before testing.
Results came in at 170
Will be upping to 0.3mg.
I get slight PIP from Sermorelin, more PIP from Tesamorelin and no PIP from Mod.GRF/Ipa.
AlexDavis43
Member
"Took one month break before testing"
So basically 170 is your baseline
Still thanks for the feedback. If you have the option (and remember), check IGF1 on 0.3 mg.
SeriousPickles
New Member
50 yrs old
TRT for 6 months
IGF1 232 ng/ml
TRT for 6 months
IGF1 232 ng/ml
My natty pre testosterone igf-1 was at 207 I was 40 at the time. Running 2iu I've been as high as 434 and as low as around 330ish. The blood work while running HGH was around 24 hours after pinning, not sure if that matters.
Attachments
malfeasance
Member
That part does not matter. IGF-1 is more persistent than that. All that really matters is that you were running it for a month or so prior to testing.
Got it. Yea I was running HGH at 2iu for about 5 months at that point.
malfeasance
Member
Those seem like very high numbers, then, for 2 iu. A lot of folks around here think 2iu is not enough to matter.
If it takes you from 207 to a range of 330-434, then it is damn well worth it.
If it takes you from 207 to a range of 330-434, then it is damn well worth it.
What's crazy is that at 434 I was on 2iu and on my next test on Feb 8th of this year I was on 6iu since Jan 1st and my result was lower.
Since then I've worked up to 10iu and will be doing blood work mid April so I wonder how that will show up. For 90% of my time on HGH I've been running QSC 36iu that tested around 41iu, I calculate my doses as if each vial has 40iu.
Since then I've worked up to 10iu and will be doing blood work mid April so I wonder how that will show up. For 90% of my time on HGH I've been running QSC 36iu that tested around 41iu, I calculate my doses as if each vial has 40iu.
Attachments
AlexDavis43
Member
Your results on 2 IU (350 & 434) are higher than Meso averages.
The result on 6 IU (341) is lower than predicted average. On a diet or something else changed? You seem like a good IGF1 responder otherwise.
Last edited:
The 350 was 8 weeks into a bulk and the 434 was about a week after the bulk. The 341 was at the end of a cut.
malfeasance
Member
Just FYI - restricted calories very typically results in lowered IGF-1 numbers.
I shoved mine all the way down to 53 on 3 or 4 iu during prep.
AlexDavis43
Member
it would've probably been at least 200 in someone who wasn't the worst IGF1 responder ever
Similar threads
