BabaJagga
Member
big bicep is not attractive muscle, training sucks cause its boring and its more like "party muscle" for other guys to admire in club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When I started training I didn't put much emphasis on my biceps. because I didn't want to be a stereotypic gym bro with a big biceps so I went harder on my legs. But now I want a big biceps as well.big bicep is not attractive muscle, training sucks cause its boring and its more like "party muscle" for other guys to admire in club.
Moderate to high test doses make you look blocky and puffy. Your waist and face just look bigger the more test you take
You just contradicted your own statement lol. So you disagree with test making you look puffy but then admit that you enjoy the puffy look from high test …Yeah, every pro with 1,5gr look puffy and blocky . It's the diet bro, in conjunction with estradiol levels and body fat percentage.
Also, just my personal taste.. I'd prefer to look full, swollen and puffy than stringy lean and flat.
so, even with 1,5g of test, persons face shouldnt look puffy in aggresive deficit, right?Yeah, every pro with 1,5gr look puffy and blocky . It's the diet bro, in conjunction with estradiol levels and body fat percentage.
Also, just my personal taste.. I'd prefer to look full, swollen and puffy than stringy lean and flat.
You just contradicted your own statement lol. So you disagree with test making you look puffy but then admit that you enjoy the puffy look from high test …
And look at the faces of most of those pros
They’re bodies look lean but they have faces of 30% bf
Well, I can't say it "shouldn't", also how could i know what anyone does with his diet? Maybe someone is at 1000kcal deficit but he has a big amount of sodium, a big amount of HGH and the genetic predisposition to hold water in the face.so, even with 1,5g of test, persons face shouldnt look puffy in aggresive deficit, right?
I prefer the anorexic death face look personally and higher test dose would only make it harder.No i didn't. I said i would prefer, not that is happening now.
30%? Dude, i think you're exaggerating. Ofc they not look anorexic, the "death face" from 20-30 years ago is not common nowadays but puffy faces? From all the people i ve seen only one looks like he holds too much water in the face (Robin Strand) but besides him I don't recall seeing anyone else.
It may not look puffy but it definitely won’t look as lean as it should be. Your face will still hold noticeable water retention just from the testosterone itself regardless of estrogen and bf%so, even with 1,5g of test, persons face shouldnt look puffy in aggresive deficit, right?
If you want to look lean and aesthetic as possible less test is better. You’ll burn fat easier on a low / no test base cycleyou don't always need a test base. shoot me.
you are probably right. from my short experince on 500mg of test, first 2 weeks i looked water filled air baloon. after i took ai for first week, i pissed like firefighter truck and it went away 80%. i hated that look on my face, couple of people told me i look swollen in face and asked if im okay. its much better now than before, i look smaller but better imo, not water inflated arms etc.Well, I can't say it "shouldn't", also how could i know what anyone does with his diet? Maybe someone is at 1000kcal deficit but he has a big amount of sodium, a big amount of HGH and the genetic predisposition to hold water in the face.
Also, what someone thinks looks puffy, someone else might find it normal. It's a little subjective i believe.
Low test burns fat better than high test? Could you articulate how that works assuming e2 is controlled across both examples?If you want to look lean and aesthetic as possible less test is better. You’ll burn fat easier on a low / no test base cycle
sounds weird.Low test burns fat better than high test?
I prefer the anorexic death face look personally and higher test dose would only make it harder.
Point is more test will make a person look less leaner than they are. 150mg vs 700mg test there’s a huge difference in mineral retention that can’t be combated with ai
typically men with low testosterone aren't injecting tren and glp1'sLow test burns fat better than high test? Could you articulate how that works assuming e2 is controlled across both examples?
I find difficulty on surface level because men with low test tend to store more body fat and are less insulin sensitive and partition nutrients less favorably