MESO-Rx Sponsor Primal Pharma - US Domestic

[Photon]

Have Janos standard deviations been mentioned?

Yes 2%.
Not 10%.

 

[AlexDavis43]

If you've followed this thread, dudes been lying since he joined 6 months ago..multiple tc vials sent for testing..no results, even gone as far as to say Jano forgot to test..multiple raws sent for testing..no results anywhere. Primo raws used for brewing?..was just reselling Chinese gear..sending eq for testing, waited for results but nothing actually sent.

The only way to actually know what you're using..is to test..not one but all vials you're using. Ones just not sufficient if you've seen the testing results.

you did all the work putting this together, might as well include the link for someone new who is asking questions

 

[Targeted]

Have Janos standard deviations been mentioned? I mean 250x.9=225. So ignoring the standard deviation some of these compounds are almost within 10%

Plastic contamination obviously needs some attention…

But I remember when qsc had hgh kits jano testing something wild like 99.98… they were good but gtfoh they weren’t that

Yes 2%.
Not 10%.

I wasn’t referring to 10% as a standard deviation. My understanding is within 10% is considered acceptable.

 

[osqe]

I wasn’t referring to 10% as a standard deviation. My understanding is within 10% is considered acceptable.

Acceptable to whom exactly?
For example, I don't want to be pinning 40mg/day Tren A when I thought it was 50mg/day because the 100mg/ml vial is 10% underdosed.

 

[Nsbb]

Acceptable to whom exactly?
For example, I don't want to be pinning 40mg/day Tren A when I thought it was 50mg/day because the 100mg/ml vial is 10% underdosed.

That would make it 20% underdosed lol. But I get your point.

Personally I like to see <5%

 

[osqe]

That would make it 20% underdosed lol. But I get your point.

Personally I like to see <5%

God damn I'm retarded lol

 

[Targeted]

God damn I'm retarded lol

So back to the point you actually made— do you think 45 would change anything?

I remember within 10% being acceptable. Should we rely on my memory? Hell no

Has it lowered with better testing— probably.

However it’s the worst time in history to buy raws. Did anyone notice anything else about primal? He actually has some. Have you noticed his prices?

Waiting to brew for raw testing to come back has a ton of draw backs. Inventory management exponentially, prices etc

Are you rolling the dice? Yes. But in this market?

I’m hearing a bunch of guys out of the game looking at historic decisions with 100% info in a vacuum. But after entertaining a guy pinning 1 or 2 mls of crashed gear into his stomach anything is possible

 

[osqe]

do you think 45 would change anything?

Yes, less Tren is enough for me to be a whiny bitch about.
Does it change anything, though?
Maybe, but whether it would or not isn't something I can prove and wouldn't bother trying to.
All I know is one line goes higher, and I want that one. If the 100mg/ml vial was 2% underdosed as @Photon mentioned (I tried math again, don't bully me), then it would be 49mg, I think. Much closer, and I wouldn't be butthurt.
45mg/day (10%)

49mg/day (2%)

50mg/day

 

[Jron]

Curious if raws are soooo expensive why are the unlabeled Chinese black top primo vials that I got for 80 a piece so cheap? They tested within 10% of acceptable range too. So far, only downside is they use EO??