You're right. Testing makes an opinion fact, and he has Z E R O. ZERO!!
We've had a couple of newbies like you come in spitting fire and quickly shown the door lately. But you've managed to demonstrate more belligerent worthlessness in the couple of weeks since you joined than any of them.
In light of recent events, the attacks on my suggestion that Terminal Sterilization could be a useful incremental step in harm reduction are even more absurd. The black flecks are a blessing. A visual indicator that vial is no longer sterile. What about vials that have been compromised but show no visible sign? This is not a criticism of QSC, every vial from any source that hasn't been tested or Terminally Sterilized could be infected, and many probably are, even if they don't cause immediate illness.
Educate yourself on the difference between "Sterile" and "Bacteriostatic", where bacteria are present, but simply live in suspended animation, only to be dealt with by the immune system post injection.
What test is it you're looking for? The same one Declan is? Proof a non-sterile vial of UGL or home brew gear exists? Of course they exist, no one in their right mind doubts that.
You know what doesn't need to be tested?
That the FDA approved Terminal Sterilization Procedure for Test Cyp is effective at rendering a sterile vial of the product.
It has to be validated by every compounding pharmacy that uses it, most commonly by introducing bacteria into the product, then testing it after to ensure bacteria is reduced to 1 part per million or less.
This formula makes just 5 10ml vials of Test-Cyp.
The process and ingredients are essentially the same as a homebrewer or UGL would follow, not some pharma factory with specialized equipment. The pharmacy isn't even required by the FDA to use sterile equipment or ingredients if the last step is Terminal Sterilization. That's how effective it is.
Whether a homebrewer, UGL, or end user performs Terminal Sterilization, there's nothing but upside and greater safety. That's why it's worth exploring. Attending to details like adapting this process so it can be safely replicated in non-lab grade ovens, and to other compounds.
That is what harm reduction looks like.
It starts with curiosity, asking "Could this be better? Safer?", and in this crowd, the willingness to put up with personal attacks and insults from those who take personal offense to the status quo being disturbed.
If anti-harm reduction had a lobbyist, they'd say something like this:
Qsc has probably sold more testosterone than any FDA approved pharmaceutical company this year. Has one person been sickened or died? No. Not one. Any infections? Also none.
You may think you're building clout by gaining approval within the loudmouth bubble of Declan's little clique, but MESO is dominated by a quiet majority of long term members who are deep thinkers and those with intellectual curiosity who recognize what I'm proposing as valid, and see your baseless criticism for what it is.
I'm going to start a dedicated thread for this in the Steroid forum, and hopefully you'll have the good sense to stick to objective, constructive comments, or say nothing at all.
@Millard
