Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

Looks like I didn't plan to raise enough the prices :rolleyes:

I have an idea, we can add an extra $30 per kit, a total of $50 extra per kit, and provide you LMCS screening, sterility, endotoxins and heavy metals testing per batch, let's vote it.

If you agree, make a love reaction.

If you disagree with the extra costs of extra testing, comment: "fuck readalot" and in this case, there will be no extra increase in prices.
I'll pass on the extra testing personally, but better filtration to eliminate floaters, better stoppers (no tear off caps), and a proper fill of 10ml would be a blessing
 
Also please lay out the proposed sampling plan per batch for each of the assays you stated at the total cost of 3 USD per vial. As another used asked, are you pulling a single vial per batch? Details to go along with assays plus the cost you locked in would complete the offer.

Share your sampling plan with the community and how you will accomplish the testing (lab, etc). That way folks can make an informed vote.

Thanks.
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals

let me be clear. Without a thoughtful, logically laid out plan for sampling per batch and the chain of custody required, this will all appear to be a shrewd yet empty promise to improve the QC/QA on your products and improve surveillance in the market. A simple cash grab.

So please bring it when it comes to how you will ensure proper sampling and testing without fraud.

 
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals

let me be clear. Without a thoughtful, logically laid out plan for sampling per batch and the chain of custody required, this will all appear to be a shrewd yet empty promise to improve the QC/QA on your products and improve surveillance in the market. A simple cash grab.

So please bring it when it comes to how you will ensure proper sampling and testing without fraud.

Now u gotta be trolling
 
Now u gotta be trolling
Would be wasting everyone's time and money without full transparency on this. I don't want people to waste their money or be scammed by empty promises or a failed plan from the start. If the plan and chain of custody makes no sense, I surely won't endorse it.
 
Your junky mindset is why this community [AAS community] will always be a joke.
The community is fine and dandy. You on the other hand...
Looks like narta will be the first to write the « fuck readalot »
Nope. If he gets to fuck he maybe come into his senses
3.) same gear, more expensive, solves PR problem because people think its safe now because 1 random vial was tested.
This.
 
5 love reactions
5 "fuck readalot"s

Who's gonna be the winner in the next hours ... !
All just for entertainment till you address my questions and lay out plan for sampling and chain of custody.

No one is winning anything. Stepping up on the plan would be a requirement though for you to be taken serious.

Hint: you are going to have to put some skin in this game.
 
@Qingdao Sigma Chemicals

let me be clear. Without a thoughtful, logically laid out plan for sampling per batch and the chain of custody required, this will all appear to be a shrewd yet empty promise to improve the QC/QA on your products and improve surveillance in the market. A simple cash grab.

So please bring it when it comes to how you will ensure proper sampling and testing without fraud.

Obviously I won't be reading all this shit otherwise I will have to charge an extra $50/kit for reading this, but you can explain what is the criteria of choosing the samples to not become fraudulent in few simple words, it might be charged an extra $5-$10 for the effort
 
He's saying starting and stopping is increasingly (anecdotally) linked to a lack of effect/response later on. So If you use it for a cut and stop now, don't expect it to just work the same way next time you want to use it for a cut
Dug,
A lot of the info you're posting is incorrect and may actually cause others harm. You need stop making posts like this and make sure you understand the research & evidence.

"Switching" is not that simple with these GLPs and glucose control medications like metformin. This is a complex dance that, admittedly, I don't understand well enough to comment on. But so far, I do know, it's not that simple.

Further, you need to check @Ghoul's posts and many of the other members who provide documented evidence on the efficacy of "cycling" GLPs... it's adverse to what you suggest.
Tell me, if efficacy doesn't decrease over time, why do clinically, in diabetic patients, they do increase the dose every few weeks/months?
 
All just for entertainment till you address my questions and lay out plan for sampling and chain of custody.

No one is winning anything. Stepping up on the plan would be a requirement though for you to be taken serious.

Hint: you are going to have to put some skin in this game.
Lebron James Lol GIF by Uninterrupted
 
Back
Top