Swolemates365
Member
Is Tracy a woman, Man or a Ladyboy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We call that the boogie fish. When you dive at night the only thing you can see is the light from your flashlight. Kind of creepy yet peaceful AF.Sharks and big fish and whatever else down there No thank you
That would take the intelligence of a 4th grader, why would anyone do that?have you checked QSC’s profile to see their latest messages?
YesAre hot dogs a sandwich?
YesIs a melt grilled cheese?
No, the outside has to be pasta to be a ravioli. But grape jelly in a ravioli sounds delicious.Is pop tart a ravioli
What's the difference between pasta and bread, other than preparation method? Eggs, water, flour. Boom. Poptart = ravioliWe call that the boogie fish. When you dive at night the only thing you can see is the light from your flashlight. Kind of creepy yet peaceful AF.
That would take the intelligence of a 4th grader, why would anyone do that?
Yes
Yes
No, the outside has to be pasta to be a ravioli. But grape jelly in a ravioli sounds delicious.
if you were to hypothetically travel at the speed of light and turn on your headlights, the light from them would still travel at the speed of light relative to you, meaning you would see the headlights function normally as the light would always leave your car at the speed of light regardless of your car's speedWhat happens if you’re going in a car faster than the speed of light and you turn on your headlights?
So a bagel is Jewish doughnut?What's the difference between pasta and bread, other than preparation method? Eggs, water, flour. Boom. Poptart = ravioli
What happens if you’re going in a car faster than the speed of light and you turn on your headlights?
In your frame of reference, theoretically, yes. That’s what relativity tells us. What does an observer see? Which frame of reference is correct? And let’s not forget the theory of relativity is still technically just a theory and that cars can’t go faster than the speed of light.if you were to hypothetically travel at the speed of light and turn on your headlights, the light from them would still travel at the speed of light relative to you, meaning you would see the headlights function normally as the light would always leave your car at the speed of light regardless of your car's speed
Bagels are Jewish already, so, kinda?So a bagel is Jewish doughnut?
Wouldn't the headlights not function normally? Would you not just see the same single moment of time, minus any objects not traveling with you at that speed, that was visible to you at the very moment you reached the speed of light? If you are traveling at c and you're saying the light emitted from your headlights is also traveling at c as you observe it, then the implaction is that the light is traveling at c^2 squared now, is it not? And is that not impossible according to Relativity?In your frame of reference, theoretically, yes. That’s what relativity tells us. What does an observer see? Which frame of reference is correct? And let’s not forget the theory of relativity is still technically just a theory and that cars can’t go faster than the speed of light.
I majored in astrophysics and this was a recurring question that would have us debating for hours at a time. I was also just there for the liquid nitrogen mai tais.
It is still the same. It's not the 17-23 fragment.Just read from earlier in this thread that QSC's TB-500 is actually full sequence TB-4.
Jano report lists it as TB-500 (TB-4): Janoshik Analytical
Assuming I've been messing up the dosing frequency in that case, as they had it listed on their price list as simply "TB500".
Anyone know if TB-4 can be dosed twice per week like TB-500 or is it ideally dosed daily?

if you were a hot dog and you were starving would you eat yourself?Are hot dogs a sandwich?
Hey, completely unrelated, do you know why Marilyn Manson had his bottom ribs removed?if you were a hot dog and you were starving would you eat yourself?
First off, the car is traveling *faster* than the speed of light. Second, the theory of relativity states that the headlights are in your reference frame (if you are in the car). Think of it this way. If you’re on a train and you jump up and you’re no longer anchored to the train, do you end up a few feet back by the time you land because the train is going faster than you? You don’t, because you’re still in the reference frame of the train. Same for the theoretical headlights. There’s a classical physics demo where the prof shoots a ball straight up out of a model train. The ball maintains its speed along the x/y axis, which was the speed of the train and whatever acceleration it gained along the z axis from the propellant that launched it in the air. It will maintain all of that unless a force acts on it. In this case, the force is gravity, so you go up, decelerate, stop, come down. If no other force acts on the ball, the speed along the x/y axis remains the same and the ball will trace out a parabola and end exactly where it started from (same for you from the reference frame of an observer because from your reference frame, you just go up and then back down). Anyway, the headlights. They’ll go out in front of the car for the same reasons. Unless you’re an observer, and then you have a different reference frame. But now also consider that nothing goes faster than the speed of light. So whatever multiverse you’re in (and it isn’t ours) might have completely different laws of physics.Wouldn't the headlights not function normally? Would you not just see the same single moment of time, minus any objects not traveling with you at that speed, that was visible to you at the very moment you reached the speed of light? If you are traveling at c and you're saying the light emitted from your headlights is also traveling at c as you observe it, then the implaction is that the light is traveling at c^2 squared now, is it not? And is that not impossible according to Relativity?
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Just to confirm it IS the 17-23 fragment right? According to the jano comment.It is still the same. It's not the 17-23 fragment.
Jano adds that to the comments section of a report like this:
View attachment 316970
**edit: So technically the trad Tb4 2-3times/wk works, but in mg not the microgram dosages that is enough for the frags.
Tb 1-4, 17-23 e.t.c dosage is confusing anyway
Isn’t that an example of modern mythology? When we were kids, the ongoing theory was so he could administer autofellatio, but then some asshole blasted that teenage boy dream.Hey, completely unrelated, do you know why Marilyn Manson had his bottom ribs removed?
Yep. I just couldn't resist the joke. Hotdog.... Eating yourself.... Too good to pass upIsn’t that an example of modern mythology? When we were kids, the ongoing theory was so he could administer autofellatio, but then some asshole blasted that teenage boy dream.
Perfect summary of what illegal immigration has done to the country. 20 years ago it was "who is going to pick the crops".Don't let the lefties gaslight you. They're not predominantly "picking strawberries". Skilled construction trades like roofing and sheet rocking, formerly decent middle class jobs, were overrun by illegal labor and the corrupt employers who benefit from them undercut legal workers and straight contractors, effectively pricing them out of competitiveness.
Once the first anchor baby arrives, the $20,000 cost of birth absorbed by the hospital and taxpayer(who do you think pays for it?), leading to the closing of many maternity units, that new citizen is entitled to the entire gamut of public benefits. Many other forms of welfare then flow from at least one citizen being in the household. With no income declared, this "impoverished" family is entitled to everything from free healthcare to energy assistance.
Meanwhile each of the children brought with the group will be enrolled in public schools at a cost of $15,000-$25,000 each, per year to local residents.
It's the most vulnerable Americans who shoulder the costs of the "cheap" labor that primarily benefits businesses and the wealthy, The lower middle class don't own businesses, aren't routinely eating at restaurants, enjoying housekeeping and landscaping services, or having new homes built.
