Qingdao Sigma Chemical Co., Ltd (International, US, EU, Canada and Australia domestic

[egruberman]

End welfare and we have Americans back to work.

To what degree do you think that Americans on welfare are more of a burden to society than Americans that have no other means of subsistence? Surely some will figure something out, but there will always be a subset of the population that lack the ability to generate enough economic activity to support themselves. There are likely many reasons for this, not least of which is the fact that 10% of Americans have an IQ of 80 or lower. They're not even competent enough that the military is willing to put them to use. What do you propose happens to those folks?

Undoubtedly the US needs a thorough reform in immigration. We should be attracting professionals that we need and that would be it. Canada and Australia do that. If we need doctors, import doctors. If we need nurses, import nurses. Etc etc. The way things are today, you either get people at the very top of the food chain or at the very bottom.

You imagine there's a switch someone can flip somewhere that says, "bring me more doctors, more nurses."? That's not how these things work. People with that set of qualifications would need an incentive to immigrate.

For those complaining about illegal immigrants that represent a supply of cheap labor for jobs that would otherwise go unfilled, I"m wondering what net economic impact you would expect if that flow of cheap labor was cut off?

Food, certainly becomes more expensive. Home construction and renovation becomes more expensive. Presumably, the supply of housing diminishes driving up prices and the American dream becomes further out of reach for the working class. With shelter and food being the primary contributors to the cost of living for the working class in the US, I'm sure everything will be fine.

So yeah, kick them fuckers out!

 

[Ghoul]

To what degree do you think that Americans on welfare are more of a burden to society than Americans that have no other means of subsistence? Surely some will figure something out, but there will always be a subset of the population that lack the ability to generate enough economic activity to support themselves. There are likely many reasons for this, not least of which is the fact that 10% of Americans have an IQ of 80 or lower. They're not even competent enough that the military is willing to put them to use. What do you propose happens to those folks?



You imagine there's a switch someone can flip somewhere that says, "bring me more doctors, more nurses."? That's not how these things work. People with that set of qualifications would need an incentive to immigrate.

For those complaining about illegal immigrants that represent a supply of cheap labor for jobs that would otherwise go unfilled, I"m wondering what net economic impact you would expect if that flow of cheap labor was cut off?

Food, certainly becomes more expensive. Home construction and renovation becomes more expensive. Presumably, the supply of housing diminishes driving up prices and the American dream becomes further out of reach for the working class. With shelter and food being the primary contributors to the cost of living for the working class in the US, I'm sure everything will be fine.

So yeah, kick them fuckers out!

First of all your suggestion that the US military is some repository for idiots ("even the military can't put those low iq people to use") shows how little you understand of the modern armed forces in addition to the typical leftist contempt for those who volunteer to serve,

And let's cut the shit, You're undoubtedly a union supporter, You understand "Scabs", those who'll work for less, drive down wages simply by a willingness to accept lower pay , not "filling a job no one else will do".

Illegals are an army of millions of "scabs", putting downward pressure on wages for, especially, Americans at the lower end of the economic scale.

There was no problem filling construction jobs at the wages appropriate for them. Importing illegal labor willing to do it for less is not "filling jobs that would otherwise go unfilled".

And you're not entitled to cheap landscaping, housekeeping service, or less expensive restaurant meals while others foot the enormous costs illegals impose on the communities they live in. Driving up housing costs, burdening schools, and consuming benefits that should go to tax paying citizens and legal residents,

Mow your own fucking lawn.

 

[HeavyLiftr]

I agree. It would be a waste of time and effort. Just as most things are here. This place is a source board and infested with weight watcher members who don’t lift and not much can be done when sources are untouchable. The only good putting together a list of all QSC’s wrong doings would do is to put it in everyone’s face what has been allowed to transpire here without a perma-ban. You don’t see many vets still around here who were knowledgeable and respected but you still see those same guys on other forums. You should ask yourself why is that.

My energy will be focused elsewhere as I’m trying for my 3rd attempt at a pro-card.

This thread has become a shit show. Go get your pro card bud!

 

[Country Club Hero]

First of all your suggestion that the US military is some repository for idiots ("even the military can't put those low iq people to use") shows how little you understand of the modern armed forces in addition to the typical leftist contempt for those who volunteer to serve,

And let's cut the shit, You're undoubtedly a union supporter, You understand "Scabs", those who'll work for less, drive down wages simply by a willingness to accept lower pay , not "filling a job no one else will do".

Illegals are an army of millions of "scabs", putting downward pressure on wages for, especially, Americans at the lower end of the economic scale.

There was no problem filling construction jobs at the wages appropriate for them. Importing illegal labor willing to do it for less is not "filling jobs that would otherwise go unfilled".

And you're not entitled to cheap landscaping, housekeeping service, or less expensive restaurant meals while others foot the enormous costs illegals impose on the communities they live in. Driving up housing costs, burdening schools, and consuming benefits that should go to tax paying citizens and legal residents,

Mow your own fucking lawn.

Amen. Well put.

 

[Swolemates365]

So if Raw supply is supposed to be coming back to normal, Tracy should be heading back to fill these reahips

 

[Clover 0080]

If a man is in the woods and speaks and there are no women, is he still wrong ?

Yes

 

[Petarosus188]

So if Raw supply is supposed to be coming back to normal, Tracy should be heading back to fill these reahips

Did I miss something in this insane thread? Where did you get info about raws?

 

[Swolemates365]

Did I miss something in this insane thread? Where did you get info about raws?

GA was talking about it, and a domestic source I rep For on another board mentioned his supplier said something as well.

 

[BamaCrazy]

Checking in this morning. Yep. The thread is still full of information and discussions about everything except bodybuilding, fitness, harm reduction and steroids.

 

[CharlesV]

From GA:

bringing some news for you guys,
production is expected to be back again in at least one month from now, hopefully with having the raw supply back to normal again

 

[buffaloindierock]

Checking in this morning. Yep. The thread is still full of information and discussions about everything except bodybuilding, fitness, harm reduction and steroids.

Maybe they should have other threads in other parts of this forum dedicated to these topics.

 

[BamaCrazy]

Maybe they should have other threads in other parts of this forum dedicated to these topics.

To the topics I listed? This entire forum is supposedly dedicated to them. It’s a steroid and weightlifting/bodybuilding forum.

Unless you mean threads dedicated to politics and other nonsense. Then yea, maybe.

 

[mikeh1998]

 

[mvl]

First of all your suggestion that the US military is some repository for idiots ("even the military can't put those low iq people to use") shows how little you understand of the modern armed forces in addition to the typical leftist contempt for those who volunteer to serve,

And let's cut the shit, You're undoubtedly a union supporter, You understand "Scabs", those who'll work for less, drive down wages simply by a willingness to accept lower pay , not "filling a job no one else will do".

Illegals are an army of millions of "scabs", putting downward pressure on wages for, especially, Americans at the lower end of the economic scale.

There was no problem filling construction jobs at the wages appropriate for them. Importing illegal labor willing to do it for less is not "filling jobs that would otherwise go unfilled".

And you're not entitled to cheap landscaping, housekeeping service, or less expensive restaurant meals while others foot the enormous costs illegals impose on the communities they live in. Driving up housing costs, burdening schools, and consuming benefits that should go to tax paying citizens and legal residents,

Mow your own fucking lawn.

That post in no way implied the army was a repository for idiots, it's just factually correct, someone with an IQ of <80 would find it basically impossible to pass the ASVAB. Let's not pretend that since Vietnam the military has been recruiting rocket scientists and mathematicians, there's obviously above-average people in the service but you won't find many amongst the enlisted.

You know most leftists(including straight up Socialists and Communists) don't actually like illegal immigration, right? That's a Liberal thing because they want their indentured servants.

The difference is that Liberals don't see how the United States purposely destabilizes countries, especially in South America to create this reserve army of labour to suppress wages in the first place. It's possible to have sympathy for these people and also understand the circumstances that caused the current situation.

 

[Middus]

That post in no way implied the army was a repository for idiots, it's just factually correct, someone with an IQ of <80 would find it basically impossible to pass the ASVAB. Let's not pretend that since Vietnam the military has been recruiting rocket scientists and mathematicians, there's obviously above-average people in the service but you won't find many amongst the enlisted.

You know most leftists(including straight up Socialists and Communists) don't actually like illegal immigration, right? That's a Liberal thing because they want their indentured servants.

The difference is that Liberals don't see how the United States purposely destabilizes countries, especially in South America to create this reserve army of labour to suppress wages in the first place. It's possible to have sympathy for these people and also understand the circumstances that caused the current situation.

My Pocket guides my choices. There is ME in EconoME!!

 

[powdered_toast_man]

First off, the car is traveling *faster* than the speed of light. Second, the theory of relativity states that the headlights are in your reference frame (if you are in the car). Think of it this way. If you’re on a train and you jump up and you’re no longer anchored to the train, do you end up a few feet back by the time you land because the train is going faster than you? You don’t, because you’re still in the reference frame of the train. Same for the theoretical headlights. There’s a classical physics demo where the prof shoots a ball straight up out of a model train. The ball maintains its speed along the x/y axis, which was the speed of the train and whatever acceleration it gained along the z axis from the propellant that launched it in the air. It will maintain all of that unless a force acts on it. In this case, the force is gravity, so you go up, decelerate, stop, come down. If no other force acts on the ball, the speed along the x/y axis remains the same and the ball will trace out a parabola and end exactly where it started from (same for you from the reference frame of an observer because from your reference frame, you just go up and then back down). Anyway, the headlights. They’ll go out in front of the car for the same reasons. Unless you’re an observer, and then you have a different reference frame. But now also consider that nothing goes faster than the speed of light. So whatever multiverse you’re in (and it isn’t ours) might have completely different laws of physics.
You can see how this all can become a mindfuck to think about.

Minus the 10th grade first day of high school physics lesson (lol), I think I just realized a fundamental misunderstanding I have always had upon reading your post.

I thought that the speed of light was the limiting rate speed of any object in the universe, and that light travels at this speed regardless of the observer. In other words, I incorrectly thought that if I am traveling at velocity x, then light is traveling at (c-x) speed faster than me as I would observe it. But now I think, if I understand you correctly, that no matter how fast I am moving, light appears to be moving at c as I would measure it, not (c-x).

Do I have it right now?

 

[MESO-Rx Administrator]

Important reminder:

Explainer Thread 'Political discussion belongs in the "Political Discourse" subforum...'

Jan 29, 2024

Political discussion belongs in the "Political Discourse" subforum unless it is directly relevant to anabolic steroids and performance-enhancing drugs e.g. new AAS legislation, anti-doping laws, etc. Political discussion includes, but is not limited to, off-topic political rants, as well as partisan attacks based on Member political orientation.

Members who repeatedly disregard this guidance could be prohibited from participating in certain threads subject to the discretion of the Administration.

Political Discourse

Discuss the state of government.

thinksteroids.com

• MESO-Rx Administrator
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Principles and Frameworks

• 
• 

 

[Ghoul]

That post in no way implied the army was a repository for idiots, it's just factually correct, someone with an IQ of <80 would find it basically impossible to pass the ASVAB. Let's not pretend that since Vietnam the military has been recruiting rocket scientists and mathematicians, there's obviously above-average people in the service but you won't find many amongst the enlisted.

You know most leftists(including straight up Socialists and Communists) don't actually like illegal immigration, right? That's a Liberal thing because they want their indentured servants.

The difference is that Liberals don't see how the United States purposely destabilizes countries, especially in South America to create this reserve army of labour to suppress wages in the first place. It's possible to have sympathy for these people and also understand the circumstances that caused the current situation.

I don't believe for a moment that people who, largely, believe the US is an illegitimate country, "stolen" from "brown people", and "built by slaves", has any right to exist, never mind control its own borders and immigration policy. That's a privledge exclusively reserved for righteous, legitimate countries like Mexico and Cuba.

The millions pouring over the southern border are just taking back what's rightfully theirs, aren't they?

 

[egruberman]

First of all

Please try again. You addressed nothing and presume much. If you want to argue against the imaginary bullshit in your head, please do so without troubling the rest of us with it.

 

[readalot]

Important reminder:

Explainer Thread 'Political discussion belongs in the "Political Discourse" subforum...'

Jan 29, 2024

Political discussion belongs in the "Political Discourse" subforum unless it is directly relevant to anabolic steroids and performance-enhancing drugs e.g. new AAS legislation, anti-doping laws, etc. Political discussion includes, but is not limited to, off-topic political rants, as well as partisan attacks based on Member political orientation.

Members who repeatedly disregard this guidance could be prohibited from participating in certain threads subject to the discretion of the Administration.

Political Discourse

Discuss the state of government.

thinksteroids.com

• MESO-Rx Administrator
• Replies: 0
• Forum: Principles and Frameworks

• 
• 

Floaters? Np.

Doxxing? Eh.

Members eating out of a shit source's hand? Ok.

Political discourse? Bad. Stop immediately.