Connor 25257
Member
Deca raws haven’t been very good lately, mate. Really since FebruaryI have one bad experience with them it’s the deca and of course, it’s the one raw not tested lol that’s all
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Deca raws haven’t been very good lately, mate. Really since FebruaryI have one bad experience with them it’s the deca and of course, it’s the one raw not tested lol that’s all
I have one bad experience with them it’s the deca and of course, it’s the one raw not tested lol that’s all
What’s your objective with all of this rambling about raws and quality?Deca raws haven’t been very good lately, mate. Really since February
Promotes sources and homebrews alike to pay close attention to quality of raws. Raws quality has been stagnant for now. But I’m a few months it will go back downhill. I believe China is hosting the Olympics soon. In order to stop PED use; they will be super strict. Don’t even get me started on Pandas BS “98%+ raws” really? That’s why people that had it tested came back at 95 and 96. False advertising. Their Anavar and Nandrolone came back at a pathetic 93%. I’ve tried to go back and find that where I originally saw it posted and funny enough, it’s been deleted….or so it seemsWhat’s your objective with all of this rambling about raws and quality?
Do you think no one pays attention to raws quality/purity? Even if you weren’t on this forum, testing would still be done and people would still care.Promotes sources and homebrews alike to pay close attention to quality of raws. Raws quality has been stagnant for now. But I’m a few months it will go back downhill. I believe China is hosting the Olympics soon. In order to stop PED use; they will be super strict. Don’t even get me started on Pandas BS “98%+ raws” really? That’s why people that had it tested came back at 95 and 96. False advertising. Their Anavar and Nandrolone came back at a pathetic 93%. I’ve tried to go back and find that where I originally saw it posted and funny enough, it’s been deleted….or so it seems
I think some sources care. Jet cares. Triple B did at one point, not anymore. I want to sit here and say Colonial labs cares but I think some of his tests are biased. Some labs don’t give a Jack shitDo you think no one pays attention to raws quality/purity? Even if you weren’t on this forum, testing would still be done and people would still care.
If you know jet cares, why are you bringing your preaching in here?I think some sources care. Jet cares. Triple B did at one point, not anymore. I want to sit here and say Colonial labs cares but I think some of his tests are biased. Some labs don’t give a Jack shit
I’m not preaching. I just wish sources in the United States took this approach. In this shit hole everyone orders from panda, stays on “batch 104” and claims to know what they’re doing. We already have to live under democrats *which is already bad enough *. We aren’t asking for muchIf you know jet cares, why are you bringing your preaching in here?
OkI’m not preaching. I just wish sources in the United States took this approach. In this shit hole everyone orders from panda, stays on “batch 104” and claims to know what they’re doing. We already have to live under democrats *which is already bad enough *. We aren’t asking for much
That’s basically what I was doing at this point. He certainly has a lot more time and energy to argue than I do lolJust nod your head and agree. Don't engage him and maybe he'll scurry off and start drooling all over himself in a different thread.
The amount of sample measured less than the weighted amount in comparison with a standard. You probably did HPLC and normalized the graph, which would yield different result in this case.
I do not do melting point tests.
Cheers
Really Good for generic hgh .. i like
Purity is good but the amount is 20% higher. It's not bad if they're all guaranteed to be 12iu but if inconsistent, your dosing can be quite off.