Readalots Enhanced Testing

[curveball2025]

How 'bout the people place the requirements? Moment of truth? Like water dripping on the boulder. It's here.

I can see my question will not answered. @Millard, you have both the power and integrity to make a difference.

 

[Ghoul]

I can see my question will not answered. @Millard, you have both the power and integrity to make a difference.

I'm not going to put words in his mouth, however, there's a line that mustn't be crossed by hosts of forums.

Meddling in the business practices of vendors means you're no longer the host of a social media platform, which affords a certain amount of immunity, but a participant in what the vendors are doing and risk liability.

He's never had to do it before. The community policies vendors and those who rip off customers or don't meet standards are squeezed out.

 

[curveball2025]

I'm not going to put words in his mouth, however, there's a line that mustn't be crossed by hosts of forums.

Meddling in the business practices of vendors means you're no longer the host of a social media platform, which affords a certain amount of immunity, but a participant in what the vendors are doing and risk liability.

He's never had to do it before. The community policies vendors and those who rip off customers or don't meet standards are squeezed out.

You win. Thanks.

 

[readalot]

You win. Thanks.

Once there was a fool who liked to read
Would play with himself till he shot out his seed
He would cry and just die when they paid him no heed
"But I paid for that testing" said the boy who would read
Desperate to find friends, among the MesoRx team,
To every forum he'd go, only to rant, yell and scream,
Try as he may, but all to no avail,
The people he pestered, just said "F you, go to hell."
He's sad and still whiney, about the 3k he spent,
Since it made not a difference, not a single percent,
The moral of the story, is don't be a prick,
And maybe they'll listen, and not call you a dick.

Actually, from time to time I hit the show ignored content because I have continued to be amazed that you have accomplished absolutely nothing and only continue to grow the list of people who want you to shut the hell up.

At this point in time, I do believe it will be near impossible to find many people willing to join to your fantasy quests.

As far as your girl Princess Iris, she obviously has an extensive amount of time to lurk here due to no apparent social life.

Add your lady boy loving friend from Thailand, and all I see is a trio worth a good laugh from time to time.

Keep trying with Infinity Labs and you just might start gaining traction with something.

Your projects might have credibility if your weren't the messenger.

Benefit of the doubt is given to everyone. Credibility has to be earned and can't be bought for 3k in worthless testing.

Your question to Millard doesn't seem genuine to me. Why would Millard force this testing? The would be the exact opposite of what a successful outcome would look like. Takes all the pressure off the rightful place. "Power and integrity"?

 

[curveball2025]

Your question to Millard doesn't seem genuine to me. Why would Millard force this testing? The would be the exact opposite of what a successful outcome would look like. Takes all the pressure off the rightful place. "Power and integrity"?

You win!

 

[readalot]

I can see my question will not answered

And how can you see that? You can see the future?

 

[readalot]

You win!

Very bad faith.

 

[curveball2025]

And how can you see that? You can see the future?

I was referring to you, not Millard! You attempted to answer my question with other questions.

You won! I'm done.

 

[readalot]

I was referring to you, not Millard!

You posed the question to Millard. I can't answer for him. Way to recycle Narta's trap question to Millard.

 

[readalot]

You attempted to answer my question with other questions

I never attempted to answer your question. I don't run this site. I will say I would never support the policy you asked about. I would hit the road. The would be the end of MESO. And you are intelligent enough to know that.

 

[RandallFlagg]

I can see my question will not answered. @Millard, you have both the power and integrity to make a difference.

I won't speak for Millard.

But I'm confused - was your question not answered in another post by Millard already today?

1.) This is NOT a source board. There shouldn't be a score card or "pay to play"... otherwise this becomes a source board.
- EVERYONE is free to play. That was the statement (I mean shit, I could start a UGL tomorrow and bet I could get a dumbass or two to buy from me... especially since I have some QSC primo im never going to use that I'd give away for free if it didn't count as distribution... lol)

2.) The forum users need to demand the standard.... NOT the forum owner.

3.) "Sponsors" keep the lights on. I have no clue how profitable or not that Meso is and frankly don't care. It's just not the "gotcha-moment" you think it is to ask why certain "requirements" aren't made of sources.

I actually thought Millard's post was illuminating and makes sense.

Ok, I'll break your rule and ask a question to a question....what answer are you hoping for? The answer has been given to your question already. I'm not sure what remains unclear?

 

[readalot]

The would

That [typo]

 

[readalot]

Happy New Year!

Sure. Given the current rates I'd expect a whole lot more data to go by at the end of 1Q 2025.

And as everyone told him, Everything he suggested being tested for was a non-issue, not a single test came back positive for anything across multiple vendors, forums, and individual tests. Even by a vendor who was filling his vials in the open air with not even a still air box came back clean! Kinda crazy.

@nightprowler7

That you would ignore/not acknowledge the interaction with Janoshik quoted above is just more of the same. Very disappointed in you.

Would love to hear your thoughts on a surveillance database for the UG that details failure rates on enhanced testing assays. Surely you support that. Yes?

 

[readalot]

Ok, I'll break your rule and ask a question to a question....what answer are you hoping for? The answer has been given to your question already. I'm not sure what remains unclear?

Wonder if you will get an answer?

 

[Sampei]

@nightprowler7

That you would ignore/not acknowledge the interaction with Janoshik quoted above is just more of the same. Very disappointed in you.

Would love to hear your thoughts on a surveillance database for the UG that details failure rates on enhanced testing assays. Surely you support that. Yes?

Don't waste your time with that clown

 

[curveball2025]

I won't speak for Millard.

But I'm confused - was your question not answered in another post by Millard already today?

1.) This is NOT a source board. There shouldn't be a score card or "pay to play"... otherwise this becomes a source board.
- EVERYONE is free to play. That was the statement (I mean shit, I could start a UGL tomorrow and bet I could get a dumbass or two to buy from me... especially since I have some QSC primo im never going to use that I'd give away for free if it didn't count as distribution... lol)

2.) The forum users need to demand the standard.... NOT the forum owner.

3.) "Sponsors" keep the lights on. I have no clue how profitable or not that Meso is and frankly don't care. It's just not the "gotcha-moment" you think it is to ask why certain "requirements" aren't made of sources.

I actually thought Millard's post was illuminating and makes sense.

Ok, I'll break your rule and ask a question to a question....what answer are you hoping for? The answer has been given to your question already. I'm not sure what remains unclear?

If you and your peers find that to be an acceptable answer, more power to you! As I previously said, you win! My opinion is in a minority, so it is what it is.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Wonder if you will get an answer?

And that's the thing...I don't mind if he feels differently. I'm not trying to jump down his throat (internet communication sucks sometimes...errrr, all the time).

I would humbly invite him back to clarify. It's either:
- i. his ONLY acceptable outcome is "do exactly what I propose and there is nothing to discuss."

- ii. "I didn't see Millard's recent post. Now I understand and agree."

- iii. "I saw his post and disagree with you ass clowns because....." That's where I'm left hanging.

I understand they don't owe an answer. I'm not trying to badger the witness. He actually had a sorta/kinda general question I had in my brain when Narta previously suggested kicking all sponsored sources off the board (a strange suggestion given the outcome that would leave for everyone who buys here)...but I understood the "trap" that Narta was obviously alluding to (..the elephant in the room implication being there was some bowing to sources).

I don't have a problem with the question. I have a problem with a passive aggressive agenda and instant "shut down" once they are pressed on the issue.

I will say Kudos to them for stepping away and not continuing to escalate...that part is fair if that's the choice. However, if there is more to discuss, let's say it out loud...in a "moving the message forward" kinda way...and I guess maybe he's looking for an answer directly from Millard so this novella is not what they requested. To quote Dirt (without permission) - Peace.

 

[readalot]

And that's the thing...I don't mind if he feels differently. I'm not trying to jump down his throat (internet communication sucks sometimes...errrr, all the time).

I would humbly invite him back to clarify. It's either:
- i. his ONLY acceptable outcome is "do exactly what I propose and there is nothing to discuss."

- ii. "I didn't see Millard's recent post. Now I understand and agree."

- iii. "I saw his post and disagree with you ass clowns because....." That's where I'm left hanging.

I understand they don't owe an answer. I'm not trying to badger the witness. He actually had a sorta/kinda general question I had in my brain when Narta previously suggested kicking all sponsored sources off the board (a strange suggestion given the outcome that would leave for everyone who buys here)...but I understood the "trap" that Narta was obviously alluding to (..the elephant in the room implication being there was some bowing to sources).

I don't have a problem with the question. I have a problem with a passive aggressive agenda and instant "shut down" once they are pressed on the issue.

I will say Kudos to them for stepping away and not continuing to escalate...that part is fair if that's the choice. However, if there is more to discuss, let's say it out loud...in a "moving the message forward" kinda way...and I guess maybe he's looking for an answer directly from Millard so this novella is not what they requested. To quote Dirt (without permission) - Peace.

That would all assume Good Faith. I admire your Good Faith. Thank you. It gives me hope and bolsters my inner strength.

 

[RandallFlagg]

If you and your peers find that to be an acceptable answer, more power to you! As I previously said, you win! My opinion is in a minority, so it is what it is.

You're vocal minority in this thread.

There are obviously others that feel the way you do that either a. Left the site, or b. Don't want to be bothered with Internet scuffles.

I'm genuinely not trying to "win" or kick you out of the discussion. I'm just trying to understand what remains unclear.

Is the only acceptable outcome in your mind what you proposed?

 

[B Ware]

Definitely not opposed to more testing but this is a hard sale when the results have consistently been the same and may always be. It also runs what, $500ish per sample compared to the $125 every vendor pays now for hplc? The big elephant in the room is the timing. I assume everyone is aware of what is happening in China with the manufacturing of everything? Prices are already about to hike as what these UGLs currently have is pretty much all that is out there.