Scammer : GDRoids aka Legal Steroids

[BigTomJ]

Agree with they should post janoshik results but its not a fact that it is shilling if they don't post janoshik results.

That is your opinion. You don't know a poster's intentions no matter how much you think you are the one to judge their intentions.

went right over your head.

Its okay, youll catch on eventually.

Any and all promotion or praise of a source, that does not include objective metrics such as testing, should be received as shilling.

An unknown members "xyz is legit" holds absolutely zero value and carries no credibility, these types of statements should never be taken at face value by any readers and should always be written off as a shill review.

 

[MackVMT]

went right over your head.

Its okay, youll catch on eventually.

Any and all promotion or praise of a source, that does not include objective metrics such as testing, should be received as shilling.

An unknown members "xyz is legit" holds absolutely zero value and carries no credibility, these types of statements should never be taken at face value by any readers and should always be written off as a shill review.

nothing went over my head. I see you have changed your wording now though.

It would seem that you agree your previous statement of 'fact' is actually your opinion. You have a great day.

 

[bigMoJo]

Agree with they should post janoshik results but its not a fact that it is shilling if they don't post janoshik results.

That is your opinion. You don't know a poster's intentions no matter how much you think you are the one to judge their intentions.

Bro, I think you are right... there is no way to know the poster's intentions... at this point. There was no direct accusation of such. Although, there is a need to point it out... call it out... let all members understand our common standards, right?

ISAP is not on this site and they have lots of testing on their site to show. Not sure if we can post to outside sources, or I would

Bro, I don't think you meant anything maliciously, we are just "calling you out."

There's more to it than just this, but it's best not to post links to another AAS forum from this one unless you absolutely know it's ok and what it's for. One of the reasons being, if you start introducing "outside" vendors, and something goes wrong, YOU will be blamed, along with the rest of us for allowing an "un-vetted," "outside" source exposure on this forum "un-checked." The sources on this forum have gone through a process where members "grill" ("vet") them before their business takes off. We, as a community, hold the sources accountable.

Probably best to not do it in this forum. It seems you know OPs history so who knows but I can see where others are skeptical of your posts.

I think you're right again. RebelScum can blast away, along with OP. But again, it's going to be "called-out." The discussion is healthy. However, leading, or mis-leading rather, about an "un-vetted" source and it's "reliability" and/or "quality" maybe in issue with broader implications.

 

[MackVMT]

Bro, I think you are right... there is no way to know the poster's intentions... at this point. There was no direct accusation of such. Although, there is a need to point it out... call it out... let all members understand our common standards, right?


Bro, I don't think you meant anything maliciously, we are just "calling you out."

There's more to it than just this, but it's best not to post links to another AAS forum from this one unless you absolutely know it's ok and what it's for. One of the reasons being, if you start introducing "outside" vendors, and something goes wrong, YOU will be blamed, along with the rest of us for allowing an "un-vetted," "outside" source exposure on this forum "un-checked." The sources on this forum have gone through a process where members "grill" ("vet") them before their business takes off. We, as a community, hold the sources accountable.


I think you're right again. RebelScum can blast away, along with OP. But again, it's going to be "called-out." The discussion is healthy. However, leading, or mis-leading rather, about an "un-vetted" source and it's "reliability" and/or "quality" maybe in issue with broader implications.

I don't have the option to 'like' your post in this subforum, but yes, I see your points regarding the standards of this forum and I agree with you.