Second Cycle

PalmerT

New Member
Did my first cycle back in 2011-2012 (Got my gear from O before he got shut down.)

I was running:
1-10 Test C 500mg/week but only injecting once per week
1-8 Deca 200mg per week
1-4 DBol 20mg/day
1-10 arimidex .5mg/day

I didn't put as much research into that cycle as I should have, and really didn't get the gains I was hoping for. Well I am ready to start another cycle. Right now, I am 185lbs at 5'10, 10% BF. I am eating 3100 calories a day, but plan on kicking it up to 3600-3700 when on cycle.

My planned cycle is as follows.
1-14 Sustanon 250mg twice per week
1-12 Equipoise 200mg twice per week (I did not respond well to the deca)
1-12 HCG 500iu EOD
arimidex only as needed.

I'll be using standard PCT, with HCG included in that as well.
 
What class of AAS are included in any given cycle should be based upon specific and easily defined goals. So desired outcomes such as "I want to cut or bulk up" or "I wanna be a lean fat burning machine" are destined for failure, IME

However comments such as I want to improve my LMB from 12 to 10% is readily defined and evaluated using existing technology which is reproducible for comparative analysis and/or future use.

Moreover I've no idea what your first cycle goals were but considering the AAS used, either the your expectations were unreasonable, the anabolics (at least some of them) were subpar, or some combination of the two are responsible for not achieving the desired outcome.

jimmy
 
What class of AAS are included in any given cycle should be based upon specific and easily defined goals. So desired outcomes such as "I want to cut or bulk up" or "I wanna be a lean fat burning machine" are destined for failure, IME

However comments such as I want to improve my LMB from 12 to 10% is readily defined and evaluated using existing technology which is reproducible for comparative analysis and/or future use.

Moreover I've no idea what your first cycle goals were but considering the AAS used, either the your expectations were unreasonable, the anabolics (at least some of them) were subpar, or some combination of the two are responsible for not achieving the desired outcome.

jimmy

Thanks for the advice man. Right now, I sit at 166 LBM. I would like to get up to 180 LBM after PCT and everything. Also, I'd like to get back up to a 500lb deadlift. I was able to do that after my last cycle and maintain it for a few months, but then I herniated a disk. I was out of squatting and deadlifting for a while, so my lifts in that dropped significantly. I have been able to get back into it the past few months, and I have worked my way up to 405.

As far as my last cycle, I think it was a combination of not having any real goals and being inconsistent with my working out/diet. Also, I fell behind on my PCT and was inconsistent with that as well. I lost a lot of my initial gains.
 
it doesnt matter now......that window of opputunity is closed....lol...where to people get this shit from???
 
I was thinking about Biologic. They've seemed a bit inconsistent recently though from what I've read.

Well this is the first I have ever heard/read this. Can you provide a source of where you got this information?
 
Sorry I just disappeared, had some stuff going on. As for where I read that, I was reading through the BioLogic thread on here. Don't get me wrong, I have read a lot more good than bad, but there are always people who have negative things to say. Sorry, I didn't mean for it to come off like that, though. I was just saying that I wasn't sure of which lab I was going with, but was considering BioLogic.
 
Back
Top