Sigma Audley Inc. - Your source for peptides, ancillaries, AAS, and more!

[Dirthand]

I also need to report my experience with SSA.


I placed an order on January 8th to the EU via a special line. It's important to note that these were oils and orals, not peptides. Unfortunately, they couldn't send the package before the Chinese New Year, even though they promised it would be sent. This frustrated me, as it was my first order with them, and one month passed without them even shipping the package.


After the Chinese New Year, on February 9th, SSA finally managed to send the package. After patiently waiting for another month (beginning of March), with no updates on the tracking, my rep informed me that the package was being inspected by customs. My rep told me that a reshipment would be arranged, although they didn’t have a compound in stock (Primo) so I added a bunch of other items.


I waited more than a week, checking in every two days about the reshipment, but all I got was that "it has been arranged." At this point, I thought it was over, I was running out of gear, and I would never receive anything from them (keep in mind, I had already been waiting for almost two and a half months). So, I ordered from a domestic EU seller.


Just a week after that, I received the domestic shipment, and suddenly the original shipment from SSA started to move. I immediately emailed my rep to cancel the reshipment (I had been waiting for the reshipment tracking number for roughly two weeks at this point), but it was too late. Three days later, I received the tracking number for the reshipment — the day after my original package arrived.


The original package was missing one item ($17 worth, which I didn’t care much about), and SSA sent an email saying I needed to reimburse them for the reshipment. The reshipment didn’t include Primobolan since they were out of stock, so I added other items instead. Now, I have way too much gear, and with the reshipment, I’ll have even more unwanted items.


We had a bit of a heated conversation because I tried to stop the reshipment I had been waiting on for almost two weeks. I'm not exactly a happy customer, receiving my package almost three months after payment, and now they want me to pay for the reshipment as well, which I didn’t want.


We eventually reached an agreement: I would pay 50% of the reshipment cost when it arrives. I think this is the fairest option, all things considered. Why?


From SSA's perspective:

• If the original shipment had been seized, I wouldn’t have to pay at all, meaning they would lose 100% of the price. With two packages sent, one lost, they would have 100% of the price instead of 200%.
• Since the original shipment wasn’t seized, and if the reshipment arrives, they sent two packages, neither lost, but they only received 100% of the price instead of 200%. This is not fair!

From my perspective:

• If the original shipment had been seized, I would have only one package, not two. So for 100% payment, I would have received only one package.
• Since the original shipment wasn’t seized, and if the reshipment arrives, I will have two packages, but I only paid 100%? This is also not fair!

So, I concluded that if I pay 50% of the reshipment cost (if it arrives), they will have sent two packages and received 150% of the price, so they are 50% up. If the reshipment arrives, I will have two packages and pay 150% of the price instead of 200%.


This way, both of us are happy. SSA doesn’t lose 100%, only 50% (meaning they didn’t make a profit on the reshipment), and I get a 25% discount on both packages for the long delivery time and the frustration.


All things considered, I think this is the fairest and most reasonable outcome, and I recommend anyone in the same situation to do the same.


I’ve read other comments where people refuse to pay for the reshipment at all. I think that’s a "gypsy mentality" and I’m not having it.


By doing this, you collect bad karma, the rep will blacklist you, and you make it harder for the rep to trust others to make reshipments in the future, which only makes things worse.
But if you do the right thing, you collect good karma, the rep will trust you, and they’ll be more likely to trust others with reshipments too — making things better for everyone.


As an added bonus, I'll receive a 4% additional discount on my next order with them, which will be a peptide order.

Dam dawg... did you do a hot rail or something this morning???

 

[bbingislife1234]

I also need to report my experience with SSA.


I placed an order on January 8th to the EU via a special line. It's important to note that these were oils and orals, not peptides. Unfortunately, they couldn't send the package before the Chinese New Year, even though they promised it would be sent. This frustrated me, as it was my first order with them, and one month passed without them even shipping the package.


After the Chinese New Year, on February 9th, SSA finally managed to send the package. After patiently waiting for another month (beginning of March), with no updates on the tracking, my rep informed me that the package was being inspected by customs. My rep told me that a reshipment would be arranged, although they didn’t have a compound in stock (Primo) so I added a bunch of other items.


I waited more than a week, checking in every two days about the reshipment, but all I got was that "it has been arranged." At this point, I thought it was over, I was running out of gear, and I would never receive anything from them (keep in mind, I had already been waiting for almost two and a half months). So, I ordered from a domestic EU seller.


Just a week after that, I received the domestic shipment, and suddenly the original shipment from SSA started to move. I immediately emailed my rep to cancel the reshipment (I had been waiting for the reshipment tracking number for roughly two weeks at this point), but it was too late. Three days later, I received the tracking number for the reshipment — the day after my original package arrived.


The original package was missing one item ($17 worth, which I didn’t care much about), and SSA sent an email saying I needed to reimburse them for the reshipment. The reshipment didn’t include Primobolan since they were out of stock, so I added other items instead. Now, I have way too much gear, and with the reshipment, I’ll have even more unwanted items.


We had a bit of a heated conversation because I tried to stop the reshipment I had been waiting on for almost two weeks. I'm not exactly a happy customer, receiving my package almost three months after payment, and now they want me to pay for the reshipment as well, which I didn’t want.


We eventually reached an agreement: I would pay 50% of the reshipment cost when it arrives. I think this is the fairest option, all things considered. Why?


From SSA's perspective:

• If the original shipment had been seized, I wouldn’t have to pay at all, meaning they would lose 100% of the price. With two packages sent, one lost, they would have 100% of the price instead of 200%.
• Since the original shipment wasn’t seized, and if the reshipment arrives, they sent two packages, neither lost, but they only received 100% of the price instead of 200%. This is not fair!

From my perspective:

• If the original shipment had been seized, I would have only one package, not two. So for 100% payment, I would have received only one package.
• Since the original shipment wasn’t seized, and if the reshipment arrives, I will have two packages, but I only paid 100%? This is also not fair!

So, I concluded that if I pay 50% of the reshipment cost (if it arrives), they will have sent two packages and received 150% of the price, so they are 50% up. If the reshipment arrives, I will have two packages and pay 150% of the price instead of 200%.


This way, both of us are happy. SSA doesn’t lose 100%, only 50% (meaning they didn’t make a profit on the reshipment), and I get a 25% discount on both packages for the long delivery time and the frustration.


All things considered, I think this is the fairest and most reasonable outcome, and I recommend anyone in the same situation to do the same.


I’ve read other comments where people refuse to pay for the reshipment at all. I think that’s a "gypsy mentality" and I’m not having it.


By doing this, you collect bad karma, the rep will blacklist you, and you make it harder for the rep to trust others to make reshipments in the future, which only makes things worse.
But if you do the right thing, you collect good karma, the rep will trust you, and they’ll be more likely to trust others with reshipments too — making things better for everyone.


As an added bonus, I'll receive a 4% additional discount on my next order with them, which will be a peptide order.

tbh this give me more trust in this source to see how they handle this kind of situations.

 

[Stealth500]

I also need to report my experience with SSA.


I placed an order on January 8th to the EU via a special line. It's important to note that these were oils and orals, not peptides. Unfortunately, they couldn't send the package before the Chinese New Year, even though they promised it would be sent. This frustrated me, as it was my first order with them, and one month passed without them even shipping the package.


After the Chinese New Year, on February 9th, SSA finally managed to send the package. After patiently waiting for another month (beginning of March), with no updates on the tracking, my rep informed me that the package was being inspected by customs. My rep told me that a reshipment would be arranged, although they didn’t have a compound in stock (Primo) so I added a bunch of other items.


I waited more than a week, checking in every two days about the reshipment, but all I got was that "it has been arranged." At this point, I thought it was over, I was running out of gear, and I would never receive anything from them (keep in mind, I had already been waiting for almost two and a half months). So, I ordered from a domestic EU seller.


Just a week after that, I received the domestic shipment, and suddenly the original shipment from SSA started to move. I immediately emailed my rep to cancel the reshipment (I had been waiting for the reshipment tracking number for roughly two weeks at this point), but it was too late. Three days later, I received the tracking number for the reshipment — the day after my original package arrived.


The original package was missing one item ($17 worth, which I didn’t care much about), and SSA sent an email saying I needed to reimburse them for the reshipment. The reshipment didn’t include Primobolan since they were out of stock, so I added other items instead. Now, I have way too much gear, and with the reshipment, I’ll have even more unwanted items.


We had a bit of a heated conversation because I tried to stop the reshipment I had been waiting on for almost two weeks. I'm not exactly a happy customer, receiving my package almost three months after payment, and now they want me to pay for the reshipment as well, which I didn’t want.


We eventually reached an agreement: I would pay 50% of the reshipment cost when it arrives. I think this is the fairest option, all things considered. Why?


From SSA's perspective:

• If the original shipment had been seized, I wouldn’t have to pay at all, meaning they would lose 100% of the price. With two packages sent, one lost, they would have 100% of the price instead of 200%.
• Since the original shipment wasn’t seized, and if the reshipment arrives, they sent two packages, neither lost, but they only received 100% of the price instead of 200%. This is not fair!

From my perspective:

• If the original shipment had been seized, I would have only one package, not two. So for 100% payment, I would have received only one package.
• Since the original shipment wasn’t seized, and if the reshipment arrives, I will have two packages, but I only paid 100%? This is also not fair!

So, I concluded that if I pay 50% of the reshipment cost (if it arrives), they will have sent two packages and received 150% of the price, so they are 50% up. If the reshipment arrives, I will have two packages and pay 150% of the price instead of 200%.


This way, both of us are happy. SSA doesn’t lose 100%, only 50% (meaning they didn’t make a profit on the reshipment), and I get a 25% discount on both packages for the long delivery time and the frustration.


All things considered, I think this is the fairest and most reasonable outcome, and I recommend anyone in the same situation to do the same.


I’ve read other comments where people refuse to pay for the reshipment at all. I think that’s a "gypsy mentality" and I’m not having it.


By doing this, you collect bad karma, the rep will blacklist you, and you make it harder for the rep to trust others to make reshipments in the future, which only makes things worse.
But if you do the right thing, you collect good karma, the rep will trust you, and they’ll be more likely to trust others with reshipments too — making things better for everyone.


As an added bonus, I'll receive a 4% additional discount on my next order with them, which will be a peptide order.

good on you.

 

[BP_6]

Any rough ETA on when the US warehouse might be stocked again with Triz/Reta?

 

[ovrdooze]

I think that’s a "gypsy mentality" and I’m not having it.

tell me you're eastern European without telling me you're from eastern Europe
Hungary, Romania or Slovakia are my guesses

 

[CharlesV]

Retatrutide 50mg Is there any demand? If there is demand, I will arrange production.

yes. but Sampei is correct that 60 would be better.

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

Your previously unsent test results are now available:

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

Janoshik Analytical

 

[Luka.Halotestin]

My package got held up by customs because SSA's carriers didn't declare the value of the package even though I told them to declare some value on it to pass the customs easier.

It was a simple instruction and yet they failed to implement it. Now I lose 500 usd worth of goods because of that.

 

[Dirthand]

I feel like Ray has been mean to my rep.
@SigmaAudley China Peptide you need to be nice to your employees. Maybe a little bonus!!!

 

[BamaCrazy]

My package got held up by customs because SSA's carriers didn't declare the value of the package even though I told them to declare some value on it to pass the customs easier.

It was a simple instruction and yet they failed to implement it. Now I lose 500 usd worth of goods because of that.

They better make this right. @SigmaAudley China Peptide

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

Please tell me your tracking number for me to check

My package got held up by customs because SSA's carriers didn't declare the value of the package even though I told them to declare some value on it to pass the customs easier.

It was a simple instruction and yet they failed to implement it. Now I lose 500 usd worth of goods because of that.

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

lipo-B ：Janoshik Analytical

 

[Dirthand]

lipo-B ：Janoshik Analytical

That is a horrible amount of Benzyl alcohol? Can you explain your thoughts on this test? Also why is your engineer using Cyanocobalamin instead of Methylcobalamin?
@SigmaAudley China Peptide

 

[Dirthand]

lipo-B ：Janoshik Analytical

Can you post the whole test Instead of this half ass bullshit. .Are you trying to say this is a good test with 30%alcohol and the wrong type of b12?? Don't just post something to lead unexperienced people on. Speak!!!

 

[vapor77]

Can you post the whole test Instead of this half ass bullshit. .

This is getting more and more common and its annoying.

Asked for a price list from a few vendors and I get mobile screen shots as a response and not even cropped.

 

[Dirthand]

lipo-B ：Janoshik Analytical

@SigmaAudley China Peptide this should only have 1.5% Benzyl alcohol.. why is there 30%. What was your reason for posting this test? So the people that purchased it to offer refunds???

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

@SigmaAudley China Peptide this should only have 1.5% Benzyl alcohol.. why is there 30%. What was your reason for posting this test? So the people that purchased it to offer refunds???

First of all, this is the latest sample of lipo-b. We have adjusted the raw material supplier and have not sold it to the outside.

 

[SigmaAudley China Peptide]

Any rough ETA on when the US warehouse might be stocked again with Triz/Reta?

Expected to arrive within a week

 

[Sampei]

Can you post the whole test Instead of this half ass bullshit. .Are you trying to say this is a good test with 30%alcohol and the wrong type of b12?? Don't just post something to lead unexperienced people on. Speak!!!

It's not the wrong type of b12, that b12 can be used too. They are both ok

 

[Sampei]

Is there a second of all?? No answer to the question of why the 39% Benzyl alcohol and the use of Cyanocobalamin. And why did you even post the test?

I guess he wanted feedback if it was ok or not this kind of lipoB. Chill brother you are a bit aggressive this morning xD