Social Security Institute | Smackdown of Obama by Supreme Court may be inevitable
Anyone who understands the origins of the constitution and the admission by the anti-federalists in their writings that they lost the case for a strong central government will realize that through nefarious interpretations by the Supreme Court over the last two centuries of the General Welfare Clause, the Commerce Clause, and the Supremacy Clause the federal government has overstepped its bounds to the point where a small island off the coast of France has been replaced by a small city called DC. That sovereignty in Britain lay in the hands of the few - Parliament - was not lost on our Founders. Neither was the consequences this lead to. That the constitution was ratified not by by popular referendum but by 13 sovereign states in Constitutional Conventions tells anyone what the Founder's thought of state power. Most people never heart of the Principles of '98 and the use of nullification - where a state is the real final check on the constitutionality of a law and not the Supreme court. That Jefferson and Madison lead the charge in '98 is also now widely known. That nullification was used to mute the Fugitive Slave Acts is also not widely known.
What is widely - and incorrectly - believed is the meme of federal supremacy. This is beginning to change. With the arrival of Tom Woods book Nullification - How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century, many in America are beginning to wake up. It is the states and the people who give power to the government, not the other way around. If the SCOTUS uses the Commerce Clause to allow the government to force you to buy something in the name of INTERSTATE COMMERCE, their power will be unlimited. Under this ruling, the Congress could then force you to buy a new car to spur economic growth. The SCOTUS is ready to put Obama in his place. Its about time.
As Jefferson noted, in a dispute between a state and the federal government the final arbiter was never meant to be the federal government. Such a conclusion is absurd on its face. It would be like you and I disagreeing on some topic followed by my insistence that my mother arbitrate the dispute.
Next stop will be to put the SCOTUS in its proper place. Look for nullification to become a household word. Read more about nullification and other topics at Wolves of Liberty | Tearing Apart Liberty\\\'s Barriers To Get To Juicy Meat of Freedom. Also check out Tenth Amendment Center.
The pushback begins.
Anyone who understands the origins of the constitution and the admission by the anti-federalists in their writings that they lost the case for a strong central government will realize that through nefarious interpretations by the Supreme Court over the last two centuries of the General Welfare Clause, the Commerce Clause, and the Supremacy Clause the federal government has overstepped its bounds to the point where a small island off the coast of France has been replaced by a small city called DC. That sovereignty in Britain lay in the hands of the few - Parliament - was not lost on our Founders. Neither was the consequences this lead to. That the constitution was ratified not by by popular referendum but by 13 sovereign states in Constitutional Conventions tells anyone what the Founder's thought of state power. Most people never heart of the Principles of '98 and the use of nullification - where a state is the real final check on the constitutionality of a law and not the Supreme court. That Jefferson and Madison lead the charge in '98 is also now widely known. That nullification was used to mute the Fugitive Slave Acts is also not widely known.
What is widely - and incorrectly - believed is the meme of federal supremacy. This is beginning to change. With the arrival of Tom Woods book Nullification - How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century, many in America are beginning to wake up. It is the states and the people who give power to the government, not the other way around. If the SCOTUS uses the Commerce Clause to allow the government to force you to buy something in the name of INTERSTATE COMMERCE, their power will be unlimited. Under this ruling, the Congress could then force you to buy a new car to spur economic growth. The SCOTUS is ready to put Obama in his place. Its about time.
As Jefferson noted, in a dispute between a state and the federal government the final arbiter was never meant to be the federal government. Such a conclusion is absurd on its face. It would be like you and I disagreeing on some topic followed by my insistence that my mother arbitrate the dispute.
Next stop will be to put the SCOTUS in its proper place. Look for nullification to become a household word. Read more about nullification and other topics at Wolves of Liberty | Tearing Apart Liberty\\\'s Barriers To Get To Juicy Meat of Freedom. Also check out Tenth Amendment Center.
The pushback begins.
