scott weiland
New Member
I think this thread should be deleted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So tell us then, what are your thoughts about Sciroxx being busted, a whole bunch of people in RI being charged ( including cops ), and the Israelis co-operating with the investigation?
Do you think that your customers should be concerned?
Are you concerned?
Are your payment options "safe"?
Is there anything that we should know about?
Kamala, how many customers have been prosecuted from three of the largest busts in recent memory? It seems like people are suggesting that SCIROXX is on the brink of disaster, and customers shouldn't order from any reseller(although the topic is only being posted in the SF thread). So, as history is the best indicator when predicting the future. How many guys were busted for ordering 2-3 cycles/ year (average for any regular user) from the following recently busted sources?
Axio/GenXXL
MuscleBear
UncleZ
I have asked this question several times and am always answered with silence. It is a genuine question, not a rhetorical or argumentative one. I personally didn't hear of any, customers being busted. But I have shown in this thread through my "ridiculous" questions, that I clearly don't know everything.
Do, I think customers should be concerned?
--I am both a customer of SF and the SF rep. I think people who break the law should always be concerned, that concern/fear makes you careful. I do not believe the bust of the RI remailers will have ANY EFFECT on an SF customer.
Am I concerned?
--After doing time myself, I am concerned yes. Concerned for the men who are going to jail over attempting to distribute steroids. Concerned for their families, and the families of those they snitched on for a lighter sentence. Concerned for Karl. Not concerned the government is going to come after myself or any of the several friends both online and in real life, who I have referred to SF.
Are our payment options safe?
--This question has been hashed and rehashed. There is no such thing as a safe payment method. No such thing as a safe way to break the law. Even with a fake name at WU/MG. Which Millard has already pointed out is far from fool proof. We offer the industry standard for payment methods. WU/MG payments are the forms I personally believe to be the MOST SAFE. Not SAFE in the sense that nothing can go wrong, but a method every vet on this forum has used. And most likely, will continue to use.
Kamala, how many customers have been prosecuted from three of the largest busts in recent memory? It seems like people are suggesting that SCIROXX is on the brink of disaster, and customers shouldn't order from any reseller(although the topic is only being posted in the SF thread). So, as history is the best indicator when predicting the future. How many guys were busted for ordering 2-3 cycles/ year (average for any regular user) from the following recently busted sources?
Axio/GenXXL
MuscleBear
UncleZ
I have asked this question several times and am always answered with silence. It is a genuine question, not a rhetorical or argumentative one. I personally didn't hear of any, customers being busted. But I have shown in this thread through my "ridiculous" questions, that I clearly don't know everything.
Well we all know sciroxx likes safe mail (dumb)
bobsmith@yahoo.com
No silence here, in the crown drugs case a lot of customers were hit after the feds kept the site up and kept taking orders..... Its just a matter of time until it happens again.
1 more question before I leave this thread, how many people on this forum have multiple accounts and work for your company? Its just a question, I'm not implying anything or attacking....... Its just a question.
what is the preferred anonymous mail sevice? why is safe mail not an acceptable service? i know very little about all this and this seems like important info to get out there. obviously i wouldnt use my actual email,seems like a bad idea, so what to use????Code:bobsmith@yahoo.com
Perhaps it's best to simplify the issue.
Although it may "not matter" as a consumer I would rather NOT be even remotely associated with the "illegal activities" of a company involved in an ongoing federal investigation!
Although some may call that suggestion "paranoia" I call it a "no brainer"!
Jim
Paranoia in this business is a good thing. No chlorpromazine needed.
If people choose to order online, they must first learn to completely isolate their online identity from their real one. That would be a great topic for someone that has the know-how to write an article about.
There are only 2 people on this forum who have ever received a freebie from SF.
Myself and Sworder.
Sworder is no longer working with us. Not because he did anything wrong, simply because we decided to move in another direction.
So that leaves me. I am the only SF employee on this site. 100% of the reviews left here, are authentic. No one else who speaks positively of SF does so for any ulterior motive.
Hard to believe with the constant echoing of positivity eh? I thought the same thing before taking over the REP account.
This is why I'm a big advocate of multiple identities for anonymity. I'd take it a step further and say it's not enough to separate your online identity from your real one. But you need to separate an identity for each and every transaction/vendor.
IF your online forum identity has 2,344 posts on 12 different forums, that's quite an extensive digital trail that could have an unnerving amount of identifying information. Why would you want to use that online identity to place an order?
I know there are good reasons - like getting good discounts, freebies because you can prove you're a vet with clout - but this has nothing to do with anonymity and safety.
If people choose to order online, they must first learn to completely isolate their online identity from their real one.