[Superior Labs] [Test E Bloods]

[Spike Man]

I don't think I took it out of context, I think you over stated. Can you show me the other threads about his prop? I have only seen the one. Thanks!

I never said you took it out of context, but you are over analyzing the post I made. I simply spoke what I read and I even added a little note saying that the information I had read was from a few threads here on Meso. Also, I said there were MANY good reviews, but only a few negative. I also mentioned that EVERY source you run into will have SOME kind of negative feedback, that is just the name of the game. The moral of my post here is that what I say should hold no water in what your final decision should be about a product. You obviously favor this guy quite a bit from all of the responses you have posted about what you have ran and what you are going to run in the future, which is just fine. I told you I was planning on running his Test, which would imply that I trust in this source enough to send my money in expectation of returned goods.

If you feel the need to read every bad review about Superior Labs, then be my guest, but I don't have the extra time to waste to satisfy another person by ravaging through my thread history for a few posts that obviously have no merit.

If you want me to tell you how I feel about Superior Labs, well, my research shows they have pretty reliable gear. Is that sufficient?

 

[4leafclover]

I never said you took it out of context, but you are over analyzing the post I made. I simply spoke what I read and I even added a little note saying that the information I had read was from a few threads here on Meso. Also, I said there were MANY good reviews, but only a few negative. I also mentioned that EVERY source you run into will have SOME kind of negative feedback, that is just the name of the game. The moral of my post here is that what I say should hold no water in what your final decision should be about a product. You obviously favor this guy quite a bit from all of the responses you have posted about what you have ran and what you are going to run in the future, which is just fine. I told you I was planning on running his Test, which would imply that I trust in this source enough to send my money in expectation of returned goods.

If you feel the need to read every bad review about Superior Labs, then be my guest, but I don't have the extra time to waste to satisfy another person by ravaging through my thread history for a few posts that obviously have no merit.

If you want me to tell you how I feel about Superior Labs, well, my research shows they have pretty reliable gear. Is that sufficient?

Here is what you said.

"I have heard many positive/negative reviews about both labs, but to be quite honest it is not uncommon I suppose.

Superior is someone I have been looking into quite often as of lately. They have some negative reputation points in my book, but then again they have some nice positive tests to kind of reenforce my decision to keep up tabs on them."


All I was asking is that if you are going to throw around words like many positive and negative reviews, having negative reputation points, that you link those. To which you replied

"If you feel the need to read every bad review about Superior Labs, then be my guest, but I don't have the extra time to waste to satisfy another person by ravaging through my thread history for a few posts that obviously have no merit."

I don't want to read every negative review, but if I am going to say that they have "many" bad reviews, and a member of this community asks me for proof, I am going to post it.

I post my experiences with superior, because I want members to know what those are. I have shared both positive and negative reviews of many sources on this board, superior has just been one that has come up quite a bit in various threads over the last month or so.

 

[Spike Man]

Here is what you said.

"I have heard many positive/negative reviews about both labs, but to be quite honest it is not uncommon I suppose.

Superior is someone I have been looking into quite often as of lately. They have some negative reputation points in my book, but then again they have some nice positive tests to kind of reenforce my decision to keep up tabs on them."


All I was asking is that if you are going to throw around words like many positive and negative reviews, having negative reputation points, that you link those. To which you replied

"If you feel the need to read every bad review about Superior Labs, then be my guest, but I don't have the extra time to waste to satisfy another person by ravaging through my thread history for a few posts that obviously have no merit."

I don't want to read every negative review, but if I am going to say that they have "many" bad reviews, and a member of this community asks me for proof, I am going to post it.

I post my experiences with superior, because I want members to know what those are. I have shared both positive and negative reviews of many sources on this board, superior has just been one that has come up quite a bit in various threads over the last month or so.

Hmm, I see where the problem is, now. I read things differently than you do. My post made perfect sense to me, but I guess it threw you for a spin. The reason I do refuse to go back and cite every bad thing I have read about Superior is because just in my first two days on this board I easily spent around 5-7 hours continually reading about sources, labs, general discussion, etc... and honestly I don't recall every place I read. The beautiful thing about the mind is it has an amazing ability to store the information you are looking for and it allows me to think back and make a decision. In this case, I am convinced the good outweighs the bad. Please don't mistake my word choice of "bad review" to mean something on an extreme end of the negative spectrum. The word merely reflects anything that I read that wasn't a positive feedback post. Such as bad t/a or communication or gear. I just wanted to clear that up before I left this thread.

It is quite laughable to think this was drawn out so long.

 

[4leafclover]

Yeah, the internet can be a fucked up place in terms of interpreting! I hope I wasn't being a dick because that wasn't my intention. I'm a tad bit jumpy when it comes to superior at the moment, only because I will be investing a large chunk of change coming up pretty soon and if they turn sour, I don't want to sink my comp cycle on their goods. As I will be doing a show (hopefully in both 2015 and 2016), so the need for both of my upcoming cycles to be on point is required!

 

[zthrill]

There was only the one person complaint about the prop (and now Sust?) From my experience and a few others I know have said his dbol is pretty weak and his tren a is probably underdosed. His deca and test e seem to be great to me.

 

[Kobe Beef]

I just pulled the trigger with Superior and got some Dbol Test E Tren E and eq on the way.... hopefully the Dbol is not weak and the Tren isnt underdosed... but only time will tell.. its the risk you take with Ugl... allll part of the game.

 

[Manny]

I added prop to my cycle and can't say for sure, labs that it's good but if I'm not taking my anastrozol I'm getting tits! ; ) I'm going to say that it's good.

 

[dper726]

He is the only one that said a relatively low test level but expectations here and according to Dr Scally test levels should be 8-10x which mine fits perfectly with. The person you mentioned at "2900" was only 18 off from 3000. His results could be based on other factors such as, time before pinned, natty t levels, height/weight, etc. Others said superior is g2g etc so I dont know where you are getting at with my numbers being too high or whatever. Regardless like I said @Capt Forest labcorp is the only lab the reads a false positive with deca. Read my reddit page and it will tell you why. Find me a labsmd/privatelabsmd with a false positive and I'll gladly change my opinion about my test levels.

can you link us to that research of yours explaining how labcorp yields a false positive with deca? I am interested as i had recent bloods posted which according to members was already under dosed in relationship to the weekly dosage administration. Also including the fact deca is in the mix.

 

[Manny]

I have a question. I'm getting paralizing muscle cramps and spasms. Im on tren, test sust, bold and prop. Huckingfuge told me to drink lots o# water which I am. Also, to get taurine. Now my question is this, could there be dbol or something else in my gear? Thx. By the way, the prop that I have is from superior. The reason I asked here was the comments aboit deca, false positive. Thx guy

 

[Marcus]

I have a question. I'm getting paralizing muscle cramps and spasms. Im on tren, test sust, bold and prop. Huckingfuge told me to drink lots o# water which I am. Also, to get taurine. Now my question is this, could there be dbol or something else in my gear? Thx. By the way, the prop that I have is from superior. The reason I asked here was the comments aboit deca, false positive. Thx guy

The taurine should help, take a lot to start and see if it works. 4-5 grams twice a day.
Why would deca showing as a false positive for test results be any reason to post about cramps?

 

[Manny]

The taurine should help, take a lot to start and see if it works. 4-5 grams twice a day.
Why would deca showing as a false positive for test results be any reason to post about cramps?

It made me thinm about it. I was running dbol but cut it out due to my appetite being shit. Hopefully at the end of my run ill be able to add it back in.

 

[Ripp]

Thanks for the post zthrill.