Systematic Review: treatment for low testosterone

I wouldn't put much weight on this. First author is an md/mph student and the last author has only written many articles- always anti-testosterone. This was meant to have this conclusion. Or, the article was cherry picked and fixed. No one who wrote it has any academic standing. And notice, the first and last author are both women. I see an agenda... I guess i will have some homework in reading this further. However, I think many people will agree here- supraphysiological levels are beneficial, mostly.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't put much weight on this. First author is an md/mph student and the last author has only written many articles- always anti-testosterone. This was meant to have this conclusion. Or, the article was cherry picked and fixed. No one who wrote it has any academic standing. And notice, the first and last author are both women. I see an agenda... I guess i will have some homework in reading this further. However, I think many people will agree here- supraphysiological levels are beneficial, mostly.
No doubt there's an agenda here. Clearly ignores the fact that most feel the benefits, despite these supposed negative findings
 
No doubt there's an agenda here. Clearly ignores the fact that most feel the benefits, despite these supposed negative findings
So true

At least
most 'no benefit' doctors have fleeing customers and end up working for the gov't
while TRT Drs retain them and get to own expensive private clinics
 
"Still, some of the areas where testosterone was found to have no impact were surprising. In bodybuilders, which the study excluded because they take testosterone in very high doses, testosterone is shown to enhance muscle mass and strength. So researchers were puzzled when their findings included no evidence that testosterone increased strength for men diagnosed with “low-T”, even though it increased their muscle mass."

wow
 
Back
Top