(Test E) Half-Life in the Deltoid Muscle?

Mighty_Bluff

New Member
I'm currently using Shering Test E. at 375mgs every 4th day... I was under the assumption that the Half-Life was around 4 to 5 days... but 90% of the time I'm injecting into my Deltoid Muscle, and occasionally into my Quads... but only if/when my Delts are too sore or inflamed... Anyway, I recently read that injecting into the Delt Muscle doubles the Half-Life of Test. Can any of the Vets or experts confirm this for me? If this is the case, I may need to tweak my current cycle...With a 10day Half-Life I'll have more than 1500mgs of Test in my blood soon... and I think that's way too much for me, especially since I was expecting something more along the lines of 700-800mgs... Thanks!

Bluff...
 
too sore or inflamed... Anyway, I recently read that injecting into the Delt Muscle doubles the Half-Life of Test.

Do you know who the source of this information was?
I recall a few years ago Hooker {Anthony Roberts} writing a post on this forum stating that same thing.When I questioned him on it he either didn't see my post or choose to ignore it.
I think its a crock.I can't see how injecting into the delt could change the bioavailablity of the ester in the body.
 
I agree with you, which is why I was surprised when I read it... It was on the Roid Calculator page...which oddly enough had a contribution from Bill Roberts... I'm curious if anyone else has information on this subject matter... Thanks!
 
From Roidcalc.com

The Roid Calculator calculates the estimated blood level of different steroids, using half-lifes. The half-life is simply the time when 100 active milligrams breaks down to 50 active milligrams, to 25 active milligrams, and so on. The half-life may come after a few days, or a few hours, depending on the drug. You can use it to see how much 'roids' you really have in your blood. Please remember that the results are only approximate. The half-lifes used below is based on several scientific studies.
Most of these studies used the glutes as injection site, if you inject in the delta muscle you will have much longer half-lives, try doubling all half-lives.
 
Isn't that kinda like saying "An asprin will cure a headace for one day when chewed, but if you stick it up your ass you won't have a headache for one week" :confused:

Confusion.jpg


I'M CONFUSED ON THIS ONE.....

Looks like Nurse McStabbs double the half life of Peanutbutter JR's pain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Technically test C & E are both somewhere around 8 days on half-life. This can vary plus or minus a bit depending on metabolism and other factors. BUT I SWEAR THE HALF LIFE IS ACTUALLY MORE LIKE 4 DAYS!!! Could be just me, but I can feel the test starting to simmer down significantly by day 4 post injection.. This response does not appear to be related to the amount injected either. Keep in mind that single injection dosages around 250mgs will be easier to "feel", as they move through their lifespans . Whereas larger, more excessive doses/or closer together and creating a larger weekly protocol, may not be so physically pronounced due to the fact that you are putting so much in at one time thus blowing the response of the charts. You cant really appreciate the "feel" of the metabolization of a test regimen unless you are on a low TRT type protocal and allowing your body to truely get low between injections.. There is no difference in ester life based on injection site.
 
Maybe thats what happened to him as a child. What is he, 16 yrs old now???



Isn't that kinda like saying "An asprin will cure a headace for one day when chewed, but if you stick it up your ass you won't have a headache for one week" :confused:

Confusion.jpg


I'M CONFUSED ON THIS ONE.....

Looks like Nurse McStabbs double the half life of Peanutbutter JR's pain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Technically test C & E are both somewhere around 8 days on half-life. This can vary plus or minus a bit depending on metabolism and other factors. BUT I SWEAR THE HALF LIFE IS ACTUALLY MORE LIKE 4 DAYS!!! Could be just me, but I can feel the test starting to simmer down significantly by day 4 post injection.. This response does not appear to be related to the amount injected either. Keep in mind that single injection dosages around 250mgs will be easier to "feel", as they move through their lifespans . Whereas larger, more excessive doses/or closer together and creating a larger weekly protocol, may not be so physically pronounced due to the fact that you are putting so much in at one time thus blowing the response of the charts. You cant really appreciate the "feel" of the metabolization of a test regimen unless you are on a low TRT type protocal and allowing your body to truely get low between injections.. There is no difference in ester life based on injection site.

If im correct the highest saturation point of test e&c @ 250mg is 24 or 48 days from injection.That might be the simmering point and you can feel it declining shortly after.

But I still can find the logic of half life changing from different injection sites.
Is it possible he(author of original post)is trying say that injecting in the delt causes a depo inj.to have different seepage rate into the blood stream intern causing different levels of test in the body compared to a glutei injection?? I dont know someone try to clarify that.
 
Re: AAS Half-Life

The half-life of a drug is dependent on the Volume and Muscle. In a prior post, I describe and reference the findings as related to nandrolone esters. I am sure the same can be said for testosterone esters.

See: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/134282763

so my thinking was on track?If different muscle volume dictates different conversion rates,What area of injection is the current data of half life based on?
This would mean, in theory, site inj. would cause a great deal of fluctuation.:confused:
 
I am not sure how this could be. Muscle is all fed by the same circulatory system, in and out, constantly. The depot reaction is caused by the BB in the solution. The BB should hold the testosterone in the muscle fiber for a slowed release into the system over about two days, that is if the injection was done correctly and it all hit muscle. Still the only difference this should create would be the exact time of delay to hit the blood stream. It is not until after this process of release into mainstream circulation that the half life begins to apply at the cyp, or whatever, is now dealing with the liver and beginning to break down. So even the deposit function is not related to half life. Only a slight delay before this begins. It is only an additional 1-2 days. NOT 2...... then another 1....... then another 1/2......etc....

I do believe that certain drugs will have a higher or lower likelyhood of fat solubility, and not only that, but the ability to remain in fatty tissue leaching out slowly over time. If you read one of my posts a few months back with regard to Deca, I was stating that my suspision was the the deca is suppressive for so long, and turns up positive in tests for up to a year, due to the fact that its natue makes it stay in fat for longer time. And for fat people like me, this presents all that much more of a problem to clear it. This is only a hunch.. A chemical structure that is determined to be water or oil soluble is only one clue. The weight of the structure and the number of bonds is the main factor. For example, Testosterone Decanoate is described as "allmost totally insoluble in water. This is somewhat due to the fact that the ester attached has a very long carbon ester, in which gives it the proclaimed two week half-life. But why is it that with Deca or Nandrolone Decanoate (14 day half life), and Testosterone Decanoate (14 day half life) remain detectable and active for much longer than there stats give credit for.?? Also note that both base steroids are joined with the same ester (decanoate). Hence the same metabolism rate. Everyone likes to talk about the lengthy shut down associated with Deca, BUT THE DON'T SEEM TO BRAG ABOUT EXTENDED BENEFITS????? WTF?? That is afterall what that means. Funny how they are marketing Test Decanoate as some kind of miracle long lasting steroidal solution for TRT, and all of the sudden this ester is touted as something special due to its hang time. The suggested dosing rate for T Decanoate does not seem to add up to the length of effective time they are stating it will remain active. Yet if you take Nandrolone Decanoate and do the math given 14 day half lives, there is no way that any significant amount should remain in the body beyond 6 months post last injection ON THE OUTSIDE.. After all, thats 12 halflives!!!!!. THE POINT IS that some heavy metals, for example, will almost never leave the fatty cells once absorbed. While Deca is clearly discounted and should probably bi considered "long acting" as an economical steroid due to its long half-life, and T Decanoate is at the same time praised for an incredibly long half-life and long effective working time, THEY BOTH CLEARLY APPEAR TO METABOLIZE MORE SLOWLY THAN THEIR 14 DAY HALF-LIFE WOULD SUGGEST...... What is it about the Decanoate Carbon Ester that makes this happen? Is there something about the nature of this ester that is causing it to make a second depost, so to speak, in fatty tissue, thus not only greatly extending its time in the body, but reducing the overall active amount in the bloodstream to a degree varying by the amount of body fat one possesses.....:confused:
 
AAS Half-Life

The half-life of a drug is dependent on the Volume and Muscle. In a prior post, I describe and reference the findings as related to nandrolone esters. I am sure the same can be said for testosterone esters.

See: https://thinksteroids.com/community/threads/134282763

What is the mechanism that causes levels to be dependent on injection sites? Is it mostly blood flow? Do fat concentrations in these muscles have an influence?
 
less/small muscle = smaller absorption rate, make sense to me. However, I would just ignore it for my injections.
 
Back
Top