“THE” best guaranteed bulking stack

Do you guys think 20-30mg trest E/week is "worth it" to add to a 300mg test cyp and 400mg EQ/week cycle?
good question, if you already know your response and dont have massive sides you should probably ~2x-4x that dose. obviously work your way up 2-3 weeks at a time if you dont know your reaction to those dosages yet
 
As the title says, if you had to pick a combination of compounds and dosages to have the perfect bulk, force the most muscle growth, what would it be?

I’m in a very lucky situation where my training/food/sleep are 100% consistent everyday and I can keep it that way indefinitely, atleast for the next planned 40-50weeks.

Bloods are better than I was natural, and I get no sides.

Personally, I am running 825mg test e, 420 mast e, 800mg tren ace, 50mg anadrol, 12ius HGH. This stack has caused 0 issues so far, just the night sweats which don’t rly affect my sleep, I sleep like a baby for 9-11 hours.

Cuz honestly I have never tried eq/npp/ment/deca.

Cuz Test/Tren/Mast/GH seems as complete as it gets, but maybe I’m missing smth?
There is always insulin but I don’t rly want to mess with that rn.

But I wonder if I can improve.

Anyways, as the title says, sides/blood aside, what would your stack and doses be?
How can anyone even give him credit?
This post is complete nonsense.
Tren is not an effective compound for building quality mass. Well at least not at this absurd dose.
What I keep encountering are accounts from people who lack even a basic understanding of what it truly means to build muscle.
To remain lean while growing, one should aim to gain roughly 0.5% of body weight per week—yet here I see claims of progress ten times greater than Nick Walker’s, supposedly achieved through the most absurd drug combinations imaginable.

If the gear was the solution it would be really easy.
 
How can anyone even give him credit?
This post is complete nonsense.
Tren is not an effective compound for building quality mass. Well at least not at this absurd dose.
What I keep encountering are accounts from people who lack even a basic understanding of what it truly means to build muscle.
To remain lean while growing, one should aim to gain roughly 0.5% of body weight per week—yet here I see claims of progress ten times greater than Nick Walker’s, supposedly achieved through the most absurd drug combinations imaginable.

If the gear was the solution it would be really easy.
I gain about 0.0008% on TRT working in the gym at a pace that keeps my tendons happy- averaging 0.18lbs/week FFM increase over the past year or so. On NPP with test base and some mast I can gain almost a pound a week FFM with increased volume for about 2 months before gains taper. That’s about 0.004%- just under your number which probably assumes a touch of fat to cut after coming off and consolidating. These % numbers are based on almost stage lean 8% bodyfat which I am not. I did the math based on my 213lb FFM but at 230 total. I’m currently on a cut and crossing from 15%bf to 14% under 250 total so I still have fat to burn for recomp, where a leaner person would need that .001% fat gain per week buffer to insure enough food is going in to grow but not spill.

Agreed that tren is a cosmetic compound not a mass builder- the aggression and cns could definitely help someone train harder and muscle can be built in a surplus with AR support, but the pumped up look fades in a way that it doesn’t as much on nandralone despite almost equal amounts of water coming on & off with both compounds- that quality muscle growth isn’t there with tren, at least for me.

Kinda thinking I’m not the one you were calling out, but my numbers line up with yours when I ran em. Curious where you got those numbers from- experience/reading or both?
 
Back
Top