The Lobster International, AU, CANADA and EU Domestic HGH, PEPTIDES and Turkish Pharmacy

Why only the first customer? How does that prove that your product is legit across the batch(es)? If you really want to prove your products are all good then it would be much better to cover the costs for anybody testing your product. Not just the first one.

My dear lovely friend

You are welcome to test every single vial you purchase from us. I offer a $200 store credit for every test you complete on our behalf.I’ve been offering store credit for blind testing since the very beginning of my sales here

As for IGF, I am covering the full cost of the test for the first order

I honestly don’t understand why you’re getting so aggressive

Take it easy have some chamomile tea and relax
 
My dear lovely friend

You are welcome to test every single vial you purchase from us. I offer a $200 store credit for every test you complete on our behalf.I’ve been offering store credit for blind testing since the very beginning of my sales here

As for IGF, I am covering the full cost of the test for the first order

I honestly don’t understand why you’re getting so aggressive

Take it easy have some chamomile tea and relax
Haha thanks. I'm not aggressive at all but I can see why you think that. In that case, you're 100% good to go. I'm just trying keep things "honest" on the forum. What you wrote could have been interpreted in the wrong way. With this clarification there is no doubt. Win win. Thanks friend.
 
One thing, lobster is not the cheapest at all.

Btw SSA GH has been causing ISR to a few ppl I know very well, me included.
Not every vials but that's my personal experience with their 24IU.

Except that I would say their GH is better than many others but doesn't dissolve as good and as quick as lobster.

Sides I didn't get any from both.

We are splitting hairs here anyway
In-Stent Restenosis?
 
I don't see it as a conclusion but it's an angle we shouldn't fully dismiss until we understand better if HGH is directly causing (amplified) side effects or if it's another component that we haven't considered. The fact that pharma GH is reported to have less sides as well makes me think that it's something else though.
You are free to see things as you want. Different pharmaceutical brands of the same medication can also give different side effects too, yet nobody is hanging off of the CEOs of those companies balls all day long complaining that they got misfolded proteins that show up on serum somatropin/raise IGF but do not attach to the receptor (please god help me stop laughing at this).
 
You are free to see things as you want. Different pharmaceutical brands of the same medication can also give different side effects too, yet nobody is hanging off of the CEOs of those companies balls all day long complaining that they got misfolded proteins that show up on serum somatropin/raise IGF but do not attach to the receptor (please god help me stop laughing at this).
I'm glad that I am. Then maybe if you're not interested in the topic, it's better for you to digress and focus on something else. The fact that you don't find it meaningful doesn't mean that others don't.
 
I don't see it as a conclusion but it's an angle we shouldn't fully dismiss until we understand better if HGH is directly causing (amplified) side effects or if it's another component that we haven't considered. The fact that pharma GH is reported to have less sides as well makes me think that it's something else though.
It is really an exercise in futility. Pharma vs UGL. Too many variables, too much anecdotal data. That guy gets wrapped around the axle about crap AI generates but has very little real world experience to speak on. It’s always one new shiny thing to spin everyone up over. Then he moves on to the next. He’s bored without a life.
 
It is really an exercise in futility. Pharma vs UGL. Too many variables, too much anecdotal data. That guy gets wrapped around the axle about crap AI generates but has very little real world experience to speak on. It’s always one new shiny thing to spin everyone up over. Then he moves on to the next. He’s bored without a life.
So you personally are bearish on any additional testing using orthogonal methods to shine light on these questions of UG vs Pharma? I am interested in your opinion. At the least CD should give us some insight into secondary/tertiary structures. Bioassays for HCPs and bioactivity would also be novel as applied to the UG. No?
 
So you personally are bearish on any additional testing using orthogonal methods to shine light on these questions of UG vs Pharma? I am interested in your opinion. At the least CD should give us some insight into secondary/tertiary structures. Bioassays for HCPs and bioactivity would also be novel as applied to the UG. No?
I’m all in on that testing. I think it would be very illuminating. And I appreciate anything you can do to make it happen. I just wonder whether it will truly put to bed the age old question of which is the better choice.

And just so you know, I wasn’t referring to you in that comment.
 
So you personally are bearish on any additional testing using orthogonal methods to shine light on these questions of UG vs Pharma? I am interested in your opinion. At the least CD should give us some insight into secondary/tertiary structures. Bioassays for HCPs and bioactivity would also be novel as applied to the UG. No?
My thought is that the structure is probably normal. It’s not that difficult to fold gh actually. It basically folds itself when placed in the correct conditions.

The more interesting question is the degree of purification and the proportion of correctly folded gh that is present in each product.
 
I’m all in on that testing. I think it would be very illuminating. And I appreciate anything you can do to make it happen. I just wonder whether it will truly put to bed the age old question of which is the better choice.

And just so you know, I wasn’t referring to you in that comment.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I appreciate it.

I am hopeful we can all come together to do some impactful testing together, perhaps get some useful data, and further strengthen the community bond. I think the latter is a worthy goal and I will do better to support it.
 
I'm glad that I am. Then maybe if you're not interested in the topic, it's better for you to digress and focus on something else. The fact that you don't find it meaningful doesn't mean that others don't.
Same goes for you. You replied to me first, instead of letting me have my say, you negated it, yet when I negated your reply, you tell me I shouldn't reply? Maybe you have had too much misfolded protein injected into you.
 
Same goes for you. You replied to me first, instead of letting me have my say, you negated it, yet when I negated your reply, you tell me I shouldn't reply? Maybe you have had too much misfolded protein injected into you.
What do you mean instead of letting you have your say? You had your say. Yes, same medications can have different side effects based on brand. But that doesn't mean that this is the case here. You're just derailing the conversation by giving blanket statements. Yet you're full of yourself. Laughing at people instead of contributing to a conversation.
 
I am afraid at this point we could have the best and most expensive testing in the world and there would still be disputes. Not saying it is a waste of time or it shouldn't be done. It very much should be as it is the best we can do to keep the community safe and suppliers from scamming. However, I doubt it will cut down on the back and forth very much.

It's much like politics. People will defend their favorite suppliers and spit on others regardless of what evidence is presented to them. We all have biases. I try to be as objective and take emotion and bias out as much as I can, but that can only go so far.

At the end of the day, I know no matter how much sugar I sprinkle on it, due to not being a mutli millionaire, I am stuck with injecting unregulated products from China and are hoping to make the best choice with the info I have.
 
I am afraid at this point we could have the best and most expensive testing in the world and there would still be disputes. Not saying it is a waste of time or it shouldn't be done. It very much should be as it is the best we can do to keep the community safe and suppliers from scamming. However, I doubt it will cut down on the back and forth very much.

It's much like politics. People will defend their favorite suppliers and spit on others regardless of what evidence is presented to them. We all have biases. I try to be as objective and take emotion and bias out as much as I can, but that can only go so far.

At the end of the day, I know no matter how much sugar I sprinkle on it, due to not being a mutli millionaire, I am stuck with injecting unregulated products from China and are hoping to make the best choice with the info I have.
Need some rationale arguments onto supplies. Just can't go full apeshit cause they are a source.

We need to be justified and think about our concerns of safety. If that goes out the window then it's the mob mentality.

But you are right. I agree with you. What is a practical goal to ensure safety?'
 
What do you mean instead of letting you have your say? You had your say. Yes, same medications can have different side effects based on brand. But that doesn't mean that this is the case here. You're just derailing the conversation by giving blanket statements. Yet you're full of yourself. Laughing at people instead of contributing to a conversation.
You can't handle having your say and letting others have theirs, and will go on and try to convince others how to interpret what I said and meant.
 
New Promotion

Buy 6 Get 2 Free available for select products in limited quantities!

HGH 110IU
Tirzepatide 10 mg
Retatrutide 10 mg
Semaglutide 5 mg / 10 mg
TB500 10 mg
TB4 10 mg


Thank you for your continued support

Code:
 https://janoshik.com/tests/69094-THE_LOBSTER_HGH_P37LV8GL5BH5

is this thru int chyna or lobster int? If int lobster the 110’s so out of stock?
 
Back
Top